中国科技论文统计源期刊 中文核心期刊  
美国《化学文摘》《国际药学文摘》
《乌利希期刊指南》
WHO《西太平洋地区医学索引》来源期刊  
日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)
第七届湖北十大名刊提名奖  
医药导报, 2021, 40(2): 219-224
doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1004-0781.2021.02.013
胰岛素致外源性胰岛素抗体综合征患者的临床特点*
Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Exogenous Insulin-induced Antibody Syndrome
程运杰1,, 王晓丽2,, 张培培1, 常向云3

摘要:

目的 探讨胰岛素导致外源性胰岛素抗体综合征(EIAS)患者的临床特点及随访24周临床转归情况。方法 纳入2015年1月—2018年6月诊断的使用胰岛素治疗后出现EIAS的患者16例。经调整药物治疗后于第12周、24周随访,观察空腹血糖(FBG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、空腹胰岛素(FINS)、餐后2 h胰岛素(2hINS)、胰岛素抗体(IA)等变化的情况。结果 16例EIAS患者FINS及2hINS均明显升高,存在胰岛素、C肽分离现象,IA均为阳性。经停用胰岛素或更换胰岛素剂型后12周,所有患者FINS、2hINS均明显下降,2例患者胰岛素水平恢复至正常范围;第24周,12例患者胰岛素水平恢复至正常范围,9例患者IA转为阴性,无低血糖发生。结论 使用外源性胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者出现低血糖、血糖波动大、难以控制时,应检测胰岛素水平和IA,避免EIAS的漏诊或误诊;多数EIAS患者在停用胰岛素或更换剂型24周内胰岛素水平可明显下降,而IA转阴时间相对滞后。

关键词: 外源性胰岛素抗体综合征 ; 胰岛素抗体 ; 高胰岛素血症 ; C肽

Abstract:

Objective To explore the clinical characteristics of patients with exogenous insulin-induced antibody syndrome (EIAS) and the clinical outcome after 24 weeks follow-up. Methods A total of 16 cases with EIAS after insulin therapy from January 2015 to June 2018 were enrolled.Laboratory data such as general clinical data,fasting blood glucose (FBG),glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c),fasting insulin (FINS),2-hour insulin (2hINS),and insulin antibody (IA) were observed at 12 and 24 weeks after the adjustment of drug treatment. Results Serum FINS and 2hINS levels of 16 EIAS patients were significantly increased,and the separation of insulin and C-peptide was observed,and insulin antibodies of these cases were positive.Twelve weeks after the withdrawal of insulin or change of insulin dosage form,FINS and 2hINS levels decreased significantly (in all cases) or returned to normal (in 2 cases).At the 24th week,insulin levels of 12 patients became to the normal range,and 9 patients had negative IA,and no hypoglycemia occurred in all patients. Conclusion When diabetic patients treated with exogenous insulin,the insulin level and insulin antibody should be detected to avoid missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis of EIAs when hypoglycemia,large fluctuation of blood glucose and,difficulty in glucose control occur.In most patients with EIAS,insulin level can significantly decrease within 24 weeks after insulin withdrawal or dosage change,while the time for IA to turn negative is relatively lag.

Key words: Exogenous insulin antibody syndrome ; Insulin antibody ; Hyperinsulinemia ; C peptide

开放科学(资源服务)标识码(OSID)

自从19世纪20年代胰岛素上市以来,糖尿病的治疗发生历史性变革,胰岛素拯救无数人的生命。然而,很快发现外源性动物胰岛素的应用可诱发机体产生胰岛素抗体(insulin antibodies,IA),导致超敏反应、胰岛素抵抗及低血糖[1]。后来,又发现重组人胰岛素、胰岛素类似物亦可以诱导机体产生IA,其程度低于动物胰岛素,这种现象被称之为外源性胰岛素抗体综合征(exogenous insulin antibody syndrome,EIAS)[2]。EIAS的特点为应用外源性胰岛素后出现高滴度的血清IA,高水平的血清胰岛素且与C肽水平不平行,严重的胰岛素抵抗,较大的血糖波动,餐后高血糖、夜间或早晨低血糖,严重者致昏迷等[3]。EIAS引起低血糖在临床上往往被误诊或漏诊,目前国内外报道较少。近年来,随着糖尿病患病率上升,胰岛素应用增加,EIAS的发病有增加趋势。笔者在本研究拟探讨EIAS患者临床特点及随访24周临床转归情况,复习相关文献,提高临床医师对本疾病的认识和诊治能力。

1 资料与方法
1.1 资料来源

2015年1月—2018年6月于石河子大学医学院第一附属医院内分泌科临床确诊的注射胰岛素后导致EIAS的糖尿病患者,共收集病例16例,排除标准:感染急性期,严重肝、肾疾病,恶性肿瘤,自身免疫性疾病,服用含巯基药物史,服用免疫抑制药,妊娠或哺乳期妇女。

1.2 方法

收集患者一般临床资料包括性别、年龄、体质量指数(BMI)、糖尿病病程、胰岛素使用时间、胰岛素使用种类、注射次数、低血糖发生情况。实验室检查包括:肝功能、肾功能、血常规、甲状腺功能、肿瘤标志物等。所有患者行100 g馒头餐试验,检测空腹血糖(FBG)、餐后2 h血糖(2hBG)、空腹胰岛素(FINS)、空腹C肽(FCP)、2 h胰岛素(2hINS)、2 hC肽(2hCP)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)等;检测糖尿病相关抗体,包括IA、胰岛细胞抗体(islet cell antibody,ICA)、谷氨酸脱羧酶抗体(glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody,GADA)、蛋白络氨酸磷酸酶抗体(IA-2A)。完善腹部B超或CT检查,除外胰腺肿瘤。经调整治疗方案,于第12,24周随访,再次行100 g馒头餐试验,检测FBG、2hBG、FINS、2hINS、HbA1c水平,于第24周复查IA,记录低血糖发生情况及药物治疗情况。胰岛素自身抗体检测采用免疫印迹法(定性检查,正常为阴性);血清胰岛素及C肽测定采用化学发光法(正常参考范围为FINS 17.8~173 pmol·L-1,FCP 0.26~0.6 nmol·L-1);HbA1c采用高效液相色谱法(我院正常参考范围为<6.5%)。所有患者均完善胰腺B超或CT检查,排除胰腺肿瘤。

1.3 仪器

全自动化学发光免疫分析仪(德国罗氏公司);全自动蛋白印迹仪(深圳亚辉龙公司);全自动糖化血红蛋白分析仪(日本爱科来公司);全自动生化分析仪(美国贝克曼公司);全自动模块式血液体液分析仪(日本希森美康公司)。

2 结果
2.1 基本临床资料

16例患者中,男10例,女6例,男:女=5:3,年龄37~79岁,糖尿病病程5~22年,BMI19.3~29.4 kg·(m2)-1,超重/肥胖者[BMI ≥24 kg·(m2)-1]9例。肝、肾功能方面,除病例10的丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)轻度升高(考虑脂肪肝所致),其他患者ALT、AST均正常。所有患者血肌酐(creatinine,Cr)均在正常范围,肾小球滤过率(glomerular filtration rate,eGFR)在50.2~121.2 mL·min-1·(173 m2)-1。见表1。

表1 患者一般临床资料
Tab.1 Baseline data of the patients
患者
序号
性别 年龄/
糖尿病病程/
BMI/
[kg·(m2)-1]
ALT AST Cr/
(μmol·L-1)
cGFR/
(mL·min-1)
(U·L-1)
1 72 22 25.1 20 18 90.4 72.7
2 61 13 25.7 28 19 66.2 99.1
3 73 9 28.7 20 23 82.4 80.9
4 79 7 23.4 16 16 88.9 70.8
5 57 11 23.1 30 29 88.6 83.0
6 61 10 19.5 8 14 99.5 70.1
7 72 9 27.1 18 19 70.9 73.7
8 72 7 23.2 15 21 51.6 92.2
9 63 12 24.1 26 20 98.8 52.5
10 51 6 29.4 117 79 52.5 116.9
11 67 13 23.1 21 21 62.8 77.5
12 54 15 26.8 9 11 93.5 79.4
13 71 18 19.3 10 14 101.8 63.6
14 54 8 27.1 20 21 54.9 102.5
15 73 18 21.1 14 16 96.8 50.2
16 37 5 26.6 23 12 47.4 121.2

表1 患者一般临床资料

Tab.1 Baseline data of the patients

2.2 胰岛素使用、低血糖情况及自身抗体检测结果

16例患者中使用门冬胰岛素30者6例,使用精蛋白锌重组人胰岛素30/70者4例,使用鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH)者3例,使用精蛋白锌重组赖脯胰岛素25R 者2例,使用门冬胰岛素50者1例。使用胰岛素时间1~13年,胰岛素剂量16~52 U·d-1,注射次数每天1~3次,低血糖发生时间:空腹5例,早餐后2例,午餐前4例,晚餐前3例,夜间6例,晚餐后3例,IA均为阳性,GADA、ICA、IA-2A均为阴性。见表2。

表2 16例患者胰岛素使用、低血糖情况及自身抗体检测结果
Tab.2 Results of insulin usage,hypoglycemia and autoantibody detection in 16 patients
患者
序号
胰岛素剂型 使用胰岛素
时间/年
胰岛素剂量/
(U·d-1)
注射次数/
(次·d-1)
低血糖
发作时间
IA GADA ICA IA-2A
1 门冬胰岛素30 7.5 30 2 午餐前、晚餐前 + - - -
2 门冬胰岛素30 2.0 38 3 + - - -
3 精蛋白锌重组人胰岛素30/70 5.0 42 2 晚餐前,空腹 + - - -
4 鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素 7.0 34 2 夜间 + - - -
5 精蛋白锌重组赖铺胰岛素25R 2.0 36 3 晚餐后,空腹 + - - -
6 精蛋白锌重组人胰岛30/70 5.0 40 2 晚餐前、夜间 + - - -
7 门冬胰岛素30 4.0 52 3 空腹、午餐前、晚餐后 + - - -
8 精蛋白锌重组人胰岛30/70 7.0 24 2 早餐后、晚餐后,夜间 + - - -
9 鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素 6.0 40 2 空腹 + - - -
10 门冬胰岛素30 1.5 32 2 + - - -
11 门冬胰岛素50 2.5 28 2 空腹、午餐前 + - - -
12 精蛋白锌重组赖铺胰岛素25R 5.0 46 3 空腹、午餐前、夜间 + - - -
13 精蛋白锌重组人胰岛素30/70 13.0 42 2 午餐前 + - - -
14 门冬胰岛素30 4.0 18 2 早餐后 + - - -
15 门冬胰岛素30 8.0 46 2 夜间 + - - -
16 鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素 1.0 16 1 夜间 + - - -

“+”:阳性;“-”:阴性。

“+”:positive;“-”:negative.

表2 16例患者胰岛素使用、低血糖情况及自身抗体检测结果

Tab.2 Results of insulin usage,hypoglycemia and autoantibody detection in 16 patients

2.3 实验室检查及药物治疗调整情况

16例患者HbA1c为6.2%~13.2%,所有患者行100 g馒头餐试验,结果显示:FINS及2hINS均明显升高,存在胰岛素、C肽分离现象。住院期间给予调整治疗方案,所有患者均停用原胰岛素,改为口服药物或更换胰岛素剂型,其中单用二甲双胍1例,单用糖苷酶抑制剂2例,二甲双胍联合糖苷酶抑制剂 6例,噻唑烷二酮联合糖苷酶抑制剂1例,使用GLP-1受体激动剂 2例,使用长效胰岛素类似物联合口服药物治疗4例。见表3。教育患者少量多餐,鼓励进食燕麦、谷物、荞麦、大麦等没有加工的谷物。鼓励温和的有氧运动,如餐后散步,避免空腹剧烈的运动等。

表3 实验室检查及药物调整情况
Tab.3 Laboralory examination and medication adjustment
患者
序号
FBG 2hBG HbA1C/
%
FINS 2hINS FCP 2hCP 治疗方案
调整
(nmol·L-1) (pmol·L-1) (nmol·L-1)
1 8.20 19.70 7.9 5 411.8 5 864.7 0.08 0.16 甘精胰岛素16 U,qd;二甲双胍0.5 g,tid
2 9.40 16.00 9.5 650.9 908.2 0.18 0.66 二甲双胍0.5 g,tid;阿卡波糖100 mg,tid
3 12.60 19.80 8.1 669.9 999.0 0.58 1.57 二甲双胍0.5 g,tid
4 6.50 18.80 9.3 231.9 584.0 0.40 1.07 阿卡波糖100 mg,tid
5 7.40 22.00 11.4 6 965.0 >6 950.0 0.49 2.09 二甲双胍1.0 g,bid;伏格列波糖0.2 mg,tid
6 3.20 13.30 6.2 1 470.8 2 757.8 0.18 0.27 地特胰岛素10 U,qd;阿卡波糖50 mg,tid
7 9.30 16.20 6.8 3 199.5 5 000.3 0.60 1.76 二甲双胍0.5 g,tid;阿卡波糖100 mg,tid
8 14.70 16.50 12.7 1 345.6 1 734.2 0.21 0.54 伏格列波糖0.2 mg,tid;二甲双胍0.5 g,tid
9 11.50 17.20 8.3 2 794.4 4 734.8 0.89 2.14 地特胰岛素12 U,qd;二甲双胍1.0 g,bid
10 8.90 20.30 10.5 3 395.0 >6 950.0 0.97 2.88 利拉鲁肽1.2 mg,qd;二甲双胍0.5 g,tid
11 8.60 16.20 7.2 2 265.0 2 353.0 0.54 0.64 阿卡波糖100 mg,tid
12 7.60 18.60 7.9 1 881.0 6 082.5 0.28 0.84 利拉鲁肽1.2 mg,qd;阿卡波糖50 mg,tid
13 11.00 19.30 10.3 5 448.0 5 937.7 0.18 0.19 地特胰岛素18 U,qd;伏格列波糖0.2 mg,tid
14 7.10 19.20 11.6 2 244.8 5 009.3 0.59 1.61 二甲双胍1.0 g,bid;阿卡波糖100 mg,tid
15 6.10 16.10 9.4 1 248.1 1 184.1 0.23 0.46 二甲双胍0.5 g,tid;阿卡波糖100 mg,tid
16 3.10 15.70 13.2 1 832.2 4 322.2 0.29 0.61 罗格列酮4 mg,qd;阿卡波糖100 mg,tid

表3 实验室检查及药物调整情况

Tab.3 Laboralory examination and medication adjustment

2.4 随访资料

16例患者均于调整治疗后12,24周进行门诊随访,再次行100 g馒头餐试验。第12周随访,1例(例5)失访,其余病例FINS、2hINS均明显下降,2例(例2,8)FINS、2hINS恢复正常;5例(例1,7,9,10,11)患者报告偶尔有低血糖症状发作,发作频率少于每周1次,主要为夜间及空腹出现,进食后症状可缓解,无严重低血糖发生。第24周随访,失访2例(例3,10),病例11拒绝行馒头餐试验;部分患者FBG、2hBG、HbA1c有升高趋势;12例患者FINS恢复至正常范围,1例FINS仍偏高;复查IA,4例阳性,9例阴性,无低血糖发生。见表4。

表4 16例患者治疗后第12周、第24周随访资料
Tab.4 Follow-up data of 16 patients in the 12th or 24th week after treatment
患者
序号
FBG/
(nmol·L-1)
2hBG/
(nmol·L-1)
HbA1c/
%
FINS/
(pmol·L-1)
2hINS/
(pmol·L-1)
低血糖 IA
12周 24周 12周 24周 12周 24周 12周 24周 12周 24周 12周 24周
1 7.1 7.7 14.6 15.1 7.2 7.7 542.6 46.2 670.5 88.7 阳性
2 8.0 8.2 16.7 15.3 8.3 8.0 42.9 37.6 93.7 129.4 阴性
3 9.4 15.5 7.8 396.1 406.0
4 8.8 9.6 14.2 15.1 8.4 8.9 179.9 101.2 484.2 279.4 阴性
5
6 10.1 11.2 12.9 16.7 8.1 8.8 193.1 37.5 437.4 79.4 阴性
7 11.8 7.6 14.5 13.6 8.3 7.4 306.3 44.6 685.5 142.1 阳性
8 9.9 9.4 13.3 14.2 9.5 9.0 34.8 36.1 73.4 77.6 阴性
9 7.5 7.0 18.8 17.1 8.5 8.0 1 849.2 221.4 2 950.4 399.5 阳性
10 8.9 16.5 8.8 1 087.9 1 365.0
11 9.9 10.3 8.1 8.4 1 144.1 46.2 阴性
12 10.9 7.4 14.8 13.9 7.8 6.9 270.0 65.7 429.2 191.6 阳性
13 8.6 7.7 17.2 16.8 9.0 8.7 1 350.5 102.4 1 653.2 112.7 阴性
14 8.8 8.3 15.2 17.4 8.2 8.6 1 235.3 72.9 1 223.8 250.1 阴性
15 11.4 11.7 20.9 16.6 8.7 8.2 597.1 67.6 631.9 117.2 阴性
16 5.8 6.0 9.6 8.4 10.6 7.1 892.9 49.7 904.5 142.3 阴性

表4 16例患者治疗后第12周、第24周随访资料

Tab.4 Follow-up data of 16 patients in the 12th or 24th week after treatment

3 讨论

EIAS是指有外源性胰岛素使用史,无巯基药物应用史,无活动性自身免疫性疾病,排除胰岛素瘤、B型胰岛素抵抗和其他原因的低血糖,出现反复发作的自发性低血糖症,高浓度免疫活性的胰岛素与C肽浓度分离,针对外源性胰岛素产生IA的综合征[4]。临床上,使用胰岛素的糖尿病患者出现低血糖,往往会被认为是胰岛素剂量过大或进食减少,EIAS常被忽视。然而,EIAS并不少见。国外研究提示,在使用人胰岛素的糖尿病患者中IA的产生率高达80%[5]。我国目前没有关于EIAS的大样本数据,仅有少数个案报道。本研究收集16例EIAS患者,并进行为期24周的随访,报道例数相对较多。

因EIAS与胰岛素自身免疫综合征(insulin autoimmune syndrome,IAS)均可表现为低血糖和IA阳性,临床上容易将两者混淆。两者主要鉴别点,①诱因不同:EIAS为糖尿病患者使用外源性胰岛素后诱导产生IA;IAS患者可以是糖尿病或非糖尿病患者,大多由服用含巯基的药物诱发,如甲巯咪唑、硫普罗宁、青霉胺、异烟肼、普鲁卡因胺等,而无胰岛素使用史,常伴有其他自身免疫性疾病,如Graves病、类风湿关节炎、多发性硬化症、系统性红斑狼疮、黑棘皮病等[6,7];②IA的特点不同:EIAS患者体内IA是外源性胰岛素诱导产生的,其特点为低胰岛素结合容量和相对高的胰岛素亲和力,对血糖的影响相对不大,可表现为低血糖,也可表现为高血糖;IAS的IA是针对内源性胰岛素产生,具有高结合容量低亲和力的特点,临床上常导致极严重的自发性低血糖,甚至昏迷[8]。现有检测手段不能区分外源性胰岛素抗体和内源性胰岛素抗体,只能依据病史来判断。本研究中,16例患者均有胰岛素使用史,无含巯基类药物使用史,无自身免疫性疾病,因此符合EIAS诊断。笔者发现,EIAS患者间的异质性较强,低血糖的发生与胰岛素水平的高低无明显关系。本研究中,仅1例患者表现为低血糖昏迷,13例为轻度低血糖,2例患者病程中无低血糖发生而表现为高血糖,分析可能原因是IA为多克隆抗体,不同个体间产生的IA有较大差异,胰岛素与抗体的结合部位不同,这使得胰岛素的生物学效应在不同个体间产生很大差异。笔者分析,胰岛素与抗体的不适当大量解离可造成低血糖,解离的程度不同,造成低血糖的严重程度不同;而胰岛素与抗体结合后的缓慢、延迟解离造成游离胰岛素量过少,可导致高血糖。本研究中EIAS患者低血糖多发生在夜间或空腹,引起此现象的原因可能是由于夜间血液酸度升高,增加IA的解离,另一方面夜间无食物摄入也可能是引起低血糖的原因[9,10]

以往人们认为,动物胰岛素与人胰岛素的氨基酸序列不同,会增加其免疫源性。但是近年来文献报道[6,11],重组人胰岛素、胰岛素类似物均可产生IA,诱发EIAS。本研究中,16例患者使用的胰岛素主要为重组人胰岛素和胰岛素类似物,包括:精蛋白锌重组人胰岛素30/70、鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素、精蛋白锌重组赖脯胰岛素25R、门冬胰岛素30、门冬胰岛素50,本研究中未发现注射长效胰岛素类似物(如甘精胰岛素、地特胰岛素)产生IA的病例。研究报道[12],胰岛素类似物的免疫原性大于重组人胰岛素,可能是胰岛素类似物与人胰岛素的氨基酸序列及修饰集团不同导致的。也有研究报道[13],皮下注射胰岛素类似物产生的IA与人胰岛素诱导的IA并无显著差别。外源性胰岛素还可产生多种免疫反应,如脆性糖尿病、胰岛素过敏及IAS[9,14],而胰岛素注射部位的脂肪萎缩可能与局部免疫复合物的沉积有关[15]

EIAS具有自限性,预后良好,治疗方法主要是更换胰岛素剂型或停用胰岛素,改为口服药物降糖,极个别患者需要使用糖皮质激素或血浆置换治疗。多数患者停用胰岛素后,随着自身抗体逐渐清除,低血糖发作会随着抗体滴度和血清胰岛素水平降低而缓解[16]。本研究中16例患者停用胰岛素或更改剂型,饮食以碳水化合物为主,少量多餐,给予二甲双胍、α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂、噻唑烷二酮类等药物控制血糖,24周内低血糖症状逐渐改善,均未使用糖皮质激素或血浆置换治疗,大多数患者血清胰岛素水平下降至正常范围。有研究报道,EIAS患者的胰岛素抗体在胰岛素停用6~17个月消失[17,18]。本研究中,完成随访13例患者,9例IA在24周转阴。考虑抗体消失时间与最初抗体滴度和不同个体对胰岛素及抗体的清除率不同有关。

本研究中部分患者在停用原胰岛素改为口服药物治疗后,血糖有升高趋势,这些患者在IA转阴后仍需要再次启用不同剂型的胰岛素控制血糖。例如病例13,糖尿病病程较长,空腹及餐后C肽低平,考虑目前长效胰岛素类似物诱导EIAS的报道较少,故停用原胰岛素后给予地特胰岛素联合α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂治疗,第12周随访发现胰岛素水平仍较高,血糖控制不佳,尤其餐后血糖升高明显,因担心加用餐时短效胰岛素可能加重EIAS的高胰岛素血症,故医嘱加强生活方式干预,第24周胰岛素水平下降、IA转阴后,给予加用餐时短效胰岛素,最终血糖控制情况改善。对于这类病程长、自身胰岛功能差的EIAS患者,如果血糖长期得不到控制,可能诱发酮血症,或许可以尝试更早地积极启用“三短一长”胰岛素替代方案进行治疗,并密切监测血清胰岛素变化。

综上所述,随着糖尿病患者病程的进展,胰岛功能减退,胰岛素成为控制血糖的最有力“武器”。在使用胰岛素的过程中,患者可能出现低血糖、血糖大幅度波动情况,临床医师应考虑监测胰岛素、C肽、胰岛素抗体等,筛选出EIAS,及时停用胰岛素或更换剂型。多数EIAS患者在停用原胰岛素后24周内胰岛素水平恢复至正常范围,而IA转阴的时间相对滞后。

参考文献

[1] BERSON S A,YALOW R S,BAUMAN A,et al.Insulin-I131 metabolism in human subjects:demonstration of insulin binding globulin in the circulation of insulin treated subjects[J].J Clin Invest,1956,35(2):170-190.
DOI:10.1172/JCI103262      PMID:13286336      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[2] 周方励,田浩明.糖尿病患者外源性胰岛素诱导胰岛素抗体产生的临床意义[J].实用医院临床杂志,2014,11(1):18-21.
[本文引用:1]
[3] 肖靖,李梅欣,郑欣.外源性胰岛素抗体综合征三例报道[J].中国糖尿病杂志,2015,23(6):512-515.
[本文引用:1]
[4] 朱凌云,张化冰,朱余蓉,.外源性胰岛素自身免疫综合征六例诊治分析并文献复习[J].中国糖尿病杂志,2018,26(4):338-342.
[本文引用:1]
[5] RADERMECKER R P,RENARD E,SCHEEN A J.Circula-ting insulin antibodies:influence of continuous subcutaneous or intraperitoneal insulin infusion,and impact on glucose control[J].Diabetes Metab Res Rev,2009,25(6):491-50l.
The purification of animal insulin preparations and the use of human recombinant insulin have markedly reduced the incidence, but not completely suppressed, the development of anti-insulin antibodies (IAs). Advances in technologies concerning the mode of delivery of insulin, i.e. continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), continuous peritoneal insulin infusion (CPII) and more recently inhaled insulin administration, appear to significantly increase circulating levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-IAs in diabetic patients. However, the increase is usually moderate and mostly transient as compared to previous observations with poorly purified animal insulin preparations. The clinical impact of these circulating anti-IAs remains unclear. Nevertheless, several studies have suggested that antibodies could retard insulin action, leading to a worsening of postprandial hyperglycaemia and/or serve as a carrier, thus leading to unexpected hypoglycaemia. CPII may be associated with more marked and sustained increase in IAs levels, possibly related to the use of an unstable insulin and the formation of immunogenic aggregates of insulin. The possible clinical consequences of these high levels of IAs remain to be evaluated because a low-glucose morning syndrome or severe insulin resistance with ketone bodies production have been reported in some cases. In conclusion, even if CSII and CPII may promote the development of circulating IAs, this increase does not lead to immunological insulin resistance, compared to that previously described with animal non-purified insulin preparations, and seems to have only marginal influence on blood glucose control or complications in most diabetic patients.
DOI:10.1002/dmrr.961      PMID:19496088      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[6] SU C T,LIN Y C.Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia associa-ted with insulin antibodies caused by exogenous insulin analog[J].Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep,2016.DOI:10.1530/EDM-16-0079.
Summary: Insulinomatosis is a rare cause of hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia. The ideal management approach is not known. A 40-year-old woman with recurrent symptomatic hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia was diagnosed with an insulinoma. A benign 12 mm pancreatic head insulinoma was resected but hypoglycaemia recurred 7 years later. A benign 10 mm pancreatic head insulinoma was then resected but hypoglycaemia recurred within 2 months. Octreotide injections were trialled but exacerbated hypoglycaemia. After a 2-year interval, she underwent total pancreatectomy. A benign 28 mm pancreatic head insulinoma was found alongside insulin-expressing monohormonal endocrine cell clusters (IMECCs) and islet cell hyperplasia, consistent with a diagnosis of insulinomatosis. Hypoglycaemia recurred within 6 weeks. There was no identifiable lesion on MRI pancreas, Ga-68 PET or FDG PET. Diazoxide and everolimus were not tolerated. MEN-1 testing was negative. Insulinomatosis should be suspected in insulinomas with early recurrence or multifocality. De novo lesions can arise throughout the pancreas. Extensive surgery will assist diagnosis but may not provide cure. Learning points: Insulinomas are usually benign and managed surgically. Insulinomatosis is characterised by multifocal benign insulinomas with a tendency to recur early. It is rare. Multifocal or recurrent insulinomas should raise suspicion of MEN-1 syndrome, or insulinomatosis. Insulinomatosis is distinguished histologically by insulin-expressing monohormonal endocrine cell clusters (IMECCs) and tumour staining only for insulin, whereas MEN-1 associated insulinomas stain for multiple hormones. The ideal treatment strategy is unknown. Total pancreatectomy may not offer cure.
DOI:10.1530/EDM-20-0091      PMID:33434149      URL    
[本文引用:2]
[7] 王梦雷,余舒乐,宋昌龙,.抗甲状腺功能亢进症药物致胰岛素自身免疫综合征流行病学分析[J].医药导报,2019,38(7):958-960.
[本文引用:1]
[8] WONG S L,PRIESTAN A,HOLMES D T.Recurrent hypo-glycemia from insulin autoimmune syndrome[J].J Gen Intern Med,2014,29(1):250-254.
Insulin autoimmune syndrome (IAS) is an uncommon cause of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia characterized by autoantibodies to endogenous insulin in individuals without previous exposure to exogenous insulin. IAS is the third leading cause of spontaneous hypoglycemia in Japan, and is increasingly being recognized worldwide in non-Asian populations. We report a case of IAS in a Caucasian woman with recurrent complaints of hypoglycemia, with laboratory findings of serum glucose 2.5 mmol/L (45 mg/dL), insulin 54,930 pmol/L (7,909 mu IU/mL), connecting peptide (C-peptide) 4,104 pmol/L (12.4 ng/mL), and a corresponding insulin to C-peptide molar ratio of 13.4 during a spontaneous hypoglycemic event. Autoantibodies to insulin were markedly elevated at > 50 kU/L (> 50 U/mL). IAS should be considered in the differential diagnosis of hypoglycemia in non-diabetic individuals. Distinction from insulinoma is especially crucial to prevent unwarranted invasive procedures and surgical interventions in hypoglycemic patients.
DOI:10.1007/s11606-013-2588-9      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[9] KEIZO K,CHIHIRO S,TOMOHITO,et al.Enhancement of postprandial endogenous insulin secretion rather than exogenous insulin injection ameliorated insulin antibody-induced unstable diabetes:a case report[J].BMC Endocr Disord,2019,19(1):5.
PMID:30621663      URL    
[本文引用:2]
[10] ZHAO T Y,LI F,XIONG Z Y.Frequent reoccurrence of hypoglycemia in a type 2 diabetic patient with insulin antibodies[J].Mol Diagn Ther,2010,14(4):237-241.
BACKGROUND: Insulin antibody (IAb) may be produced in patients receiving long-term, animal-derived insulin, leading to insulin resistance or hypoglycemia. There have been very few reports of hypoglycemia caused by IAb in patients taking recombinant human insulin. CASE REPORT: We report the case of an 82-year-old male patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus who suffered repeated episodes of severe hypoglycemia-related symptoms (including coma) prior to admission. The patient had been taking Novolin 30R, a premixed human insulin. The patient's IAb level was markedly elevated, and hypoglycemia caused by recombinant human insulin treatment-induced IAb production was diagnosed. Acarbose and metformin were prescribed, and the patient recovered uneventfully. The patient ceased taking these medications, and he was subsequently treated with recombinant human insulin to combat hyperglycemia. This was followed by reoccurrence of hypoglycemic coma. The patient was advised to avoid taking recombinant human insulin for the rest of his life and to control hyperglycemia with acarbose and metformin. CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, hypoglycemia caused by recombinant human insulin-induced IAb production should be considered in patients with type 2 diabetes who experience repeated episodes of hypoglycemia.
DOI:10.1007/BF03256379      PMID:20799766      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[11] SARERBORN M,BRINKS V,JISKOOT W,et al.Immu-noiogical mechanism underlying the immune response to recombinant human protein therapeutics[J].Trends Pharmacol Sci,20l0,3l(2):53-59.
[本文引用:1]
[12] ISHIZUKA T,OGAWA S,MORI T,et al.Characteristics of the antibodies of two patients who developed daytime hyperglycemia and morning hypoglycemia because of insulin antibodies[J].Diabetes Res Clin Pract,2009,84(2):e21-23.
We encountered two patients who developed daytime hyperglycemia and early morning hypoglycemia because of insulin antibody (IA) that the affinity was extremely lower and the capacity extremely higher than those of IA in the insulin autoimmune syndrome, after their insulin treatment were changed from human insulin to analog insulin.
DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2009.02.007      PMID:19328577      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[13] FINEBERG S E,HUANG J,BRUNELLE R,et al.Effect of long-term exposure to insulin lispro on the induction of antibody response in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes[J].Diabetes Care,2003,26(1):89-96.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term effects of insulin lispro on inducing lispro-specific, insulin-specific, and cross-reactive (reactive with both insulin lispro and human insulin) antibodies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A multinational, multicenter combination of controlled and noncontrolled, open-label studies of 4.5 years' duration was designed to evaluate the long-term immunologic profile of subcutaneously administered insulin lispro. A total of 1,221 patients (men and women; 12-81 years of age) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were enrolled. Circulating anti-insulin antibodies were measured using radioimmunoassays. RESULTS: Insulin-specific and lispro-specific antibody responses were within the background noise levels of the assays. Significant elevations of antibody were confined to a cross-reactive antibody response. Antibody levels resulting from prior exposure to long- and short-acting insulins changed little after transfer to insulin lispro and remained within or near the baseline levels. De novo exposure to insulin lispro resulted in increases in cross-reactive but not insulin- or lispro-specific antibody levels. Cross-reactive insulin antibodies developed more readily in patients with type 1 diabetes than in those with type 2 diabetes. Long-term antibody responses tended to decrease over time and returned to baseline or near-baseline levels by the end of the long-term studies. No evidence of an anamnestic antibody response could be found in individuals treated intermittently with insulin lispro. CONCLUSIONS: The immunogenic profile of patients treated with insulin lispro was comparable to that of patients treated with recombinant human insulin. Inductions of significant levels of specific or cross-reactive antibodies were not observed in patients who had received insulin previously. No significant antibody-dependent increases in insulin dosage requirements were noted in these patients. The incidence of insulin allergy was not different from that in patients treated with recombinant regular human insulin.
DOI:10.2337/diacare.26.1.89      PMID:12502663      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[14] JASSAM N,AMIN N,HOLLAND P,et al.Analytical and clinical challenges in a patient with concurrent type 1 diabetes,subcutaneous insulin resistance and insulin autoimmune syndrome[J].Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep,2014,2014:130086.
UNLABELLED: A 48-year-old hypertensive and diabetic patient presented with a 10-year history of progressive right facial pain, tinnitus, hearing loss, sweating, and palpitations. Investigations revealed a 5.6 cm vascular tumor at the carotid bifurcation. Her blood pressure (BP) was 170/110, on lisinopril 20 mg od and amlodipine 10 mg od and 100 U of insulin daily. A catecholamine-secreting carotid body paraganglioma (CSCBP) was suspected; the diagnosis was confirmed biochemically by determining plasma norepinephrine (NE) level, 89 000 pmol/l, and chromogranin A (CgA) level, 279 mug/l. Meta-iodobenzylguanidine and octreotide scanning confirmed a single tumor in the neck. A week after giving the patient a trial of octreotide 100 mug 8 h, the NE level dropped progressively from 50 000 to 25 000 pmol/l and CgA from 279 to 25 mug/l. Treatment was therefore continued with labetalol 200 mg twice daily (bid) and long-acting octreotide-LA initially using 40 mg/month and later increasing to 80 mg/month. On this dose and with a reduced labetalol intake of 100 mg bid, BP was maintained at 130/70 and her symptoms resolved completely. CgA levels returned to normal in the first week and these were maintained throughout the 3 month treatment period. During tumor resection, there were minimal BP fluctuations during the 10 h procedure. We conclude that short-term high-dose octreotide-LA might prove valuable in the preoperative management of catecholamine-secreting tumors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the successful use of octreotide in a CSCBP. LEARNING POINTS: The value of octreotide scanning in the localization of extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma.Control of catecholamine secretion using high-dose octreotide.This is a report of a rare cause of secondary diabetes and hypertension.
DOI:10.1530/EDM-14-0051      PMID:25136449      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[15] TRABUCCHI A,IACONO R F,GUERRA L L,et al.Characterization of insulin antibodies by surface plasmon resonance in two clinical cases:brittle diabetes and insulin autoimmune syndrome[J].PLoS One,2013,8(12):e84099.
Syndecan-1 (CD138), a heparan sulfate proteoglycan, acts as a coreceptor for growth factors and chemokines and is a molecular marker associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition during development and carcinogenesis. Resistance of Syndecan-1-deficient mice to experimentally-induced tumorigenesis has been linked to altered Wnt-responsive precursor cell pools, suggesting a potential role of Syndecan-1 in breast cancer cell stem function. However, the precise molecular mechanism is still elusive. Here, we decipher the functional impact of Syndecan-1 knockdown using RNA interference on the breast cancer stem cell phenotype of human triple-negative MDA-MB-231 and hormone receptor-positive MCF-7 cells in vitro employing an analytical flow cytometric approach. Successful Syndecan-1 siRNA knockdown was confirmed by flow cytometry. Side population measurement by Hoechst dye exclusion and Aldehyde dehydrogenase-1 activity revealed that Syndecan-1 knockdown in MDA-MB-231 cells significantly reduced putative cancer stem cell pools by 60% and 27%, respectively, compared to controls. In MCF-7 cells, Syndecan-1 depletion reduced the side population by 40% and Aldehyde dehydrogenase-1 by 50%, repectively. In MDA-MB-231 cells, the CD44(+)CD24(-/low) phenotype decreased significantly by 6% upon siRNA-mediated Syndecan-1 depletion. Intriguingly, IL-6, its receptor sIL-6R, and the chemokine CCL20, implicated in regulating stemness-associated pathways, were downregulated by >40% in Syndecan-1-silenced MDA-MB-231 cells, which showed a dysregulated response to IL-6-induced shifts in E-cadherin and vimentin expression. Furthermore, activation of STAT-3 and NFkB transcription factors and expression of a coreceptor for Wnt signaling, LRP-6, were reduced by >45% in Syndecan-1-depleted cells compared to controls. At the functional level, Syndecan-1 siRNA reduced the formation of spheres and cysts in MCF-7 cells grown in suspension culture. Our study demonstrates the viability of flow cytometric approaches in analyzing cancer stem cell function. As Syndecan-1 modulates the cancer stem cell phenotype via regulation of the Wnt and IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathways, it emerges as a promising novel target for therapeutic approaches.
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0085737      PMID:24392029      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[16] QUAN H,TAN H,LI Q,et al.Immunological hypoglycemia associated with insulin antibodies induced by exogenous insulin in 11 Chinese patients with diabetes[J].J Diabetes Res,2015,2015:746271.
DOI:10.1155/2015/780903      PMID:26457308      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[17] IONESCU-TIRGOVISTE C,MINCU I,SIMIONESCU L,et al.Disappearance rate of insulin antibodies after discountinuing insulin treatment in 42 type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients[J].Diabetologia,1984,27(6):592-595.
The disappearance rate of insulin antibodies was studied after cessation of insulin treatment which had been given for 3 months to 6 years in 42 Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. Insulin antibodies were measured before and 15 days after interruption of insulin treatment, and every 30 days until the disappearance of insulin antibodies. The mean +/- SD value of insulin binding in the entire group before the interruption of insulin treatment was 32 +/- 14%. There was no relationship between the antibody level at that time and the duration of insulin treatment. However, the insulin antibody level was significantly higher in 17 diabetic patients on an insulin dose of greater than 20 U/day (p less than 0.02) than in 25 on an insulin dose of less than 20 U/day (39 +/- 13% versus 28 +/- 12%). A positive correlation was found between initial insulin binding and the time required for it to fall below 10% (r = 0.74). Antibodies were absent 60 days after discontinuing insulin treatment in eight of ten subjects presenting with initial binding of less than 20%. In contrast, in only two of 12 patients with an initial binding of greater than 40% were insulin antibodies detectable 150 days after discontinuation of insulin therapy. Disappearance of insulin antibodies sometimes took up to 1 year and occasionally even more than 2 years.
DOI:10.1007/BF00276974      PMID:6397385      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[18] 徐太军.近15年文献报告的胰岛素自身免疫综合征71例荟萃分析[J].中国免疫学杂志,2016,32(7):1053-1055.
[本文引用:1]
资源
PDF下载数    
RichHTML 浏览数    
摘要点击数    

分享
导出

相关文章:
关键词(key words)
外源性胰岛素抗体综合征
胰岛素抗体
高胰岛素血症
C肽

Exogenous insulin antibod...
Insulin antibody
Hyperinsulinemia
C peptide

作者
程运杰
王晓丽
张培培
常向云

CHENG Yunjie
WANG Xiaoli
ZHANG Peipei
CHANG Xiangyun