中国科技论文统计源期刊 中文核心期刊  
美国《化学文摘》《国际药学文摘》
《乌利希期刊指南》
WHO《西太平洋地区医学索引》来源期刊  
日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)
第七届湖北十大名刊提名奖  
医药导报, 2017, 36(9): 1015-1020
doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1004-0781.2017.09.017
慢性主观性头晕的发病机制及治疗进展*
袁天懿1,, 曹效平2, 查曹兵3

摘要:

慢性主观性头晕(CSD)是神经耳科学临床常见的一种疾病,它是以姿势相关的前庭症状和对诱发运动刺激的反应性为主的临床综合征。行为因素在CSD的发病过程中起重要作用,而威胁评估系统则是CSD病理生理机制的基础。基于CSD的身心交互模式,一些精神药物、心理和康复等治疗方法应用于临床,许多研究结果证实一些抗抑郁药、前庭平衡康复治疗和认知行为治疗对CSD有积极作用。该文就CSD的发病机制及其治疗现状进行综述。

关键词: 头晕,主观性,慢性 ; 发病机制 ; 治疗

Abstract:

近年来,神经耳科学领域发展迅速,如从简单的前庭-眼动反射功能评价到对平衡与姿势的复杂测试,以及影像诊断技术在临床中广泛使用等。然而,有些发病原因不明的头晕患者,尽管进行了全面的诊断性检测,其结果往往显示正常,无法通过神经耳科学疾病解释;既往将这类头晕笼统称之为“心因性”[1]。由于传统的“心因性头晕”概念及诊断标准缺乏相关的科学依据,也没有大量研究数据支持,因此不能及时识别和诊治。恐惧性姿势性眩晕(phobic postural vertigo,PPV)是一种姿势性头晕和波动性不稳感的临床状态,通常由暴露于环境或社会刺激引起(如桥梁、繁忙的街道、商店、拥挤的人群),以及由急性前庭障碍、医疗疾病或心理应激触发[2]。随后的研究发现,PPV是一个稳定的可识别的临床综合征,头晕和不稳感症状可有起伏,其整个纵向过程可能会持续数年之久,且2/3的患者临床上伴发显著的焦虑或抑郁[3-4]。2007年,STAAB等[5]改进了该综合征的诊断标准,将触发事件和共病状况进行归类,并重新命名为慢性主观性头晕(chronic subjective dizziness,CSD)。在进一步的调查研究中,逐渐明确了CSD的发病机制及治疗策略,证实了CSD是心身双向交互作用而导致的一种功能障碍[2,6-16]。在这些研究成果的基础上,国际前庭疾病分类经过讨论,决定整合PPV和CSD的核心症状特征,提出了持续性姿势-知觉性头晕综合征(syndrome of persistent postural-perceptual dizziness,PPPD)的疾病体诊断概念[17]。由于PPPD是一种新的疾病体名称,相关临床数据和文献很少,因此,笔者仍以CSD为主题,对CSD发病机制及治疗方面进行阐述。

1 CSD的概述

在国外三级神经耳科学中心,CSD是前庭症状患者中第二大常见诊断,30%~50%的前庭障碍患者可发生CSD[18]。其主要症状是持续的摇晃或摇摆不稳感、非眩晕性头晕,或两者兼有;在大多数情况下,不稳感和头晕持续整天,严重程度可有波动;典型的CSD是在急性前庭综合征后(如前庭神经炎)或发作性前庭综合征复发期间(如前庭型偏头痛)发展而来,其他躯体或精神疾病(如晕厥、惊恐发作),因严重破坏平衡功能或头晕也可以诱发CSD。CSD是一种典型的慢性疾病,青春期至成年后期均可发病,但40~50岁常见,大部分为女性(65%~70%)[19],症状常持续数月或数年,平均病程为4.5年[7]。60%的CSD患者存在有临床意义的焦虑,45%有临床意义的抑郁,尽管焦虑和抑郁在CSD患者中常见,但仍有25%的患者既无焦虑也无抑郁[7],并且CSD的焦虑和抑郁发生率与其他前庭障碍之间的差异不具有特异性,因此,它们不是诊断CSD的必要条件,但可以共病。

2 CSD的发病机制
2.1 人格特质

STAAB等[6]采用NEO个性问卷修订本(NEO Personality Inventory-Revised,NEO-PI-R)对CSD和其他前庭功能障碍伴发焦虑(如前庭型偏头痛与广泛性焦虑障碍)的两组患者进行比较,发现CSD组患者较对照组更可能具有显著的焦虑、内向型气质,即高焦虑特质和低外向型评分。TSCHAN等[15]也进行了相应的研究,对58例急性前庭功能障碍患者跟踪随访1年,发现心理弹性、生活满意度和心理一致感评分较高的患者发展成为PPV的可能性较小。这些证据表明,内向型与高焦虑特质人格的个体发展为CSD的风险增加,而具有弹性、乐观、满足、自信的人格特质的个体发展为CSD的风险可能降低。尤其在急性疾病破坏平衡功能后,人格因素对发展成为CSD的风险有强烈的影响。

2.2 经典性-操作性条件反射假说

条件反射是个体固有的学习方式,环境或身体刺激通过条件刺激形成某种特异性反应。基于既往的研究,STAAB[7]描述了经典性和操作性条件反射假说,它是使CSD维持的主要病理生理机制。这一理论认为,新发的前庭疾病是一种特别强烈的非条件刺激,由于患者产生了较强的生理反应,往往伴随着高水平的焦虑,强化了条件过程;随后暴露于内部或外部的运动刺激,进一步提高了姿势和眼球运动反应敏感性,并触发了提高姿势控制挑战的意识,从而强化姿势反射的高敏感性反应。操作性条件反射同时强化了行为,如回避登高或导致平衡不稳的活动。经典性条件反射是对运动刺激产生警觉增高和自主反应增强的机制;而操作性条件反射是头晕相关行为改变的机制。

认知过程中的认知歪曲也被认为强化CSD,通过对前庭症状潜在后果的灾难性想法和反复的焦虑性思考维持对头晕的意识性专注,进一步强化了条件反射的不利作用,增加了日常生活能力的残障[20]

2.3 平衡控制通路与威胁评估系统交互反应假说

CSD的经典性和操作性条件反射构想是基于普遍接受的认知行为理论,然而,支持该假说的具体研究数据尚不足。相反,一些证据支持另一种生物学存在机制,即平衡控制通路与威胁系统交互反应敏感性增高。

威胁评估系统所引发的威胁反应在焦虑症、惊恐障碍发病过程中起重要作用,也是CSD病理生理过程中的一个重要组成部分,神经解剖学的临床研究也显示了从脑干至皮质的多个神经通路,通过威胁评估影响姿势控制和运动[2]。焦虑不仅是空间知觉或运动的原因和结果,也是人体威胁评估系统对所感觉到的威胁产生的表现之一。当人体威胁评估系统感知到威胁或恐惧时会产生不同程度的焦虑,焦虑状态是个体恐惧性警觉水平的体现,是焦虑障碍影响前庭反射、平衡功能、躯体姿势与眼动控制的基础,因此,该系统又称之为威胁-焦虑系统[20]

外周和中枢前庭通路本身没有威胁感受器直接感知威胁,但威胁评估系统在从皮质至脑干的重要神经网点与前庭系统发生联系,所以前庭系统受行为因素影响,而行为因素是控制步态、姿势、眼动的神经系统的重要组成部分[20]。2013年,STAAB等[2]提出了平衡控制通路与威胁系统交互反应模型,阐述了行为神经耳科学疾病发病机制。该模型包括①感觉终末器官,检测运动刺激;②前庭中枢通路,特别是那些负责多感觉整合前庭中枢;③杏仁核和边缘皮质,在威胁评估和情绪调节中发挥关键作用;④前额叶皮质,包括运动自主控制和姿势风险的意识评估;⑤脑干自主神经核,调节自主神经反应。运用该模型可以解释以下3个行为神经耳科学问题:①恐惧跌倒,当感知恐惧后,恐惧性认知过程(皮质-杏仁核通路)激活了不必要的维持威胁相关活动的姿势控制机制(杏仁核-前庭中枢通路);②CSD,在应对急性前庭综合征的威胁机制(杏仁核-前庭中枢通路)完成之后,不能通过多感觉整合过程的调整使威胁反应消失,无法重新适应已恢复正常的躯体状态,平衡控制系统长期不能回归正常功能,导致CSD;③焦虑障碍,从皮质至脑干的所有区域都受到广泛的影响。

3 CSD的治疗

由于CSD是处于神经耳科学与精神病学交界面的一种临床综合征,且传统的前庭疾病干预措施在CSD的治疗中效果不佳,基于CSD的身心交互模式特点,一些精神药物、心理和康复等治疗方法应用于临床。其中选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制药(selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors,SSRIs)、5-羟色胺去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制药(serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors,SNRIs)、认知行为疗法(cognitive behavioral therapy,CBT)和前庭平衡康复疗法(vestibular and balance rehabilitation therapy,VBRT)受到国内外学者更多的关注,并进行了大量的研究[7-10,12-14,16,21-37]

3.1 神经精神药物治疗

主要为SSRIs和SNRIs药物。SSRIs和SNRIs是目前被认为治疗焦虑障碍的一线药物,一些小样本的临床试验支持其对慢性头晕的治疗作用。STAAB等[8]采用SSRI(包括舍曲林、帕罗西汀、氟西汀、西酞普兰)用于60例慢性头晕患者,疗程至少20周,结果显示在意向治疗分析中,63.3%患者(38/60)对药物治疗的耐受情况较好,且84.2%患者(32/38)疗效达到显著进步,15.8%(6/38)疗效达到进步。随后STAAB等[9]又对24例病程超过6个月CSD患者进行为期16周的前瞻性开放标签的临床试验,给予舍曲林进行治疗,剂量范围25~200 mg·d-1。结果显示,在第8周时,眩晕残障程度评定量表各项评分有显著改善,并且持续改善直至研究结束。治疗后第16周,心理压力、焦虑、抑郁等指标有显著改善。HORII等[12]采用帕罗西汀针对头晕患者的抑郁症状和主观障碍进行了一项为期8周的前瞻性研究,将47例头晕患者按照是否伴有器质性疾病和抑郁自评量表评分高低分为4组,均接受帕罗西汀20 mg·d-1治疗,结果显示在器质性疾病伴高抑郁组,帕罗西汀不仅能改善头晕导致的主观障碍,同时明显改善抑郁症状,在非器质性疾病伴高抑郁组,帕罗西汀也能改善情绪问题因子和抑郁自评量表评分。HORII等[14]在先前研究的基础上,于3年后又进行了两项前瞻性开放标签的临床试验研究,一项采用氟伏沙明治疗伴或不伴神经耳科疾病的慢性头晕患者,观察其焦虑、抑郁及主观障碍的疗效,另一项使用了相同的研究设计,采用米那普仑治疗了40例CSD患者,也得到了类似的结果[7]。SIMON等[13]一项为期12周的氟西汀治疗前庭功能障碍伴发焦虑的前瞻性试验研究,氟西汀剂量范围在20~60 mg·d-1,结果显示氟西汀能减少焦虑和头晕相关的损害,显著减少焦虑的敏感性和抑郁评分,而一般焦虑和头晕导致损害的评分的减少接近统计学差异。近几年来,不断又有新的研究[1,10,16,21-23],进一步验证了SSRIs和SNRIs在CSD中的临床疗效及安全性。

在这些药物研究中,大多数患者的前庭障碍为已缓解了的既往或复发性前庭疾病,进入研究时前庭疾病是相对静止的。唯一例外的是一项文拉法辛治疗CSD患者共病活动性前庭型偏头痛的试验研究[10],入组32例,其中20例伴有焦虑障碍,12例不伴焦虑障碍,最终24例完成临床试验,意向治疗分析显示,57%的患者取得较好疗效,在完成试验的病例中,70.8%(17/24)的患者治疗反应较好,其中伴有焦虑障碍患者的治疗反应率、头晕、头痛及焦虑的改善程度均优于不伴焦虑障碍患者。这表明,在文拉法辛可能通过焦虑相关而不是偏头痛相关的神经机制发挥其治疗的作用。近期一项关于慢性头晕共病精神障碍的研究[23],比较了米那普仑(50 mg·d-1)与氟伏沙明(200 mg·d-1)之间的疗效差异,结果显示两药之间的整体疗效没有差异。然而,米那普仑组治疗后/治疗前的主观障碍比例<80%的患者比例较氟伏沙明组更高。此研究表明,如果SSRI治疗反应不佳,SNRI药物米那普仑可以作为伴发精神障碍的慢性头晕患者的治疗选择。

笔者目前尚未见SSRIs和SNRIs治疗CSD的大样本随机对照研究数据,但STAAB等[7]综合了既往的研究数据,显示在60%~70%参与临床试验和80%完成了至少8~12周治疗的患者中,CSD主要症状至少减轻一半;因药物不耐受而退出的发生率平均为20%,SSRIs和SNRIs典型的不良反应为恶心、失眠、性功能障碍等,其发生率与药物其他适应证的研究报道一致。另外,SSRIs和SNRIs可降低杏仁核对威胁刺激的反应,并影响第二级前庭神经元的活动性,其中85%神经元对前庭神经核内5-羟色胺张力水平改变有反应[24],SSRIs和SNRIs可能通过杏仁核和中枢前庭通路在两个层面对CSD发挥治疗作用。因此,无论从神经病理生理角度,还是从临床研究结果,都为SSRIs和SNRIs作为CSD的主要药物治疗提供了必要的依据。

3.2 VBRT

VBRT是针对病因治疗后所遗留的各种前庭功能障碍,使用专业化的康复训练手段,促进前庭适应和代偿的建立,从而达到改善和恢复前庭功能的目的[20]。VBRT对前庭功能障碍和慢性头晕的疗效及价值在既往的临床实践中不断得到肯定。WHITNEY等[25]对23例20~40岁的前庭障碍患者与23例60~80岁的老年人在性别、前庭诊断、前庭功能测试结果相匹配,入组患者均接受前庭康复治疗,结果显示所有入组患者中,49%患者经过前庭康复治疗后头晕症状有改善,但两组患者头晕症状有改善程度差异无统计学意义,提示年龄不是影响前庭康复治疗效果的关键因素。2004年,YARDLEY等[26]的一项前庭康复治疗慢性头晕患者的单盲随机对照试验,将170例成人慢性头晕患者随机分为两组,分别进行前庭康复(n=83)和常规医疗干预(n=87)。结果显示治疗后3个月,前庭康复组所有主要评估结果的改善程度前明显优于常规医疗干预组,且这种改善维持到6个月。研究表明前庭康复训练能改善慢性头晕患者的头晕症状、姿势的稳定性及头晕相关障碍。

VBRT不仅能改善慢性头晕患者的躯体症状和功能障碍,还能对患者伴发的情绪或心理症状产生积极作用。MATHESON等[27]研究发现,当前庭系统功能的退化程度超过了神经系统的代偿能力时,头晕和其他前庭障碍可能会发展。如果头晕持续,能产生较严重的心理结局,并可能导致焦虑障碍的发生。前庭康复训练有助于减少与年龄相关的前庭系统功能的退化,并能改善心理症状。2007年,MELI等[28]研究显示,将80例慢性头晕伴焦虑抑郁症状的患者分为两组,一组患者给予前庭康复训练,另一组不予治疗(同样不予药物和认知行为治疗)。结果显示心理因素影响慢性头晕患者的残障水平,平衡不稳感影响焦虑、抑郁水平,前庭康复不仅减轻头晕症状,提高稳定性,而且焦虑和抑郁水平显著下降。表明在不使用药物或心理治疗情况下,前庭康复治疗对慢性前庭功能障碍患者的情绪状态有积极影响。

一般认为,VBRT的治疗作用是促进对外周或中枢前庭功能不足的代偿。然而,STAAB等[29]回顾了VBRT既往的研究,认为它可以通过一个完全不同的机制发挥其治疗作用,而这一机制更适用于CSD患者,即VBRT通过习服或脱敏训练模式,逆转对运动刺激的经典条件的超敏反应,以及在步态与姿态中操作条件的改变。既往没有专门针对CSD而设立的VBRT研究。直到最近一些针对CSD或PPPD的小样本研究验证了VBRT的作用[21-22,30-31],其中一项是关于PPPD的小样本研究,THOMPSON等[30]回顾性分析和电话随访形式评价VBRT对PPPD的疗效,26例PPPD患者在接受PPPD和以家庭为基础的VBRT教育培训后,进行平均27.5个月的电话随访。结果显示26例PPPD中,发现22例物理治疗咨询有帮助,14例VBRT有效。在14例VBRT有效的PPPD中,7例头部/身体运动敏感得到缓解,5例视觉刺激敏感缓解,还有4例完全缓解。由于CSD与PPPD本质上是属于同一疾病体,因此该研究结果同样适用于CSD。另外,近几年来,3项国内研究[21-22,31]显示,前庭康复训练不仅能够有效改善CSD患者的躯体、情绪症状,促进功能恢复,而且在联合药物、心理治疗时,存在较好的附加效应。

3.3 认知行为疗法(CBT)

CBT由行为治疗和认知治疗的整合而成,是指通过一种目标导向的、系统的程序,主要目的是解决情绪、认知和行为的障碍,提高和改善其功能水平。迄今,针对CSD的心理治疗报道较少,这些研究的规模较小,其中多数研究包含了针对焦虑障碍的认知行为模式的元素,只是在治疗持续时间和内容方面有所不同。1994年,BRANDT等[32]随访了78例接受规范治疗的PPV患者,在接受指导和治疗后进行为期6个月至5.5年的评估(平均随访时间2.5年),治疗措施采用了是以减轻对症状的恐惧为目的。在随访期间,50%患者症状大幅度改善。由于缺少对照组,使结论存在一定程度局限性。此后两项小样本的随机对照研究评价了前庭神经康复联合CBT的治疗效果。2001年,JOHANSSON等[33]评估一组实施超过5次以上CBT的老年人(>65岁)。受试者被随机分配到治疗组(n=9)和等待名单对照组(n=10)。治疗组采用前庭康复联合CBT。结果发现一些身体能力测试和DHI的残疾水平明显改善,但头晕、焦虑、抑郁症状无变化。2006年,ANDERSSON等[34]针对更年轻的个体(22~62岁)运用类似的治疗,但突出了认知的作用。治疗后结果再次显示身体能力测试和疾病残疾得到改善,头晕相关的痛苦伴随着治疗也有减轻,而焦虑、抑郁、压力和每日活动的信心测验没有变化。由于治疗包括VR和CBT,因此无法证实CBT是否产生独立的治疗作用,且缺乏随访数据。

为了进一步验证CBT的治疗作用,HOLMBERG等学者就针对PPV患者开展了两项关于CBT的研究[35-36]。一项是将39例PPV患者分为两组,自我治疗组进行健康教育和前庭康复训练,CBT组在健康教育和前庭康复训练基础上增加8~12次的CBT,研究结果表明CBT在改善PPV患者的功能障碍、焦虑、抑郁方面存在较好的附加效应[35]。但这些情况的改善在HOLMBERG等[36]1年后的随访研究中没有得到维持,表明CBT对PPV患者的长期疗效作用有限。

近几年来,两项关于CSD的认知行为治疗研究再次验证CBT在CSD临床治疗中的作用。一项是由EDELMAN等 [37]针对CSD的认知行为治疗进行的一项随机对照试验。将41例CSD患者随机分配到直接治疗组(n=20)和等待名单对照组(n=21)。采用惊恐障碍的CBT模型进行3周的心理治疗,结果显示功能障碍的显着减少、头晕及相关躯体症状减少、回避和安全行为减少,均与CBT的治疗作用相关。而抑郁、焦虑和压力量表测量的心理结果没有变化。另一项是由MAHONEY等[38]开展的相关研究,旨在探讨短程CBT对CSD患者的长期疗效,并试图确定治疗组患者功能残疾的预测因子。将44例CSD患者随机分配到CBT治疗组(n=23)和等待治疗对照组(n=21)。等待治疗对照组在CBT组治疗4周后完成CBT干预计划,并作为早期随机对照试验的一部分。两组采用了与EDELMAN等[37]研究中相同的治疗方案和评估工具,完成治疗后随访6个月。结果显示短程的CBT干预对CSD患者的躯体症状、残疾和功能损害均有改善,这种作用持续到治疗后1和6个月。治疗前的高焦虑水平的患者在治疗后6个月有更高的残疾水平。

3.4 中医药治疗

近年来国内学者开展了中医药治疗CSD的相关研究,显示其具有一定的临床价值。其中申斌等[39]针对CSD患者采用全息汤加减口服治疗,与氟西汀作对照,疗程4周,结果显示全息汤加减总有效率91.11%,优于对照组的73.33%,且无不良反应。陈宁等[40]在常规治疗(抗抑郁、抗焦虑、营养神经等)基础上,联合参松养心胶囊治疗CSD患者,疗程2个月,结果显示联合治疗组总有效率80%,优于常规治疗组的50%,且治疗过程中药物不良反应未增多。这些研究为中医药在CSD的临床治疗中提供了一定依据。

4 结束语

综上所述,CSD是三级神经耳科学中心第二个最常见的诊断,仅次于良性阵发性位置性眩晕。CSD是以姿势相关的前庭症状和对诱发运动刺激的反应性为主的临床综合征,它是处于神经耳科学和精神病学交界面的综合模式。CSD几乎总是由急性神经耳科学疾病、医疗或精神疾病引起的,临床病程通常是慢性的,症状波动的严重程度超过数月或数年。行为与神经耳科学因素是CSD的病理生理机制的关键要素,没有两者之间的交互作用,CSD就不可能存在。更重要的是,一些临床研究的结果证实SSRI和SNRI类抗抑郁药、CBT和VBRT在CSD治疗中的积极作用,另外,国内一些研究数据显示中医药在CSD的临床治疗中也具有一定的价值。然而,目前有关CSD的病理生理机制及诊断仍缺乏明确的生物标记物;CSD的临床治疗仍缺乏大样本随机对照研究数据,CSD的治疗方法在干预的性质、时间、方式、内容等方面也存在着较大的差异,有其各自的优势特点;基于当前心身医学的综合治疗模式理念,如何将SSRI和SNRI类药物、前庭康复、心理干预方法有机结合,或者联合其他有前景的治疗方法(如自律训练、生物反馈技术等),使治疗效果和整体效应发挥到最大,这些尚待解决的问题都为今后的研究提供了新的方向。

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

参考文献

[1] BITTAR R S,SOHSTEN LINS E M.Clinical characteristics of patients with persistent postural-perceptual dizziness[J].Braz J Otorhinolaryngol,2015,81(3):276-282.
[本文引用:2]
[2] STAAB J P,BALABAN C D,FURMAN J M.Threat assess-ment and locomotion:clinical applications of an integrated model of anxiety and postural control[J].Semin Neurol,2013,33(3):297-306.
Interactions between anxiety and vestibular symptoms have been described since the late 1800s. Typically, they have been conceptualized as bidirectional effects of one condition on the other (i.e., anxiety disorders as a cause of vestibular symptoms and vestibular disorders as a cause of anxiety symptoms). Over the past 30 years, however, a steady progression of neurophysiological investigations of gait and stance under conditions of postural threat, neuroanatomical studies of connections between threat assessment and vestibular pathways in the brain, and clinical research on anxiety-related vestibular conditions has offered the building blocks of a more integrated model. In this newer concept, threat assessment is an integral component of spatial perception, postural control, and locomotion in health and disease. It is not imposed on the vestibular system from the outside or simply reactive to vestibular dysfunction, but an inherently necessary part of every aspect of mobility. In this article, the authors review evidence that supports this model and then use it to examine common neurotologic conditions in which anxiety-related processes play important roles ear of falling, primary and secondary anxiety disorders in patients with vestibular symptoms, and chronic subjective dizziness.
DOI:10.1055/s-0033-1356462      URL    
[本文引用:4]
[3] KAPFHAMMER H P,MAYER C,HOCK U,et al.Course of illness in phobic postural vertigo[J].Acta Neurol Scand,1997,95(1):23-28.
Forty-two patients with phobic postural vertigo took part in a neurological and psychiatric follow-up study. During the follow-up time of about 2.5 years the neurological diagnosis remained stable (41 of 42 patients). PPV can be assigned to various psychiatric categories according to DSM-III-R. Although an association of PPV with anxiety disorders is evident, not all patients present with symptoms of anxiety or panic during attacks of vertigo. However most patients develop a disabling "phobic-avoidance pattern" with recurrent attacks. Important psychosocial stressors can be identified at the onset of the condition. Motives of secondary gain have also to be taken into consideration. The course of illness varies depending on the neurological syndrome of vertigo, on the one hand, and concomitant psychopathological syndromes, on the other. Despite a considerable rate of improvement in vertigo complaints (79%), the group of patients with phobic postural vertigo as a whole presented with significant psychological problems at follow-up term (74%), requiring specific psychiatric and/or psychotherapeutic interventions. Dependent or avoidant personality, and hypochondria were prognostic of a more negative course of illness.
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1997.tb00063.x      PMID:9048981      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[4] HUPPERT D,STRUPP M,RETTINGER N,et al.Phobic postural vertigo——a long-term follow-up (5 to 15 years) of 106 patients[J].J Neurol,2005,252(5):564-569.
Abstract One hundred and six patients diagnosed between 1987 and 1998 to have somatoform phobic postural vertigo were examined in a follow-up study with a self-evaluating questionnaire. The improvement rate after a mean follow-up time of 8.5 years (5 to 15.9 years) was 75% (27% of the patients reported a complete remission). While the majority of these patients experienced improvement or remission during the first year after assessment of diagnosis and a short-term psychotherapeutic approach, some patients also had considerable improvement even after two or more years. There was a negative correlation between the duration of the condition before assessment of the diagnosis and the improvement/regression rate. The improvement/regression rate was independent of gender, age, preceding vestibular or non-vestibular organic disorders, and the various medical, physical, or psychotherapeutic interventions. Transient relapses occurred in 47% of the improved patients once or repeatedly. The probability of developing a relapse remained constant throughout the entire follow-up. None of the patients required a revision of the initial diagnosis on the basis of the questionnaire.
DOI:10.1007/s00415-005-0699-x      PMID:15742115      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[5] STAAB J P,RUCKENSTEIN M J.Expanding the different-ial diagnosis of chronic dizziness[J].Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2007,133(2):170-176.
To improve treatment outcomes for patients with chronic dizziness by identifying clinical conditions associated with persistent symptoms and delineating key diagnostic features that differentiate its causes and direct attention to specific treatments. Prospective cohort study from 1998 to 2004. Tertiary care balance center. A total of 345 men and women, aged 15 to 89 years, referred for evaluation of chronic dizziness (duration of > or =3 months) of uncertain cause. Patients were systematically directed through multiple specialty examinations until definitive diagnoses were made. Final diagnoses associated with dizziness. Nearly all patients with chronic subjective dizziness were diagnosed with psychiatric or neurologic illnesses. These included primary and secondary anxiety disorders (n = 206 [59.7%]) and central nervous system conditions (n = 133 [38.6%]), specifically migraine headaches, mild traumatic brain injuries, and neurally mediated dysautonomias. A small number of patients (6 [1.7%]) had dysrhythmias. Four of 5 patients with migraine or dysrhythmias had comorbid anxiety. Chronic dizziness has several common causes, including anxiety disorders, migraine, traumatic brain injuries, and dysautonomia, that require different treatments. Key features of the clinical history distinguish these illnesses from one another and from active neurotologic conditions. The high prevalence of secondary anxiety may give a false impression of psychogenicity.
DOI:10.1001/archotol.133.2.170      PMID:17309987      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[6] STAAB J P,ROHE D,EGGERS S,et al.Anxious,introvert-ed personality traits in chronic subjective dizziness[J].J Psychosom Res,2014,76(1):80-83.
Chronic subjective dizziness (CSD) is a neurotologic disorder of persistent non-vertiginous dizziness, unsteadiness, and hypersensitivity to one's own motion or exposure to complex visual stimuli. CSD usually follows acute attacks of vertigo or dizziness and is thought to arise from patients' failure to re-establish normal locomotor control strategies after resolution of acute vestibular symptoms. Pre-existing anxiety or anxiety diathesis may be risk factors for CSD. This study tested the hypothesis that patients with CSD are more likely than individuals with other chronic neurotologic illnesses to possess anxious, introverted personality traits.Data were abstracted retrospectively from medical records of 40 patients who underwent multidisciplinary neurotology evaluations for chronic dizziness. Twenty-four subjects had CSD. Sixteen had chronic medical conditions other than CSD plus co-existing anxiety disorders. Group differences in demographics, Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scores, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores, DSM-IV diagnoses, personality traits measured with the NEO Personality Inventory - Revised (NEO-PI-R), and temperaments composed of NEO-PI-R facets were examined.There were no differences between groups in demographics, mean DHI or HADS-anxiety scores, or DSM-IV diagnoses. The CSD group had higher mean HADS-depression and NEO-PI-R trait anxiety, but lower NEO-PI-R extraversion, warmth, positive emotions, openness to feelings, and trust (all p<0.05). CSD subjects were significantly more likely than comparison subjects to have a composite temperament of high trait anxiety plus low warmth or excitement seeking.An anxious, introverted temperament is strongly associated with CSD and may be a risk factor for developing this syndrome.
DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.11.008      PMID:24360146      URL    
[本文引用:2]
[7] STAAB J P.Chronic subjective dizziness[J].Continuum,2012,18(5):1118-1141.
[本文引用:6]
[8] STAAB J P,RUCKENSTEIN M J,SOLOMON D,et al.Ser-otonin reuptake inhibitors for dizziness with psychiatric symptoms[J].Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2002,128(5):554-560.
To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for the treatment of patients with dizziness and major or minor psychiatric symptoms, with or without neurotologic illnesses. Review of 60 consecutive cases of patients with dizziness who were treated with an SSRI for at least 20 weeks during the 30-month period from July 1998 to December 2000. Tertiary care, multidisciplinary referral center. Sixty men and women, aged 13 to 81 years, with (1) psychogenic dizziness, (2) dizziness due to a neurotologic condition, as well as significant psychiatric symptoms, or (3) idiopathic dizziness. Open-label treatment with an SSRI titrated to 1 of 3 end points: optimal clinical benefit, intolerable adverse effects, or no therapeutic response. Change in dizziness and psychiatric symptoms measured by the 7-point, clinician-rated, Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale. Thirty-eight (63%) of 60 patients in the intent-to-treat sample and 32 (84%) of 38 patients who completed treatment improved substantially. The response rates did not differ between patients with major psychiatric disorders and those with lesser psychiatric symptoms. Patients whose only diagnosis was a psychiatric disorder and those with coexisting peripheral vestibular conditions or migraine headaches fared better than patients with central nervous system deficits. Before being treated with an SSRI, two thirds of the study patients took meclizine hydrochloride and/or benzodiazepines, with minimal benefit. Treatment with SSRIs relieved dizziness in patients with major or minor psychiatric symptoms, including those with peripheral vestibular conditions and migraine headaches. Patients fared far better with SSRI treatment than with treatment with vestibular suppressants or benzodiazepines.
DOI:10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03085_16.x      PMID:12003587      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[9] STAAB J P,RUCKENSTEIN M J,AMSTERDAM J D.A prospective trial of sertraline for chronic subjective dizziness[J].Laryngoscope,2004,114(9):1637-1641.
Objectives/Hypothesis: The authors previously reported that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) reduce chronic subjective dizziness in patients with and without psychiatric illnesses. To extend those preliminary findings and test the hypothesis that SSRIs may offer a novel treatment for chronic subjective dizziness, the authors conducted a prospective study of sertraline in patients with dizziness for more than 6 months, in the absence of active physical neurotologic illness. Study Design: Sixteen-week, prospective, open-label, flexible-dose clinical trial. Methods: Twenty-four patients with subjective dizziness for more than 6 months and no active physical neurotologic illness were studied. Eighteen patients had major anxiety disorders. Six had minor frustration or worry that did not warrant a psychiatric diagnosis. Sertraline was administered at a daily dose of 25 mg, which was increased to a maximum daily dose of 200 mg. Dizziness, functional impairment, and psychological distress were measured using the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and Brief Symptom Inventory-53 (BSI-53). Treatment outcomes were analyzed using repeated-measures multivariate analyses of variance, with last observations carried forward. Results: Three patients were excluded from data analysis for disqualifying medical conditions, one for protocol violations. Fifteen (75%) patients completed treatment. Five (25%) withdrew for adverse effects or lack of efficacy. The median daily dose of sertraline was 100 mg. Sertraline significantly reduced scores on all three DHI subscales and the BSI-53. Eleven of 15 (73%) patients who completed treatment had a positive response, including 8 of 11 (73%) with major anxiety disorders and 3 of 4 (75%) with no psychopathological conditions. Six patients enjoyed a full remission of symptoms. Conclusion: Sertraline significantly reduced chronic subjective dizziness in patients without active physical neurotologic illness, including those with and without psychiatric comorbidity.
DOI:10.1097/00005537-200409000-00025      PMID:15475796      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[10] STAAB J P.Clinical clues to a dizzying headache[J].J Vestib Res,2011,21(6):331-340.
Recent years have witnessed an upsurge of interest in migraine as a cause of vestibular symptoms. Starting with 1970s case reports linking migraine to childhood vertigo, neurotologists worldwide have increasingly diagnosed migraine. Various syndromes of vestibular migraine (VM) have been described, diagnostic criteria proposed, epidemiologic data collected, and neurophysiologic models developed. Yet, the concept that migraine causes vestibular symptoms rests on a surprisingly thin research database. Current concepts of VM are based on expert opinion, not empirical data. No general consensus exists about the definition of VM. No studies have analyzed its essential features. Just one well-controlled medication trial has been published. No biomarkers are known. To stimulate more rigorous research, this paper poses three questions about clinical investigations into migraine and vestibular symptoms: What variables should be measured? What patients should be studied? How might clinical trials yield both clinically useful results and greater insights into pathophysiologic processes? Using these questions, the limits of current knowledge are explored. Applicable research methods from epidemiology to genetics are examined. Pilot data demonstrating pharmacologic and genetic dissection techniques are presented. Ambitious, but practical, near-term clinical research goals are enumerated, including rigorous validation of diagnostic criteria and development of empirically derived management guidelines.
DOI:10.3233/VES-2011-0426      PMID:22348938      URL    
[本文引用:3]
[11] STAAB J P,RUCKENSTEIN M J.Which comes first? Psy-chogenic dizziness versus otogenic anxiety[J].Laryngoscope,2003,113(10):1714-1718.
URL    
[本文引用:0]
[12] HORII A,MITANI K,KITAHARA T,et al.Paroxetine,a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor,reduces depressive symptoms and subjective handicaps in patients with dizziness[J].Otol Neurotol,2004,25(4):536-543.
Abstract OBJECTIVE AND STUDY DESIGN: When treating dizzy patients, the psychiatric aspect should be carefully addressed regardless of whether a well-defined organic disease is present. In this prospective study, we aimed to elucidate the role of paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, in the treatment of dizziness. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Forty-seven patients who complained of dizziness were treated with 20 mg of paroxetine per day. The depressive state of the patient was evaluated by the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). Treatment outcomes were measured with self-assessment of subjective handicaps in daily life using a dizziness and unsteadiness questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of five factors related to emotional or bodily dysfunction that could be affected by dizziness. Changes in Self-Rating Depression Scale scores and subjective handicaps were assessed at 4 and 8 weeks after the start of paroxetine. RESULTS: In patients having well-defined organic diseases with high Self-Rating Depression Scale scores, paroxetine improved all five subjective handicap factors as well as Self-Rating Depression Scale scores. The decline in Self-Rating Depression Scale scores showed a significant correlation with improvement of subjective handicaps, which was related to emotional problems but not factors related to bodily dysfunction. Paroxetine was also effective for an improvement of factors related to emotional problems and Self-Rating Depression Scale scores in patients not having organic diseases but with high Self-Rating Depression Scale scores. In patients either with or without organic diseases with low Self-Rating Depression Scale scores, paroxetine had no effect on any subjective handicap factors and Self-Rating Depression Scale scores. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of dizzy patients, paroxetine was effective at relieving subjective handicaps caused by dizziness, specifically, in patients with high Self-Rating Depression Scale scores.
DOI:10.1002/mana.200310459      PMID:15241233      URL    
[本文引用:2]
[13] SIMON N M,PARKER SW,WERNICK-ROBINSON M,et al.Fluoxetine for vestibular dysfunction and anxiety:a prospective pilot study[J].Psychosomatics,2005,46(4):334-339.
Abstract Anxiety states and disorders amplify the symptoms and impairment associated with vestibular dysfunction. Five patients with inner ear vestibular dysfunction and anxiety were prospectively treated with fluoxetine, 20-60 mg/day, and received an extensive battery of assessments at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Fluoxetine led to significant or near significant reductions in anxiety measures and in impairment due to dizziness; improvements in clinical balance function and vestibular function were less clear. The data add to the literature suggesting a role for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of dizziness and anxiety.
DOI:10.1176/appi.psy.46.4.334      PMID:16000676      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[14] HORII A,UNO A,KITAHARA T,et al.Effects of fluvoxa-mine on anxiety,depression,and subjective handicaps of chronic dizziness patients with or without neuro-otologic diseases[J].J Vestib Res,2007,17(1):1-8.
Abstract A prospective, open-label clinical trial was conducted for two aims: first, to evaluate the role of fluvoxamine, one of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, in the treatment of dizziness for the first time and to investigate its effective mechanisms. Second, to test the hypothesis that dizziness in patients without abnormal neuro-otologic findings would be induced by psychiatric disorders rather than by unnoticed neuro-otologic diseases. Nineteen patients with neuro-otologic diseases (Group I) and 22 patients in whom standard vestibular tests revealed no abnormal findings (Group II) were treated by fluvoxamine (200 mg/day) for eight weeks. Subjective handicaps due to dizziness using a questionnaire, anxiety and depressive symptoms measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and stress hormones (vasopressin and cortisol) were examined before and 8 weeks after treatment. Overall, fluvoxamine decreased subjective handicaps of both Groups I and II. Fluvoxamine decreased HADS of only patients whose subjective handicaps were reduced (=responders) in both groups, suggesting that fluvoxamine was effective for dizziness via psychiatric action rather than a recovery of vestibular function through serotonergic activation. In non-responders of Group II, pre-treatment HADS was higher than in Group I non-responders and it was not decreased by the treatment, suggesting that dizziness of Group II non-responders was due to severe psychiatric disorders rather than unnoticed neuro-otologic diseases. Anxiety and depression components of HADS showed a good correlation at both pre- and post-treatment periods. No post-therapeutic decrease was observed in either vasopressin or cortisol even in responders, suggesting that dizziness was not the sole cause of stress in chronic dizziness patients. In conclusion, patients with or without physical neuro-otologic deficits who report chronic dizziness accompanied by anxiety and depression (as measured by HADS) showed improvements across a full range of subjective handicaps and psychological distress, while patients with physical neuro-otologic defects and minimal anxiety or depression did not benefit. The main causes of dizziness in patients without physical neuro-otologic findings were psychiatric disorders.
DOI:10.1017/S1355617707070221      PMID:18219099      URL    
[本文引用:2]
[15] TSCHAN R,BEST C,BEUTEL ME,et al.Patients’ psyc-hological well-being and resilient coping protect from secondary somatoform vertigo and dizziness (SVD) 1 year after vestibular disease[J].J Neurol,2011,258(1):104-112.
Secondary somatoform dizziness and vertigo (SVD) is an underdiagnosed and handicapping psychosomatic disorder, leading to extensive utilization of health care and maladaptive coping. Few long-term follow-up studies have focused on the assessment of risk factors and little is known about protective factors. The aim of this 1-year follow-up study was to identify neurootological patients at risk for the development of secondary SVD with respect to individual psychopathological disposition, subjective well-being and resilient coping. In a prospective interdisciplinary study, we assessed mental disorders in n = 0259 patients with peripheral and central vestibular disorders ( n = 0215 benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, n = 0215 vestibular neuritis, n = 028 Menière’s disease, n = 0224 vestibular migraine) at baseline (T0) and 102year after admission (T1). Psychosomatic examinations included the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV, the Vertigo Symptom Scale (VSS), and a psychometric test battery measuring resilience (RS), sense of coherence (SOC), and satisfaction with life (SWLS). Subjective well-being significantly predicted the development of secondary SVD: Patients with higher scores of RS, SOC, and SWLS at T0 were less likely to acquire secondary SVD at T1. Lifetime mental disorders correlated with a reduced subjective well-being at T0. Patients with mental comorbidity at T0 were generally more at risk for developing secondary SVD at T1. Patients’ dispositional psychopathology and subjective well-being play a major predictive role for the long-term prognosis of dizziness and vertigo. To prevent secondary SVD, patients should be screened for risk and preventive factors, and offered psychotherapeutic treatment in case of insufficient coping capacity.
DOI:10.1007/s00415-010-5697-y      PMID:20717689      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[16] GOTO F,TSUTSUMI T,OGAWA K.Treatment of chronic subjective dizziness by SSRIs[J].Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho,2013,116(11):1208-1213.
It has been reported that the dizziness or vertigo in about 10 to 30 patients visiting an otolaryngologist is of psychiatric origin. Since otolaryngologists are not familiar with the treatment for these patients, such treatment is usually not adequate. The clinical entity of chronic subjective dizziness (CSD) is one of psychiatric dizziness proposed by Staab and Ruckenstein. Fourteen percent (40/285) of patients were diagnosed as having psychiatric dizziness in Hino Municipal Hospital last year. Among them we had 7 cases with CSD. We report herein on the result of the clinical examinations and pharmacological treatment. In most of the cases, subjective symptoms were significantly improved after the pharmacological treatment with SSRIs (Serotonin reuptake inhibitors). From these results, CSD is important clinical entity treatable by otolaryngologist with SSRIs. To prescribe SSRIs, it is important to know the common adverse reactions associated with SSRIs. These include gastrointestinal symptoms including nausea and activation syndromes especially in early stage of treatment. CSD is an important clinical entity, which should be diagnosed and is treatable by otolaryngologists.
DOI:10.3950/jibiinkoka.116.1208      PMID:24397118      URL    
[本文引用:3]
[17] STAAB J P,ECKHARDT-HENN A,HORII A,et al.prog-ress report of the behavioral subcommittee of the committee on classification of the barany society[J].J Vestib Res,2014,24(2):93-94.
[本文引用:1]
[18] 田军茹. 精神源性眩晕[J].临床医学进展,2012,2(2):11-16.
[本文引用:1]
[19] RUCKENSTEIN M J,STAAB J P.Chronic subjective dizziness[J].Otolaryngol Clin North Am,2009,42(1):71-77.
[本文引用:1]
[20] 田军茹. 眩晕诊治[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2015:269-286.
[本文引用:4]
[21] 袁天懿,唐建良,秦玲,.前庭康复训练联合艾司西酞普兰对慢性主观性头晕的早期疗效观察[J].浙江临床医学杂志,2016,18(2):318-319.
目的:分析前庭康复训练联合艾司西酞普兰治疗对慢性主观性头晕的早期疗效。方法:收治慢性主观性头晕患者100例,均服用艾司西酞普兰,观察组给予前庭康复训练干预,比较观察组与对照组患者眩晕残疾、情绪阻碍量化及有效率。结果:观察组的DHI及HAMA低于对照组,观察组的眩晕改善率96.0%,高于对照组的80.0%(P0.05)。结论:前庭康复训练联合艾司西酞普兰治疗对慢性主观性头晕的早期疗效具有显著效果。
URL    
[本文引用:2]
[22] 袁天懿,查曹兵,曹效平,.艾司西酞普兰治疗慢性主观性头晕32例[J].医药导报,2016,35(3):272-275.
目的:探讨艾司西酞普兰治疗慢性主观性头晕的疗效与安全性。方法将90例慢性主观性头晕患者随机分为药物治疗组(32例)、前庭康复组(27例)和心理干预组(31例)。药物治疗组给予艾司西酞普兰10~20 mg?d-1, po;前庭康复组进行前庭功能康复训练;心理干预组进行认知行为疗法。疗程均为6周。治疗前后,3组患者分别进行眩晕残障程度评定量表( DHI)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表( HAMA)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表( HAMD)评定疗效。结果治疗6周后,3组间HAMA、HAMD、DHI总评分及各因子分均较治疗前显著下降( P0.05),但均明显低于心理干预组[分别为(43.86±12.48),(14.43±4.37),(17.57±4.37)分](P0.05),均明显低于前庭康复组[分别为(14.69±4.76),(14.96±4.77),(14.88±4.65)分](P<0.05,或P<0.01)。结论艾司西酞普兰可较全面改善慢性主观性头晕患者躯体、情感、功能等症状,前庭康复训练与认知行为疗法则有其各自的优势。
[本文引用:0]
[23] HORII A,IMAI T,KITAHARA T,et al.Psychiatric comor-bidities and use of milnacipran in patients with chronic dizziness[J].J Vestib Res,2016,26(3):335-340.
Abstract Psychiatric comorbidities are an important issue in the treatment of chronic dizziness patients. OBJECTIVE: To test the correlation between psychiatric status and subjective handicaps and to examine the effects of milnacipran on handicaps. METHODS: Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and handicaps were assessed by a questionnaire before and eight weeks after milnacipran treatment (50 mg/day) in 29 consecutive patients with chronic dizziness. Effects of milnaciplan were compared with fluvoxamine (200 mg/day). RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between anxious and depressive scale scores and also between HADS and handicaps. Duration of symptomswas longer in the anxious/depressive group(HADS 鈮 13) than in the non-anxious/depressive group. Handicaps and HADS were significantly decreased after treatment only in the anxious/depressive group. There were no overall differences in drug effects between milnaciplan and fluvoxamine. However, the rate of patients with a post/pre ratio of handicaps <80% was higher in milnaciplan group compared with the fluvoxamine group. CONCLUSIONS: Not only anxiety disorders but also depression should be considered as comorbid psychiatric disorders in patients with chronic dizziness. Dizzy patients with psychiatric comorbidities have a longer duration of symptoms and more handicaps than those without psychiatric disorders. Milnacipran may be chosen as a treatment for patients with chronic dizziness with comorbid psychiatric disorders in case of and insufficient response to SSRIs.
DOI:10.3233/VES-160582      PMID:27392838      URL    
[本文引用:2]
[24] LI VOLSI G,LICATA F,FRETTO G,et al.Influence of serotonin on the glutamate-induced excitations of secondary vestibular neurons in the rat[J].Exp Neurol,2001,172(2):446-459
The excitatory responses evoked by glutamate and its agonists in secondary vestibular neurons of the rat were studied during microiontophoretic application of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT). Ejection of 5-HT modified neuronal responsiveness to glutamate in 86% of the studied units, the effect being a depression of the excitatory responses in two-thirds of cases and an enhancement in the remaining third. 5-HT was also effective in modifying 94% of the responses evoked by N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA), inducing a depressive effect in 76% of cases and an enhancement in the remaining ones. Quisqualate-evoked effects were depressed and enhanced by 5-HT in about the same number of cases; in contrast, kainate-evoked responses were enhanced. The depressive action of 5-HT was mimicked by application of alpha-methyl-5-hydroxytryptamine (alpha-Me-5-HT), a 5-HT(2) receptor agonist, whereas the enhancing effect could be evoked by application of 8-hydroxy-2(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), a selective 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist. The 5-HT(2) receptor antagonist ketanserin was able to reduce, but not to block totally, the depressive action of 5-HT on glutamate- or NMDA-evoked responses. No significant difference was detected between neuronal responses in the lateral and the superior vestibular nucleus. These results indicate that 5-HT is able to modulate the responsiveness of secondary vestibular neurons to excitatory amino acids. Its action is mostly depressive, involves 5-HT(2) receptors, and is exerted on NMDA receptors. A minor involvement of other 5-HT receptors (at least 5-HT(1A)) and other glutamate receptors (for quisqualate and kainate) in the modulatory action of 5-HT is plausible.
DOI:10.1006/exnr.2001.7804      PMID:11716569      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[25] WHITNEY S L,WRISLEY D M,MARCHETTI G F,et al.The effect of age on vestibular rehabilitation outcomes[J].Laryngoscope,2002,112(10):1785-1790.
The purpose of the retrospective chart review was to compare vestibular rehabilitation outcomes in young versus older adults.Retrospective matched design.Twenty-three persons with vestibular disorders aged 20 to 40 years were matched by gender, vestibular diagnosis, and vestibular function test results to 23 older adults aged 60 to 80 years. The patients were treated with a custom-designed physical therapy exercise program. Patients completed the Dizziness Handicap Inventory, the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale, and the Dynamic Gait Index; number of falls; and rated the severity of their dizziness. The two-sample test, the Mann-Whitney test, and McNemar's test for correlated proportions were used to determine whether there was a difference in scores between the two age groups at the beginning and end of physical therapy.During the initial evaluation, older adults reported having statistically greater space and motion discomfort and more severe symptoms on a scale of 0 to 100. Younger adults had more impaired DGI scores and a higher proportion of caloric testing abnormalities. After rehabilitation, overall improvement was seen in both the younger and older populations. There were no statistical differences between the two groups on the DHI, the DGI, reported symptoms at discharge, or number of falls. When only the complete matched-pair data were analyzed, there were no statistically significant differences between the age groups in the proportion of patients demonstrating clinical improvement.Age does not significantly influence the beneficial effects of vestibular rehabilitation for persons with vestibular disorders.
DOI:10.1097/00005537-200210000-00015      PMID:12368616      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[26] YARDLEY L,DONOVAN-HALL M,SMITH H E,et al.Eff-ectiveness of primary care-based vestibular rehabilitation for chronic dizziness[J].Ann Intern Med,2004,141(8):598-605.
Background: Dizziness is a very common symptom and is usually managed in prima ry care. Vestibular rehabilitation for dizziness is a simple treatment that may be suitable for primary care delivery, but its effectiveness has not yet been de termined. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of nurse delivered vestibula r rehabilitation in primary care for patients with chronic dizziness. Design: Si ngle blind randomized, controlled trial. Setting: 20 general practices in south ern England. Patients: 170 adult patients with chronic dizziness who were random ly assigned to vestibular rehabilitation (n = 83) or usual medical care (n = 87) . Intervention: Each patient received one 30 to 40 minute appointment with a p rimary care nurse. The nurse taught the patient exercises to be carried out dail y at home, with the support of a treatment booklet. Measurements: Primary outcom e measures were baseline, 3 month, and 6 month assessment of self reported sp ontaneous and provoked symptoms of dizziness, dizzi ness related quality of li fe, and objective measurement of postural stability with eyes open and eyes clos ed. Results:At 3 months, improvement on all primary outcome measures in the vest ibular rehabilitation group was significantly greater than in the usual medical care group; this improvement was maintained at 6 months. Of 83 treated patients, 56 (67%) reported clinically significant improvement compared with 33 of 87 (3 8%) usual care patients (relative risk, 1.78 [95%CI, 1.31 to 2.42]). Limitat io ns: Psychological elements of the therapy may have contributed to outcomes, and the treatment may be effective only for well motivated patients. Conclusions: V estibular rehabilitation delivered by nurses in general practice improves sympto ms, postural stability, and dizziness related handicap in patients with chronic dizziness.
DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-141-8-200410190-00007      PMID:15492339      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[27] MATHESON A J,DARLINGTON C L,SMITH P F.Dizziness in the elderly and age-related degeneration of the vestibular system[J].N Z J Psychol,1999,28(1):10-16.
The peripheral and central vestibular systems exhibit an age-related structural deterioration which may be responsible for vestibular reflex deficits and dizziness in the elderly. However, it seems likely that the central nervous system is capable of compensating for a certain degree of decline in function, since not all elderly people are impaired to the extent that the clinical signs of vestibular dysfunction are apparent. Dizziness and other vestibular disorders may develop only when the degree of deterioration of the vestibular system exceeds the ability of the nervous system to compensate. If dizziness does eventuate, it can have profound psychological consequences, particularly in terms of loss of confidence in independent activity, and may lead to the development of anxiety disorders. Vestibular rehabilitation programs may help to minimise the effects of age-related deterioration of the vestibular system and its psychological impact.
DOI:10.1177/0022167899393010      PMID:11543297      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[28] MELI A,ZIMATORE G,BADARACCO C,et al.Effects of vestibular rehabilitation therapy on emotional aspects in chronic vestibular patients[J].J Psychosom Res,2007,63(2):185-190.
The VR therapy positively influences the emotional condition of chronic vestibular deficit patients without pharmacological or psychotherapy treatments.
DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.02.007      PMID:17662755      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[29] STAAB J P.Behavioral aspects of vestibular rehabilitation[J].NeuroRehabilitation,2011,29(2):179-183.
Behavioral factors are an integral part of the overall morbidity of patients with vertigo, dizziness, and balance disorders. Anxiety, depression, and more importantly, loss of balance confidence and sense of debility and handicap beleaguer patients with acute and chronic vestibular symptoms. Vestibular rehabilitation originated as a physical therapy, but a careful look at its research development and clinical applications show it to be as much, or perhaps more, a behavioral intervention. More patients referred for vestibular rehabilitation require habituation to chronic vestibular symptoms and motion sensitivity than compensation for active peripheral or central vestibular deficits. Vestibular rehabilitation may exert a positive effect on behavioral morbidity, but the benefits are somewhat uneven and do not always correlate with physical improvements. Health anxiety (i.e., excessive worry about the cause and consequences of physical symptoms) is an emerging concept in clinical psychiatry and psychology. It may offer an important key to understanding the debility and handicap experienced by many patients with vestibular symptoms and enhance the ability of vestibular rehabilitation to ameliorate their suffering.
DOI:10.3233/NRE-2011-0693      PMID:22027080      URL    
[本文引用:0]
[30] THOMPSON K J,GOETTING J C,STEEB J P,et al.Retro-spective review and telephone follow-up to evaluate a physical therapy protocol for treating persistent postural-perceptual dizziness:A pilot study[J].J Vestib Res,2015,25(2) :97-103.
Persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD) (formerly chronic subjective dizziness) may be treated using the habituation form of vestibular and balance rehabilitation therapy (VBRT), but therapeutic outcomes have not been formally investigated. This pilot study gathered the first data on the efficacy of VBRT for individuals with well-characterized PPPD alone or PPPD plus neurotologic comorbidities (vestibular migraine or compensated vestibular deficits). Twenty-six participants were surveyed by telephone an average of 27.5 months after receiving education about PPPD and instructions for home-based VBRT programs. Participants were queried about exercise compliance, perceived benefits of therapy, degree of visual or motion sensitivity remaining, disability level, and other interventions. Twenty-two of 26 participants found physical therapy consultation helpful. Fourteen found VBRT exercises beneficial, including 8 of 12 who had PPPD alone and 6 of 14 who had PPPD with co-morbidities. Of the 14 participants who found VBRT helpful, 7 obtained relief of sensitivity to head/body motion, 5 relief of sensitivity to visual stimuli, and 4 complete remission. Comparable numbers for the 12 participants who found VBRT not helpful were 1 (head/body motion), 3 (visual stimuli), and 0 (remission). This pilot study offers the first data supporting the habituation form of VBRT for treatment of PPPD.
DOI:10.3233/VES-150551      PMID:26410674      URL    
[本文引用:0]
[31] 李文辉,王丽.早期前庭康复训练在治疗慢性主观性头晕的临床应用[J].中国现代医生,2015,53(30):7-9.
目的观察早期前庭康复训练在慢性主观性头晕治疗中的作用。方法对我科自2013年12月~2014年6月收治的48例慢性主观性头晕患者进行对照分组,治疗组给予早期前庭康复训练及认知-行为治疗、抗焦虑药物治疗;对照组给予认知-行为治疗、抗焦虑药物治疗。量化对比观察两组患者经治疗2、4、8周后的疗效。结果两组患者基础DHI、HAMA、HAMD量表数据评价均通过方差齐性检验(P0.05)。两组患者经过治疗后眩晕残障及情绪障碍等均明显好转(P0.05)。以各量表总分的减分率作为疗效主要统计指标,两组间比较数据显示前庭康复治疗能使患者的头晕症状及焦虑等情绪在早期得到缓解,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论前庭康复训练在慢性主观性头晕治疗中具有重要补充作用,越早进行康复训练则疗效越好。
URL    
[本文引用:0]
[32] BRANDT T,HUPPERT D,DIETERICH M.Phobic postural vertigo:a first follow-up[J].J Neurol,1994,241(4):191-195.
Seventy-eight patients with phobic postural vertigo (PPV) and 17 patients with psychogenic disorder of stance and gait (PSG) were asked to evaluate their condition 6 months to 5.5 years after their original referral and short-term psychotherapy. Two results seem most important: (1) PPV had a favourable course with a 72% improvement rate (22% of patients becoming symptom free), whereas the majority of patients with PSG (52%) remained unchanged; (2) the majority of patients with PPV experienced complete remission or considerable improvement even if their condition had lasted between 1 and 20 years prior to diagnosis. Complete remission of PSG was observed only if the disorder had been present less than 4 months; there was no improvement if it had lasted longer than 2 years. PPV can be defined as a distinct clinical entity with a relatively benign course. It can be reliably diagnosed on the basis of typical features.
DOI:10.1007/BF00863767      PMID:8195816      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[33] JOHANSSON M,AKERLUND D,LARSON H C,et al.Randomised controlled trial of vestibular rehabilitation combined with cognitive behaviour therapy for dizziness in older people[J].Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2001,125(3):151-156.
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of vestibular rehabilitation combined with cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of dizziness in older people. Study Design and Setting: A randomized controlled design was used with patients recruited via an advertisement. Nine patients completed treatment and 10 served as waiting-list controls. The intervention lasted 7 weeks with 5 weekly group sessions and consisted of vestibular exercises. Cognitive behavioral therapy components were added to promote relaxation, reduce anxiety, and avoidance of feared situations and movements. Results: Statistically significant improvements on walking time, 2 dizziness provocative movements, and on the Dizziness Handicap Inventory, but no effects on the Romberg or anxiety and depression. Of the treated patients, 89% reached statistical significant improvement on the total inventory score. Conclusion: Cognitive behavioral therapy combined with vestibular rehabilitation decreases dizziness in older people. Significance: These findings indicate that cognitive behavioral therapy can be combined with vestibular rehabilitation in the treatment of dizziness. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;125:151-6.)
DOI:10.1067/mhn.2001.118127      PMID:11555746      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[34] ANDERSSON G,ASMUNDSON G J,DENEV J,et al.A controlled trial of cognitive behaviour therapy with vestibular rehabilitation in the treatment of dizziness[J].Behav Res Ther,2006,44(9):1265-1273.
URL    
[本文引用:1]
[35] HOLMBERG J,KARLBERG M,HARLACHER U,et al.Treatment of phobic postural vertigo.A controlled study of cognitive-behavioral therapy and self-controlled desensitization[J].J Neurol,2006,253(4):500-506.
In balance clinic practice, phobic postural vertigo is a term used to define a population with dizziness and avoidance behavior often as a consequence of a vestibular disorder. It has been described as the most common form of dizziness in middle aged patients in dizziness units. Anxiety disorders are common among patients with vestibular disorders. Cognitive-behavioral therapy is an effective treatment for anxiety disorders, and vestibular rehabilitation exercises are effective for vestibular disorders. This study compared the effect of additional cognitive-behavioral therapy for a population with phobic postural vertigo with the effect of self-administered vestibular rehabilitation exercises. 39 patients were recruited from a population referred for otoneurological investigation. Treatment effects were evaluated with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory, Vertigo Symptom Scale, Vertigo Handicap Questionnaire, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. All patients had a self treatment intervention based on education about the condition and recommendation of self exposure by vestibular rehabilitation exercises. Every second patient included was offered additional cognitive behavioral therapy. Fifteen patients with self treatment and 16 patients with cognitive- behavioral treatment completed the study. There was significantly larger effect in the group who received cognitive behavioral therapy than in the self treatment group in Vertigo Handicap Questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale and its subscales. Cognitive-behavioral therapy has an additional effect as treatment for a population with phobic postural vertigo. A multidisciplinary approach including medical treatment, cognitive-behavioral therapy and physiotherapy is suggested.
DOI:10.1007/s00415-005-0050-6      PMID:16362533      URL    
[本文引用:2]
[36] HOLMBERG J,KARLBERG M,HARLACHER U,et al.One-year follow-up of cognitive behavioral therapy for phobic postural vertigo[J].J Neurol,2007,254(9):1189-1192.
Abstract BACKGROUND: Phobic postural vertigo is characterized by dizziness in standing and walking despite normal clinical balance tests. Patients sometimes exhibit anxiety reactions and avoidance behavior to specific stimuli. Different treatments are possible for PPV, including vestibular rehabilitation exercises, pharmacological treatment, and cognitive behavioral therapy. We recently reported significant benefits of cognitive behavioural therapy for patients with phobic postural vertigo. This study presents the results of a one-year follow-up of these patients. METHODS: Swedish translations of the following questionnaires were administered: (Dizziness Handicap Inventory, Vertigo Symptom Scale, Vertigo Handicap Questionnaire, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) were administered to 20 patients (9 men and 11 women; mean age 43 years, range 23-59 years) one year after completion of cognitive behavioral therapy. RESULTS: Test results were similar to those obtained before treatment, showing that no significant treatment effects remained. CONCLUSION: Cognitive behavioral therapy has a limited long-term effect on phobic postural vertigo. This condition is more difficult to treat than panic disorder with agoraphobia. Vestibular rehabilitation exercises and pharmacological treatment might be the necessary components of treatment.
DOI:10.1007/s00415-007-0499-6      PMID:17676355      URL    
[本文引用:2]
[37] EDELMAN S,MAHONEY A E,CREMER P D.Cognitive behavior therapy for chronic subjective dizziness:a randomized,controlled trial[J].Am J Otolaryngol,2012,33(4):395-401.
A 3-session psychologic intervention based on the CBT model can produce significant improvements in dizziness-related symptoms, disability, and functional impairment among patients with chronic subjective dizziness. This suggests that treatment of this condition may be reasonably simple and cost-effective for most of the patients.
DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2011.10.009      PMID:22104568      URL    
[本文引用:3]
[38] MAHONEY A,EDELMAN S,D CREMER P.Cognitive behavior therapy for chronic subjective dizziness:longer-term gains and predictors of disability[J].Am J Otolaryngol,2013,34(2):115-120.
A brief CBT intervention for patients with CSD produced improvements in physical symptoms, disability, and functional impairment which were sustained at one month and six months post intervention. Patients with high levels of anxiety prior to treatment had higher levels of disability at six months post-treatment. It is possible that more focused interventions that specifically target anxiety might produce further benefits for this cohort.
DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.09.013      PMID:23177378      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[39] 申斌,于川,王磊,.全息汤加减治疗慢性主观性头晕临床疗效观察[J].世界中医药,2016,11(8):1465-1467.
目的:观察全息汤治疗慢性主观性头晕(Chronic Subjective Dizziness,CSD)的临床疗效。方法:将90例CSD患者随机分为治疗组(口服全息汤加减)和对照组(口服盐酸氟西汀胶囊)各45例,治疗4周为1个疗程。治疗前后采用眩晕残障程度量表(Dizziness Handicap Inventory,DHI)评估疗效。结果:2组治疗后DHI分项评分及总评分均较治疗前有显著改善(P0.05)。治疗组治疗后DHI功能、生理评分及总评分均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),而情感评分与对照组无统计学意义(P0.05)。对照组不良反应发生率为33.3%,而治疗组严格依照兼见症加减,未出现不良反应。结论:全息汤加减能够明显改善CSD患者以头晕为主诉的临床征候群,较好的帮助患者恢复了发病前的工作生活能力以及业余爱好,与常规西药治疗相比疗效安全可靠。
[本文引用:1]
[40] 陈宁,傅伟达,曲娟.参松养心胶囊治疗慢性主观性头晕疗效评价[J].浙江临床医学杂志,2015,17(8):1353-1354.
目的:为了进一步寻求更好的治疗慢性主观性头晕(CSD)药物、缓解患者的临床症状,分析和探讨在常规治疗的基础上加用参松养心胶囊的必要性和安全性以及临床症状量表评分。方法将2013年1月至2015年1月80例CSD患者随机分为对照组和观察组,每组各40例,对照组给予常规治疗(抗抑郁、抗焦虑、营养神经等),观察组除给予常规治疗外同时给予参松养心胶囊治疗,治疗周期为2个月,观察两组患者的治疗效果和临床症状量表评分改善情况。结果观察组总有效32例(80.00%)与对照组总有效20例(50.00%)比较总有效率明显提高,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论对于CSD患者在给予常规药物治疗的基础上联合应用参松养心胶囊治疗,不仅增加患者的临床治疗效果,而且有利于患者的康复,值得推荐。
URL    
[本文引用:1]
资源
PDF下载数    
RichHTML 浏览数    
摘要点击数    

分享
导出

相关文章:
关键词(key words)
头晕,主观性,慢性
发病机制
治疗


作者
袁天懿
曹效平
查曹兵