中国科技论文统计源期刊 中文核心期刊  
美国《化学文摘》《国际药学文摘》
《乌利希期刊指南》
WHO《西太平洋地区医学索引》来源期刊  
日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)
第七届湖北十大名刊提名奖  
医药导报, 2017, 36(6): 622-625
doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1004-0781.2017.06.008
特立帕肽治疗老年性骨质疏松症的疗效及生活质量改善
Efficacy and Improvement on Quality of Life in Senile Osteoporosis Treated with Teriparatide
姜红峰, 彭绍蓉, 黄蔡华

摘要:

目的 研究特立帕肽治疗老年性骨质疏松症患者的骨密度(BMD)和骨标志物的变化,评估生活质量的改善。方法 选取老年性骨质疏松症患者45例,给予特立帕肽20 μg,每个月注射28 d,疗程12个月。在治疗前和治疗3,6和12个月分别检测BMD,抽血查生化指标和骨标志物;疼痛数字评分法(NRS)进行疼痛评分;采用简明健康状况调查表(SF-36量表)进行生活质量的评定。结果 治疗前患者NRS评分为(4.96±2.25)分,治疗3,6及12个月后,患者NRS评分分别为(2.84±1.41),(1.56±1.16),(1.36±1.00)分(P<0.01)。患者治疗后总SF-36评分也较治疗前明显增高(P<0.05)。治疗3,6及12个月,腰椎BMD分别提高约7.7%,12.3%及15.4%;股骨颈BMD提高约3.0%,6.1%及7.6%;股骨粗隆BMD分别提高5.7%,8.6%及10.0%。治疗3,6和12个月后患者血清骨钙素、骨碱性磷酸酶、Ⅰ型前胶原N-端前肽较治疗前均明显增高(P<0.01),而β型胶原交联C端肽在治疗后12个月有明显降低(P<0.05)。治疗期间副作用少。结论 特立帕肽治疗老年性骨质疏松1年后可明显减轻骨痛,增加腰椎和股骨粗隆BMD,改善患者生活质量。

关键词: 特立帕肽 ; 骨质疏松症 ; 骨密度 ; 骨标志物 ; 生活质量

Abstract:

Objective To explore the changes of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone markers in senile osteoporosis patients treated with teriparatide,and evaluate the improvement on quality of life (QOL) as well as the clinical significance. Methods Forty-five senile osteoporosis inpatients were treated with 20 μg of teriparatide for one year. BMD and bone markers were detected before treatment and also in the third,sixth and twelfth month during treatment.The level of numerical rating scale (NRS) and QOL were assessed. Results The NRS before treatment was (4.96±2.25) , and those after treatment of 3, 6 and 12 months were(2.84±1.41), (1.56±1.16) and (1.36±1.00), respectively (P<0.01). The total scores of SF-36 significantly increased after treatment (P<0.01). After treatment of 3, 6 and 12 months, BMD of lumbar vertebra had increased 7.7%, 12.3% and 15.4%, respectively; that of femoral neck had increased 3.0%, 6.1% and 7.6%, respectively; and that of intertrochanteric bone had increased 5.7%, 8.6% and 10.0%, respectively. Meanwhile, the serum levels of osteocalcin, bone alkaline phosphatase and N terminal propeptide of type I procollagen were significantly higher than those before treatment (P<0.01), nevertheless beta collagen cross-linked C-terminal peptide (β-CTX) only significantly decreased at the 12th month after treatment (P<0.05). Conclusion Chronic teriparatide therapy could significantly relieve bone pain,improve the quality of life and increase lumbar vertebra BMD in senile osteoporosis.

Key words: Teriparatide ; Osteoporosis ; Bone mineral density ; Bone markers ; Quality of life

骨质疏松症是一种退化性疾病,已成为人类的重要健康问题, 患病风险随着年龄增长而增加。骨质疏松症是导致老年人脆性骨折的一个关键危险因素。骨质疏松症的患者存在骨痛、疲软、骨折以及生活质量下降等临床表现。骨质疏松的治疗方法可通过调节骨吸收和骨形成以达到减少或逆转骨重建的负平衡。甲状旁腺激素的生理学作用包括直接作用于成骨细胞刺激骨骼形成,间接增加肠道钙的吸收,增加肾小管钙的重吸收和增强磷酸盐在肾脏的排泄。特立帕肽是重组人内源性甲状旁腺激素的活性片段(1-34),是第一个用于临床的有促进骨形成的治疗骨质疏松症的药物,可更早增加骨形成,其幅度大于骨吸收,对骨重建平衡有积极的作用,它可以增加骨密度,改善骨微结构和强度,并减少骨折的发生[1-3]。目前国内外对特立帕肽治疗骨质疏松症,主要用于有骨折高发风险的绝经后妇女骨质疏松症的治疗,主要研究集中于对骨密度(bone mineral density,BMD)的增加和骨折的减少[4]。老年性骨质疏松症是原发性骨质疏松的Ⅱ型,目前特立帕肽治疗老年性骨质疏松症的文献不多,研究的时间也较短,不能反映出特立帕肽治疗老年性骨质疏松症的真实疗效和作用[5]。本研究系统评估特立帕肽对老年性骨质疏松症患者BMD和骨标志物的影响以及生活质量的改变以及临床意义。

1 资料与方法
1.1 临床资料

选取2013年3月—2015年4月在我院老年病科住院的45例老年性骨质疏松症患者,其中男20例,女25例,平均(76.8±3.2)岁,平均体重指数(24.2±3.2)kg·(m2)-1。纳入标准:①≥70岁;②以双能X线(DEXA)测定的值作为骨质疏松的诊断标准:BMD的T-Score<-2.5SD;③存在骨痛;④自愿参与研究,并签署知情同意书。纳入的患者均同时满足以上4个条件。排除标准:①存在影响骨代谢异常疾病和内分泌疾病(肾上腺、甲状旁腺、性腺及甲状腺疾病等);②自身免疫性疾病患者;③影响钙和维生素D吸收和调节的消化道疾病,长期服用糖皮质激素或其他影响骨代谢的药物;④有严重心脏、肝、肾功能疾病者;⑤在研究前6个月内使用过抗骨质疏松药物。患者基线资料见表1。男性患者和女性患者在年龄、体重指数、腰背疼痛及腰椎、股骨颈、股骨粗隆BMD比较均差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。

1.2 给药方法

治疗前,所有研究对象均检测BMD、抽血查生化和骨标志物,均口服钙剂500 mg和维生素D3胶丸20 μg·d-1作为基础治疗,同时每天皮下注射特立帕肽(商品名:复泰奥,美国礼来公司生产,进口药品注册文号:S20110021)20 μg,每个月注射28 d,如果有遗漏,每个月遗漏不超过8次,疗程12个月,每天在大致相同的时间用药,注射部位在下腹部或者大腿外侧。治疗后3,6,12个月再次检测BMD、血生化指标以及骨标志物。治疗期间均正常饮食、运动,不服用其他影响骨代谢的药物。

1.3 检测指标

采用双能X线骨密度仪检测受试者第2~4腰椎椎体、右侧股骨颈和大粗隆BMD。采用T值作为划分BMD的诊断标准,T值≤-2.5 SD为骨质疏松。所有患者分别于治疗前及治疗后3,6和12个月取空腹静脉血,分离血清标本后采用酶联免疫吸附试验检测骨标志物。血生化使用全自动生化分析仪,采用酶法测定。监测不良反应:记录每次访视的症状、生命体征、检验科检查结果。

疼痛评价通过疼痛数字视觉评分法(numerical rating scale,NRS),从0到10数字,分别表示无痛到最剧烈疼痛,0表示无痛,1~4为轻度疼痛,5~6为中度疼痛,7~10为重度疼痛。

采用简明健康状况调查表SF-36量表(MOS 36-item short-form health survey,SF-36)进行生活质量评定,于治疗前和治疗后3,6和12个月后分别评分。使用SF-36生命质量量表,从生理功能(physical functioning,PF)、生理职能(role physical,RP)、躯体疼痛(body pain,BP)、一般健康状况(general health,GH)、活力(vitality,VT)、社会功能(social functioning,SF)、情感职能(role emotional,RE)、心理健康(mental heath,MH)等8个方面评价骨质疏松症患者的生活质量。

1.4 统计学方法

采用SPSS11.5版统计软件进行统计学分析,计量资料以均数±标准差( x ̅ ±s)表示,治疗前后均数比较采用自身配对t检验,以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

2 结果
2.1 特立帕肽对骨痛的效果

治疗前患者NRS评分为(4.96±2.25),治疗3,6及12个月后,患者NRS评分分别为(2.84±1.41),(1.56±1.16),(1.36±1.00),均较患者治疗前NRS评分明显下降(t=5.36,9.01,9.81,P<0.01)。

2.2 不同部位BMD变化

记录腰椎、股骨颈以及股骨粗隆BMD,腰椎骨密度按第2~4腰椎椎体平均BMD计算。经特立帕肽治疗3,6及12个月,腰椎BMD分别提高约7.7%,12.3%及15.4%;股骨颈BMD提高约3.0%,6.1%及7.6%;股骨粗隆BMD提高分别为5.7%,8.6%及10.0%。与治疗前比较,治疗12个月后腰椎骨BMD和股骨粗隆BMD较治疗前增高(P<0.05),而股骨颈改善不明显(P>0.05),见表2。

表1 患者基本情况
Tab.1 Basic information of the patients
性别 例数 年龄/岁 体重指数/
[kg·(m2)-1]
腰背痛 其他部位疼痛 BMD/[g·(cm2)-1]
腰椎 股骨颈 股骨粗隆
20 77.0±3.0 24.5±3.3 16 13 0.69±0.07 0.67±0.08 0.71±0.08
25 76.6±3.4 24.2±3.1 23 17 0.68±0.09 0.65±0.11 0.69±0.09
合计 45 76.8±3.2 24.2±3.2 39 30 0.68±0.08 0.66±0.10 0.70±0.08

表1 患者基本情况

Tab.1 Basic information of the patients

表2 患者治疗前后BMD变化
Tab.2 Changes of the patients’ BMD before and after treatment g·(cm2)-1,x¯±s,n=45
时间 腰椎 股骨颈 股骨粗隆
治疗前 0.65±0.18 0.66±0.10 0.70±0.09
治疗3个月 0.70±0.11 0.68±0.09 0.74±0.09
治疗6个月 0.73±0.13*1 0.70±0.11 0.76±0.14
治疗12个月 0.75±0.14*1 0.71±0.10 0.77±0.13*1

与治疗前比较,*1P<0.05

Comparison with the level before treatment,*1P<0.05

表2 患者治疗前后BMD变化

Tab.2 Changes of the patients’ BMD before and after treatment g·(cm2)-1,x¯±s,n=45

2.3 骨质疏松症患者特立帕肽治疗前后的生活质量的变化

治疗3个月后,患者SF-36总评分明显增高(P<0.05),在GH、BP、PF以及RP领域也有增高(P<0.05);治疗6个月后患者SF-36评分总分继续升高(P<0.01),在GH、PF、RP领域也继续明显增高(P<0.01),BP领域较治疗前升高(P<0.05);治疗12个月后,患者SF-36评分总分进一步升高(P<0.01),并且在GH、PF、RP等领域都有明显提高(P<0.01),BP、SF以及RE领域增高(P<0.05),见表3。

表3 特立帕肽治疗老年性骨质疏松症治疗前后SF-36得分变化
Tab.3 Changes of the patients’ SF-36 scores before and after teriparatide therapy for senile osteoporosis 分,x¯±s,n=45
时间 SF-36总分 GH BP PF SF VT RE RP MH
治疗前 76.65±12.06 10.66±3.56 4.66±1.77 16.56±3.58 4.62±1.65 12.05±4.25 4.65±1.25 4.23±0.62 19.23±3.65
治疗3个月 83.34±13.35*1 12.34±3.58*1 5.60±1.81*1 19.06±3.68*1 5.10±1.70 12.35±4.65 5.17±1.33 4.68±0.82*1 19.56±3.74
治疗6个月 92.44±15.25*2 15.34±3.50*2 5.90±1.83*1 22.06±3.72*2 5.40±1.80 13.35±5.35 5.37±1.43 5.45±0.65*2 19.56±3.85
治疗12个月 96.79±15.35*2 15.56±3.56*2 6.00±1.90*1 23.20±3.85*2 5.52±1.75*1 13.76±5.66*1 5.31±1.45*1 5.72±0.68*2 19.80±4.32

Comparison with the level before treatment, *1P<0.05,*2P<0.01

与治疗前比较,*1P<0.05,*2P<0.01

表3 特立帕肽治疗老年性骨质疏松症治疗前后SF-36得分变化

Tab.3 Changes of the patients’ SF-36 scores before and after teriparatide therapy for senile osteoporosis 分,x¯±s,n=45

2.4 血清骨代谢标志物的变化

治疗3,6及12个月后,患者血清骨钙素(osteocalcin,OC)、骨碱性磷酸酶(bone alkaline phosphatase,BAP)和Ⅰ型前胶原N-端前肽(N terminal propeptide of type I procollagen,PINP)较治疗前呈持续升高趋势(P<0.01)。而β型胶原交联C端肽(beta collagen cross-linked C-terminal peptide,β-CTX)降低(P<0.05)。见表4。

表4 患者治疗前后骨标志物变化
Tab.4 Changes of the patients’ bone markers before and after treatment x¯±s,n=45
时间 OC β-CTX BAP PINP 钙含量/
(mmol·L-1)
(ng·mL-1)
治疗前 20.3±3.5 0.795±0.453 9.36±4.32 47.6±20.5 2.16±0.12
治疗3个月 25.4±2.5*2 0.654±0.510 14.57±7.43*2 105.4±30.5*2 2.24±0.41
治疗6个月 29.4±3.5*2 0.553±0.403 16.52±8.94*2 125.4±33.5*2 2.20±0.32
治疗12个月 30.4±4.5*2 0.536±0.324*1 16.81±8.36*2 130.4±24.5*2 2.12±0.26

Comparison with the level before treatment,*1P<0.01,*2P<0.05

与治疗前比较,*1P<0.01,*2P<0.05

表4 患者治疗前后骨标志物变化

Tab.4 Changes of the patients’ bone markers before and after treatment x¯±s,n=45

2.5 用药安全性

2例患者出现头晕、恶心。未监测到关节疼痛、高血钙、肝肾功能损伤或其他严重不良事件。

3 讨论

本研究采用自身对照,观察特立帕肽治疗老年性骨质疏松症1年间,患者临床症状和体征改善情况,以及对BMP和骨标志物的影响。以前对特立帕肽治疗骨质疏松症的关注重点在于减少骨折的发生,然而骨质疏松症不仅可引起骨折,更多引起患者骨痛和身体疲软无力,生活质量明显下降。

本研究结果提示特立帕肽治疗老年骨质疏松症3个月后,骨痛症状可以减轻,12个月后骨痛症状改善最明显,甚至在停药后骨痛减轻的症状能明显延续。这说明了特立帕肽不仅可以改善患者近期骨痛,而且对于远期骨痛,甚至停药后缓解骨痛的疗效可以延续较长时间。

有研究已经证实骨质疏松症患者生活质量低于一般人群,尤其在与生理功能关系较大的领域,且SF-36能够将骨质疏松患者与一般人区分开来,也说明SF-36具有较好的区分效度[6]。国外研究也证实BMD及骨折发生数与生活质量间有显著相关。因此骨质疏松症生活质量的下降是独立于患者骨质疏松症BMD下降严重程度和骨折外的影响,以前特立帕肽治疗骨质疏松症没有涉及此方面。本研究提示特立帕肽治疗后可以明显提高3,6及12个月SF-36总评分。通过对生活质量各领域的分析可以发现,特立帕肽可以提高患者功能,改善患者活动能力,提高情感职能影响。这说明特立帕肽可以通过改善老年骨质疏松症患者生理功能,减轻躯体疼痛状况,减轻患者负性心理压力,促使患者积极生活。

本研究结果发现老年性骨质疏松症患者每日皮下注射特立帕肽20 μg, 在治疗6和12个月后,较治疗前腰椎BMD明显增高;对于股骨粗隆BMD在治疗12个月后也有同样效果,这说明特立帕肽能大幅度增加小梁骨骨量,提高骨形成的速率,6个月内持续上升并维持到12个月。本研究还提示特立帕肽对于股骨颈BMD有所增加,但较治疗前差异无统计学意义。这和已有的结论一致。股骨颈BMD主要反映皮质骨的密度变化情况。特立帕肽增加骨转换,扩大骨重塑空间,用新骨替代已经矿化的陈旧骨,增加皮质骨骨内膜的孔隙率,因此增加皮质BMD不明显。

临床上常通过联合检测骨形成和骨吸收标志物来预测骨丢失率,评价骨质疏松症的治疗效果。血清OC、BAP及PINP是由成骨细胞生成和分泌的,是反映成骨细胞功能、骨转换率和骨形成的特异指标[7-8], PINP是目前提示骨形成最灵敏的指标。β-CTX是骨组织中胶原的代谢产物,可反映骨吸收状况[9]。本研究还发现在治疗3个月后,特立帕肽就可明显提高血清OC、BAP及PINP的水平,这种效应一直持续到治疗12个月;在治疗12个月后特立帕肽能减少β-CTX的水平。胡江伟等[5]仅观察到OC、BAP骨形成指标增高,对骨吸收指标CTX没有明显降低,这可能与观察时间较短有关。在本研究中观察到骨吸收指标在治疗12个月后也有明显降低。这说明特立帕肽对原发性骨质疏松症患者有刺激成骨细胞活性和抑制破骨细胞功能。因此,特立帕肽对骨代谢具有双重作用,小剂量间歇性给药,既能促进骨形成,又能抑制骨吸收,最终通过内生骨量的增加促进骨密度增高[10]。因此,特立帕肽治疗老年性骨质疏松症较二膦酸盐和降钙素在增加骨密度方面有优势。

综上所述,特立帕肽治疗老年性骨质疏松症1年后,能显著减轻骨痛症状,提高患者生活质量,增加骨密度,改善骨质量,副作用少,因此,特立帕肽是一种理想和安全的治疗老年骨质疏松症的药物。

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

参考文献

[1] MCCLUNG M R, SAN MARTIN J, MILLER P D,et al.Opposite bone remodeling effects of teriparatide and alendronate in increasing bone mass[J]. Arch Intern Med, 2005, 165(15):1762-1768.
Abstract BACKGROUND: Antiresorptive agents for the treatment of osteoporosis suppress bone remodeling and reestablish bone turnover at a lower rate to reduce bone loss. Recombinant teriparatide (human parathyroid hormone 1-34) stimulates bone formation, increases bone mass, and improves bone microarchitecture. We contrasted the effects of once-daily doses of 20 mug of teriparatide and 10 mg of alendronate sodium on bone mineral density (BMD) and markers of bone turnover. METHODS: Markers of bone turnover and areal BMD were assessed in 203 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in an 18-month randomized parallel double-blind study; volumetric BMD was measured in a subset of women. RESULTS: Teriparatide significantly increased markers of bone turnover that peaked at 6 months (serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide, 218%, and urinary N-telopeptide corrected for creatinine, 58%; P<.001); alendronate significantly decreased the markers at 6 months (-67% and -72%, respectively; P<.001). At 18 months, areal and volumetric spine BMDs were significantly higher with teriparatide than with alendronate (10.3% vs 5.5% [P<.001] and 19.0% vs 3.8% [P<.01], respectively). Areal femoral neck BMD was significantly higher than baseline in the teriparatide and alendronate groups (3.9% and 3.5%, respectively). There were no significant differences in trabecular femoral neck BMD between the teriparatide and alendronate groups (4.9% and 2.2%, respectively). Cortical volumetric femoral neck BMD was significantly different between the teriparatide and alendronate groups (-1.2% and 7.7%, respectively; P = .05). CONCLUSION: Two distinct options for the management of osteoporosis lead to increases in BMD by opposite mechanisms of action on bone remodeling.
DOI:10.1001/archinte.165.15.1762      PMID:16087825      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[2] BISLEV L S, SIKJAER T, REJNMARK L.Effects on calcium homeostasis of changing PTH replacement therapy of postoperative hypoparathyroidism from intact PTH to teriparatide: a case series[J]. Calcif Tissue Int, 2014,95(4):374-381.
The objective of this study was to assess the effect on calcium homeostasis of changing PTH replacement therapy (PTH-RT) from intact PTH (PTH 1–84 ) to teriparatide (PTH 1–34 ). This study is a consecutive case series. All patients with postoperative hypoparathyroidism who changed medication from PTH 1–84 (1000208g) to PTH 1–34 (200208g) were included. Plasma ionized calcium, daily dose of 1α-hydroxylated-vitamin D metabolites alfacalcidol, calcium, TSH and PTH was collected. Eight patients (women02=028802%) with a mean age of 5402±021202years and a duration of hypoPT of 1302±02602years were included. Before initiation of PTH 1–84 , the mean daily dose of alfacalcidol was 1.902±021.10208g/d and calcium supplements were 1,55002±0270502mg. Alfacalcidol dose was reduced with 8802±022902% ( p 02<020.01) after 6 months of PTH 1–84 treatment and terminated in six patients. Calcium levels were reduced with 7802±023602% ( p 02=020.02) to 27302±0235302mg/d and stopped in five patients. Six patients received 1000208g PTH 1–84 daily, the seventh 2 out of 3 days and the last every second day. When changing from PTH 1–84 to PTH 1–34 , plasma ionized calcium initially dropped and the demand for supplements increased. Alfacalcidol was resumed in five patients; mean daily dose increased to 1.5002±021.560208g/d, ( p 02=020.02) and calcium increased to 32902±0236802mg/d, ( p 02=020.72). Five patients received 200208g PTH 1–34 a day, two patients twice-a-day and one 20/400208g/d alternately. Compared with PTH 1–34 , PTH 1–84 has a longer plasma half-life and a higher calcemic response. We have shown a need for higher doses of alfacalcidol and calcium supplements to maintain normal serum calcium when treated with PTH 1–34 compared to PTH 1–84 and in some a need for more than one daily PTH 1–34 dose.
DOI:10.1007/s00223-014-9898-8      PMID:25086672      URL    
[本文引用:0]
[3] ERIKSEN E F, KEAVENY T M, GALLAGHER E R, et al.Literature review: the effects of teriparatide therapy at the hip in patients with osteoporosis[J]. Bone,2014,67:246-256.
Teriparatide is a skeletal anabolic treatment for patients with at high risk for fracture. Because adequate clinical trials have not yet been conducted to assess the efficacy of teriparatide for reducing the risk of hip fracture, we review here the literature regarding how treatment with teriparatide affects the hip in patients with . Teriparatide increases cancellous bone volume, improves bone architecture, and - uniquely among treatments - increases cortical thickness and cortical porosity. By bone scan and emission tomography, teriparatide increases throughout the skeleton, including the hip. Consistent with these findings, studies using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography for longitudinal assessment of changes at the hip have consistently shown increases in areal and volumetric bone mineral density, cortical thickness, and finite element-estimated hip strength in patients treated with teriparatide. Finally, in clinical fracture-outcome trials, treatment with teriparatide has been shown to reduce the risk of nonvertebral fracture, a composite endpoint that includes hip fracture. Taken together, this body of evidence suggests that teriparatide positively affects the hip in patients with .
DOI:10.1016/j.bone.2014.07.014      PMID:25053463      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[4] LJUNGGREN O, BARRETT A, STOYKOV I, et al.Effective osteoporosis treatment with teriparatide is associated with enhanced quality of life in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: the European Forsteo Observational Study[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2013,14:251.
Background To describe changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with teriparatide for up to 18 months and followed-up for a further 18 months, and to assess the influence of recent prior and incident fractures. Methods The European Forsteo Observational Study (EFOS) is an observational, prospective, multinational study measuring HRQoL using the EQ-5D. The primary objective was to assess changes in HRQoL during 36 months in the whole study population. A secondary post-hoc analysis examined fracture impact on HRQoL in four subgroups classified based on recent prior fracture 12 months before baseline and incident clinical fractures during the study. Changes from baseline were analysed using a repeated measures model. Results Of the 1581 patients, 48.4% had a recent prior fracture and 15.6% of these patients had an incident fracture during follow-up. 10.9% of the 816 patients with no recent prior fracture had an incident fracture. Baseline mean EQ-VAS scores were similar across the subgroups. In the total study cohort (n???=???1581), HRQoL (EQ-VAS and EQ-5D index scores) improved significantly from baseline to 18 months and this improvement was maintained over the 18-month post-teriparatide period. Improvements were seen across all five EQ-5D domains during teriparatide treatment that were maintained after teriparatide was discontinued. Subjects with incident clinical fractures had significantly less improvement in EQ-VAS than those without incident fractures. Recent prior fracture did not influence the change in EQ-VAS during treatment. Conclusions EFOS is the first longitudinal study in women with severe postmenopausal osteoporosis in the real world setting to show a substantial improvement in HRQoL during teriparatide treatment that was sustained during subsequent treatment with other medications. The increase in HRQoL was lower in the subgroups with incident fracture but was not influenced by recent prior fracture. The results should be interpreted in the context of the design of an observational study.
DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-14-251      PMID:23968239      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[5] 胡江伟,王亮,马远征,.特立帕肽治疗原发性骨质疏松症的短期疗效观察[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2013,19(12):1246-1249.
目的观察特立帕肽(Teriparatide)治疗原发性骨质疏松症的短期疗效和安全性。方法采用自身前后对照临床研究,纳入2011年12月-2012年12月在解放军第309医院骨内科住院的原发性骨质疏松症患者共10名,所有患者在每天口服补充元素钙600 mg和活性维生素D 0.25μg的同时,分别接受特立帕肽治疗,疗程6个月,具体用法为每日皮下注射特立帕肽20μg。所有患者均于用药前、用药后3、6个月采用双能X线吸收法(DEXA)测定腰椎(L2-4)、股骨颈、Ward’s区和大粗隆骨密度(BMD),用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)测定血清骨钙素(sOC)、骨碱性磷酸酶(sBAP)和Ⅰ型胶原交联C端肽(sCTX)水平。观察患者治疗前后骨密度和骨标志物的变化并进行对比分析,记录患者的不良事件。结果 10名患者均完成全疗程治疗。治疗3个月时,腰椎(L2-4)、股骨颈、Ward’s区和大粗隆骨密度改善不明显(P〉0.05),血清骨钙素(sOC)和骨碱性磷酸酶(sBAP)较治疗前明显升高(P〈0.05)。治疗6个月时,腰椎(L2-4)骨密度较治疗前明显增高(P〈0.05),而股骨颈、Ward’s区和大粗隆骨密度改善不明显(P〉0.05)。血清骨钙素(sOC)和骨碱性磷酸酶(sBAP)呈持续升高趋势(P〈0.05),Ⅰ型胶原交联C端肽(sCTX)较治疗前略升高,但差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。治疗期间不良事件的发生情况:头晕发生2例,恶心发生1例,上述情况均较轻微,没有给予特殊处理即自行缓解。结论特立帕肽能在3个月内改善患者的骨代谢状况(促进骨形成),6个月内有效增加原发性骨质疏松症患者的腰椎骨密度,适用于绝经后及老年性骨质疏松症患者的治疗。
[本文引用:2]
[6] 魏常友,冯曦兮.SF-36量表在骨质疏松症患者生命质量评价中的应用研究[J].四川医学,2007,28(12):1354-1355.
36条目简明量表(SF-36)是普适性生命质量量表,主要用于一般人群调查、不同状况下的健康比较、卫生政策制定、临床试验、卫生服务研究和监测个体患者。本研究运用SF-36量表,从躯体活动功能及其对角色功能的影响、疼痛、健康总体自评、活动、社会功能、情绪对角色功能的影响、心理功能等8个领域对骨质疏松症患者的生命质量进行评价。结果显示骨质疏松症患者的生命质量低于一般人群。
[本文引用:1]
[7] KYVERNITAKIS I, SAEGER U, ZILLER V, et al.The effect of age, sex hormones and bone turnover markers on calcaneal quantitative ultrasonometry in healthy German men[J]. J Clin Densitom, 2013,16(3):320-328.
The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine the age-dependent variations of calcaneal quantitative ultrasonometry (QUS) and the association with sex hormones and biochemical bone turnover markers in a large sample of unselected healthy German men. Bone measurements are expected to behave differently among men and women. The speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), and stiffness index (SI) of the os calcaneus were measured in 506 German men aged 20-79 yr (mean age: 45.7 yr). Additionally, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), , , , dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA-S), sex globulin () as well as N-terminal propeptide of procollagen type I (PINP), C-terminal telopeptide of type I (ICTP), , bone-specific , and CrossLaps were measured with standardized essays and correlated with the QUS results. The QUS results comprised an overall change of 12.4%, 3.2%, and 23.2% for BUA, SOS, and SI, respectively, between the 20-29 and 70-79 yr age groups (p 鈮 0.001). The annual rate of the age-related differences was 0.33% (standard deviation [SD]: 0.31), 0.06% (SD: 0.08), and 0.53% (SD: 0.56) for BUA, SOS, and SI, respectively. and DHEA-S were significantly associated with QUS parameters and increasing age, whereas showed an age-related increase and was inversely related with QUS values (p < 0.05). Bone turnover markers present lower values gradually, and we found a significant correlation between carboxy-terminal crosslinks (), (OC), bone (), and QUS variables (p < 0.05).
DOI:10.1016/j.jocd.2013.01.009      PMID:23582469      Magsci     URL    
[本文引用:1]
[8] HERRMANN W, OBEID R, SCHORR H, et al.Enhanced bone metabolism in vegetarians-the role of vitamin B12 deficiency[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med,2009, 47(11):1381-1387.
Background: Vitamin B12 deficiency and bone fractures are common in vegetarians. However, a direct relationship between vitamin B12 status and bone metabolism in vegetarians has not been tested sufficiently. Methods: Our study included 96 vegetarians (23 German vegans, and 54 German and 19 Indian lacto-, lacto-ovo-vegetarians) and 89 omnivores (Germans and Asian-Indian immigrants in Oman). Bloo...
DOI:10.1515/CCLM.2009.302      PMID:19817650      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[9] SZULC P, GARNERO P, MUNOZ F, et al.Cross-sectional evaluation of bone metabolism in men[J]. J Bone Miner Res,2001,16(9):1642-1650.
There are relatively few data concerning age-related changes of bone turnover in men. The aim of the study was to evaluate age-related changes of the levels of serum and urinary biochemical markers of bone metabolism in a large cohort of 934 men aged 19-85 years and to investigate their association with bone mineral density (BMD). Bone formation was evaluated using serum levels of osteocalcin (OC), bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), and N-terminal extension propeptide of type I collagen (PINP). Bone resorption was evaluated by measurement of urinary excretion of beta-isomerized C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I beta-CTX) of free deoxypyridinoline (fDpyr) and total Dpyr (tDPyr) and of the serum level of beta-CTX. Levels of biochemical bone markers were very high in young men and decreased rapidly until the age of 40 years and then more slowly until 60 years of age. After the age of 60 years, markers of bone formation remained stable while resorption markers showed a moderate and variable increase with aging. Serum and urinary beta-CTX levels were elevated only in about 5% of elderly men. The age-related increase of urinary excretion of tDpyr and of its free and peptide-bound fractions was related to the presence of elevated levels in a subgroup of about 15% of elderly men. Before 60 years of age, levels of biochemical bone markers were not correlated with BMD, whereas after 60 years of age, they were correlated negatively with BMD. After adjustment for age and body weight, BMD in men with the highest levels of biochemical bone markers (i.e., in the upper quartile) was 1.8-12.5% (i.e., 0.25-0.89 SD) lower than in men with levels of biochemical bone markers in the lowest quartile. In conclusion, bone turnover in men is high in young adults and decreases to reach a nadir at 55-60 years of age. After the age of 60 years, bone resorption markers--but not bone formation markers--increase in some men and are associated with lower BMD, suggesting that this imbalance is
DOI:10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.9.1642      PMID:11547833      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[10] CRANDALL CJ, NEWBERRY S J, DIAMANT A, et al.Comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic treatments to prevent fractures: an updated systematic review[J]. Ann Intern Med,2014,161(10):711-723.
Osteoporosis is a major contributor to the propensity to fracture among older adults, and various pharmaceuticals are available to treat it.To update a review about the benefits and harms of pharmacologic treatments used to prevent fractures in adults at risk.Multiple computerized databases were searched between 2 January 2005 and 4 March 2014 for English-language studies.Trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews.Duplicate extraction and assessment of data about study characteristics, outcomes, and quality.From more than 52000 titles screened, 315 articles were included in this update. There is high-strength evidence that bisphosphonates, denosumab, and teriparatide reduce fractures compared with placebo, with relative risk reductions from 0.40 to 0.60 for vertebral fractures and 0.60 to 0.80 for nonvertebral fractures. Raloxifene has been shown in placebo-controlled trials to reduce only vertebral fractures. Since 2007, there is a newly recognized adverse event of bisphosphonate use: atypical subtrochanteric femur fracture. Gastrointestinal side effects, hot flashes, thromboembolic events, and infections vary among drugs.Few studies have directly compared drugs used to treat osteoporosis. Data in men are very sparse. Costs were not assessed.Good-quality evidence supports that several medications for bone density in osteoporotic range and/or preexisting hip or vertebral fracture reduce fracture risk. Side effects vary among drugs, and the comparative effectiveness of the drugs is unclear.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and RAND Corporation.
DOI:10.7326/M14-0317      PMID:25199883      Magsci     URL    
[本文引用:1]
资源
PDF下载数    
RichHTML 浏览数    
摘要点击数    

分享
导出

相关文章:
关键词(key words)
特立帕肽
骨质疏松症
骨密度
骨标志物
生活质量

Teriparatide
Osteoporosis
Bone mineral density
Bone markers
Quality of life

作者
姜红峰
彭绍蓉
黄蔡华

JIANG Hongfeng
PENG Shaorong
HUANG Caihua