中国科技论文统计源期刊 中文核心期刊  
美国《化学文摘》《国际药学文摘》
《乌利希期刊指南》
WHO《西太平洋地区医学索引》来源期刊  
日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)
第七届湖北十大名刊提名奖  
医药导报, 2017, 36(4): 366-369
doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1004-0781.2017.04.003
冠脉介入术中血栓风暴的诊断与救治
Diagnosis and Treatment of Thrombotic Storm During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
张欣欣, 许祥玉, 郭小梅

摘要:

冠心病介入术中患者的高凝状态、机械性扩张冠脉病变血管引起的斑块破裂、血小板激活和粘附等因素介导的血栓风暴,仍是造成术中心血管不良事件的主要原因之一。其危险性极高,如果处置不力,则死亡率极高。冠状动脉血管造影、心肌呈色分级等均可迅速诊断血栓风暴。冠状动脉血栓风暴发生即刻给予患者相应治疗,如血小板Ⅱb/Ⅲa受体拮抗药替罗非班或扩血管药等可迅速改善冠脉血流,能有效救治血栓风暴。

关键词: 替罗非班 ; 血栓风暴 ; 冠脉介入

Abstract:

During percutaneous coronary intervention, thrombotic storm which is mediated by hypercoagulable state, mechanical distension induced-plaque rupture, platelet activation and adhesion is still the main cause of cardiovascular adverse events. The mortality rate is extremely high if not treated properly. Thrombotic storm can be diagnosed quickly through coronary artery angiography and myocardial blush grades. Once coronary thrombosis occurs, medicine including platelet Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor antagonist tirofiban or vasodilators can rapidly improve coronary flow and effectively treat it.

Key words: Tirofiban ; Thrombotic Storm ; Percutaneous coronary intervention

目前经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)是治疗急性冠脉综合征最有效、最常用的方法[1]。而PCI围手术期是血栓事件的高发阶段,PCI术中可发生血栓风暴导致心肌梗死或死亡等严重后果,临床死亡率极高[2-3]。冠状动脉(简称:冠脉)血栓风暴即一支冠脉内迅速形成大量血栓,或多支血管同时发生血栓栓塞,多以白血栓、混合血栓为主,以球囊扩张严重狭窄冠脉病变后产生的无复流最为常见,通常突发大面积急性心肌缺血和心肌梗死,致心源性休克。血栓风暴通常在极短时间内发生严重冠脉血栓事件[4]。有研究报道血栓风暴的关键特征:潜在的异常高凝状态;有诱发血栓形成的因素;新血栓形成十分快速;对即时使用抗血栓药或抗凝治疗有反应;如果血栓迅速消散,则会有良好的长期预后[5]

1 血栓风暴的常见原因

许多患者具有触发血栓风暴的明显诱因[4,6],例如全身高凝状态(遗传因素、围生期[7])、应激状态(急性创伤)、急性严重感染、抗心肌磷脂综合征等[8]。此外,代谢综合征、2型糖尿病、女性均为高凝状态的独立危险因素。糖尿病患者血小板在内皮受损时易被激活,而糖尿病引起的血管内皮代谢及功能异常较易导致冠脉内血栓形成[9]。而对于冠心病特别是急性冠状动脉综合征(acute coronary syndrome,ACS)患者进行PCI时,如果没有充分的抗血小板和抗凝治疗,或者术中反复球囊高压力扩张病变血管,特别是机械性扩张冠脉闭塞性病变、弥漫性病变、严重狭窄病变(不稳定大斑块),可迅速触发血栓风暴,引起冠脉无复流或慢复流现象。急诊PCI时对冠脉内血栓处理不当,如对血栓挤压可造成血栓风暴导致慢复流或无复流现象,因此相关梗塞血管的血栓负荷是PCI中血管栓塞和无复流的独立预测因素。

2 血栓风暴的机制

引起血栓风暴的机制目前主要集中在以下方面:①血小板激活和微血管栓塞:冠脉严重狭窄病变斑块破裂时,在多种血小板激活因子(凝血酶、胶原、血小板活化因子、肾上腺素、5-羟色胺、血栓素A2、二磷酸腺苷等)作用下,血小板被激活,迅速促使血小板粘附和聚集,其膜上的糖蛋白Ⅱb/Ⅲa受体暴露(构形改变),而后与纤维蛋白原等配体结合,形成白血栓,随后激活凝血功能系统,可致混合血栓形成,引起微血管堵塞[10]。②微血管机械性堵塞:PCI时,反复球囊扩张等冠脉内机械操作使血管壁上动脉粥样硬化斑块破裂形成脂质碎片,可随血流栓塞远端微血管[11]。③内皮损伤:PCI只解决了局部血管再通功能,但是PCI术中反复的球囊扩张及局部心肌缺氧可能导致内皮损伤,触发了一系列细胞因子的级联反应,破坏微血管结构或功能,导致微血管血流缓慢,进而引起血管堵塞[12]。④外源性异物:引入动脉的导管和装置本身是外来材料,在抗凝血处理不足时易致血栓形成。所有这些因素在PCI中都可能引发血栓风暴致无复流或慢复流现象。

3 血栓风暴的诊断

在冠脉介入中,冠脉血管造影是诊断血栓风暴最常用的方法。血管内超声(intravenous ultrasound,IVUS)[13]和光学相干断层显像(optical coherence tomography,OCT)图像[14]均可判断血栓存在,但由于血栓风暴的发生十分迅速,病情瞬间恶化,以上两种方法均来不及采用。冠脉造影无复流或慢复流现象定义为血管造影显示冠脉血流分级(thrombolysis in myocardial infarction,TIMI)血流低于3级但没有远端动脉阻塞的证据。冠脉造影评估包括TIMI、TIMI心肌灌注分级(TIMI myocardial perfusion grade,TMPG)、心肌呈色分级(myocardial blush grades,MBG)和校正的TIMI计帧数(corrected TIMI frame count,CTFC)。冠状动脉造影诊断血栓判断标准是血管腔内明显的充盈缺损,在多个角度造影时均可见到并且在多个心动周期持续存在,且排除冠脉内膜夹层。冠状动脉造影可以直接显示相关动脉的部位及血流情况,观察到血栓风暴时迅速引起无复流或慢复流现象。TIMI分级仅能评估心外膜血管的再灌注水平,无法判断远端微血管血栓风暴引起的阻塞情况。CTFC是一种比较客观准确的冠脉血流指数,可从冠状动脉微循环水平进一步量化评估无复流程度,由于CTFC需要依赖微血管的阻力来测量心外膜血流,因此可以用来反映微循环功能,CTFC是左心室功能改善的强烈预测因子。MBG是评价心肌再灌注的一种新方法,无复流患者注入造影剂后,造影剂不是经无复流区微循环,而是经无复流周围侧支回流,故可通过造影剂回流时的分布和密度来了解心肌再灌注的情况。因此,以血管造影技术为基础的TIMI血流分级和心肌呈色分级简便实用,而且可以直观地判断出血栓风暴的发生。

4 血栓风暴的防治

当PCI术中发生血栓风暴时,临床医生应当分秒必争,迅速恢复冠脉血流;充分地抗血小板白血栓治疗;稳定生命体征,纠正休克血压。ACS的病理生理机制决定了抗血小板治疗是ACS药物治疗的基石,冠脉内迅速给予血小板膜糖蛋白Ⅱb/Ⅲa受体拮抗药(glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibitor,GPI)或扩血管药物可迅速消除冠脉内血栓。

4.1 GPI

在对患者进行白血栓治疗时,首选的药物即是GPI[15]。GPI是急诊PCI中必备的药物,在导致血小板聚集的众多传导通路中,阿司匹林和二磷酸腺苷受体拮抗药等仅能抑制其中的一条或部分通路,部分抑制血小板聚集。GPI则作用于最终的唯一通路, 可逆地竞争性占据Ⅱb/Ⅲa受体,阻止纤维蛋白原等与该受体的结合,从而最直接,最高效地抑制血小板聚集[16]。GPI可有效化解白血栓、逆转慢血流和无复流,另外GPI对白血栓的形成有预防作用,对溶栓后血栓再闭塞有明显抑制作用,可加快堵塞血管的开通速率。GPI主要包括替罗非班、阿昔单抗和依替巴肽,替罗非班和依替巴肽被称为“小分子GPI”,小分子GPI对其受体有较低的亲和力,并且具有较短的半衰期,因此适于在数分钟内观察到消除血栓效果。

替罗非班是一种高效的GPI,是目前临床应用的作用最强的血小板聚集抑制药,在PCI期间直接冠脉内给药可以增加局部药物浓度,能够更好地发挥抗血小板聚集作用,减轻病变部位血栓负荷和继发的冠脉远端栓塞,逆转血栓风暴所致的无复流[17]。同时,研究发现替罗非班还可以抑制血小板激活过程中所释放的大量缩血管物质和炎症因子,减轻病变血管的收缩状态和炎症反应,从而改善病变血管的血流状态[18]。另有研究表明,替罗非班还具有改善血管内皮功能的作用,其机制是抑制血流再灌注过程中炎症细胞的刺激,下调诱导型一氧化氮合酶(iNOS)活性从而减轻内皮损伤,增加具有内皮保护作用的内皮源性一氧化氮(NO)的生成,从而抑制钙离子内流,维持稳定的内环境[19]。一项Meta分析表明对于无复流患者冠脉内注射替罗非班比其他传统药物更有效[20]

有研究证实无复流时冠脉内大剂量给予替罗非班治疗可迅速改善冠脉血流,血栓风暴多发于球囊高度扩张或反复扩张后,特别是机械性扩张冠脉闭塞性病变、弥漫性病变、严重狭窄病变(不稳定大板块),提示冠状动脉粥样斑块物质被挤压入血可能是引发冠脉血栓风暴的主要触发因素[21]。目前临床常用的替罗非班治疗冠脉慢血流/无复流负荷剂量为冠脉内10~25 μg·kg-1,随后0.1~0.15 μg·kg-1·min-1静脉持续24~36 h。而大剂量替罗非班(为常规剂量的2~5倍)的良好治疗结果说明这些粥样斑块物质很可能诱发了大量血小板血栓的形成。因此,针对血栓风暴的处理,应推荐冠脉内应用替罗非班为主,对于部分严重的无复流患者可以大剂量使用直到冠脉血流明显改善。近10多年来,笔者冠脉内使用盐酸替罗非班注射液(商品名:欣维宁,每次10~80 mL,每100 mL含5 mg)成功救治了数十例血栓风暴致无复流患者,迅速恢复冠脉内血流者高达99%以上,无患者死亡和药物严重不良反应发生,临床效果十分显著。值得注意的是,对于部分高出血风险患者,不宜大剂量使用GPI,冠脉内应及时推注适量血管扩张药,包括尼可地尔、硝普钠、腺苷和钙通道阻断药等。

4.2 硝普钠

硝普钠(100~200 μg,冠脉注射)作为临床中常用的血管扩张药,能直接松弛血管平滑肌,特别是微小冠脉血管平滑肌,是一种安全有效的治疗无复流的药物。硝普钠在体内可产生NO,舒张动脉、静脉平滑肌而产生强大的扩血管作用,从而对抗微血管痉挛,还可以有效抑制血小板聚集,抗趋化作用,不需要内皮代谢即可直接转化为NO发挥作用,这是它区别硝酸甘油对血栓风暴无复流无作用的原因。另有研究发现,与腺苷相比,冠脉内应用硝普钠可以产生相同的效果,但硝普钠具有更长的增加冠脉扩张时间[22]

4.3 维拉帕米

钙通道阻断药减少钙离子内流,从而起到扩张血管的作用,其对冠状动脉主干及小动脉的扩张尤为显著,能拮抗和预防冠状动脉痉挛,维拉帕米(200 μg~1 mg,冠脉注射)能直接扩张远端缺血微动脉及较粗的小动脉,从而降低微血管阻力,改善冠脉前向血流,而且其可减轻细胞内钙超载,有效改善血管功能,减轻微血管损害,从而能有效改善心肌的灌注血流。冠脉内注入维拉帕米可提高67%~89%患者的TIMI血流[23]

4.4 尼可地尔

尼可地尔是钾通道开放药,舒张血管平滑肌,特别是微小冠脉,减少心室充盈和心脏做功,可通过减少自由基的产生和中性粒细胞的激活而减少心肌梗死再灌注患者的梗死面积和心律失常的发生,并可增高心肌血流量、减少再灌注损伤[24]。笔者近年来用尼可地尔4~6 mg冠脉内注射,处理13例PCI术中慢复流,有效率达90%。

4.5 腺苷

腺苷是一种内源性核苷代谢产物,能激动血管内皮P2受体,引起NO释放,这些机制均引起冠状动脉扩张,部分性对抗血栓风暴引起的无复流。同时,腺苷有抑制血小板聚集、减少氧自由基的产生、保护血管内皮与心肌细胞的作用。LIM等[25]对PCI术中发生无复流的患者联合应用腺苷和尼可地尔,发现联合用药可以改善心肌血流灌注提高临床预后。

4.6 预防措施

血栓风暴的预防也十分重要,在PCI术前需要充分应联合应用抗血小板药物,PCI术中适当进行血栓抽吸、减少球囊高压力机械扩张。术中出现血栓风暴时多选用冠脉内注射GPI等药物。由于ACS患者处于高凝状态,对于高血栓风险患者尽可能只解决罪犯斑块病变,可有效预防血栓风暴。发生血栓风暴时,首选冠脉内给予GPI,如果仍存在大量血栓,在充分吸栓恢复血流灌注后应停止介入手术,充分使用四联(三种抗血小板药物和低分子肝素)或三联抗栓治疗5~7 d,待血栓消除后再行介入治疗。

5 结束语

急诊PCI时血栓风暴时有发生,常引起无复流或慢复流现象,其危险性极高,严重影响了患者预后。介入医生必须迅速控制和逆转血栓风暴,及时恢复心肌组织水平的灌注,改善心肌微循环。目前,抗栓药物及器械治疗均在防治血栓风暴的发生中取得了一定疗效,但尚未有指南推荐血栓风暴的理想治疗用药和用法用量。未来需要更多关于血栓风暴发生机制的研究和药物治疗的随机对照临床研究。

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

参考文献

[1] Task force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology(ESC),STEG P G JAMES S K,et al.ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation[J].Eur Heart J,2012,33(20):2569-2619.
Guidelines summarize and evaluate all available evidence at the time of the writing process on a particular issue, with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategies for an individual patient with a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well as the risk enefit ratio of particular diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines are not substitutes but are complements for textbooks and cover the ESC Core Curriculum topics. Guidelines and recommendations should help physicians to make decisions in their daily practice. However, the final decisions concerning an individual patient must be made by the responsible physician(s). A great number of guidelines have been issued in recent years by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), as well as by other societies and organizations. Because of their impact on clinical practice, quality criteria for the development of guidelines have been established, in order to make all decisions transparent to the user. The recommendations for formulating and issuing ESC guidelines can be found on the ESC web site (http://www.escardio.org/ guidelines-surveys/esc-guidelines/about/Pages/rules-writing.aspx). ESC guidelines represent the official position of the ESC on a given topic and are regularly updated.
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs215      Magsci     URL    
[本文引用:1]
[2] HARRISON R W,AGGARWAL A,OU F S,et al.Incidence and outcomes of no-reflow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention among patients with acute myocardial infarction[J].Am J Cardiol,2013,111(2):178-184.
Previous studies describing the no-reflow phenomenon in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were largely confined to single-center studies or small registries. To better characterize the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of the no-reflow phenomenon in a large contemporary population, we analyzed patients with AMI who were undergoing PCI of native coronary artery stenoses in the CathPCI Registry from January 1, 2004 through September 5, 2008 (n = 291,380). The angiographic no-reflow phenomenon was site reported using a standardized definition. No-reflow developed in 2.3% of the patients with AMI (n = 6,553) during PCI. Older age, ST-segment elevation AMI, prolonged interval from symptom onset to admission, and cardiogenic shock were clinical variables independently associated with the development of no-reflow (p <0.001). The angiographic factors independently associated with no-reflow included longer lesion length, higher risk class C lesions, bifurcation lesions, and impaired preprocedure Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow (p <0.001). No-reflow was associated with greater in-hospital mortality (12.6% vs 3.8%, adjusted odds ratio 2.20, 95% confidence interval 1.97 to 2.47, p <0.001) and unsuccessful lesion outcome (29.7% vs 6.6%, adjusted odds ratio 4.70, 95% confidence interval 4.28 to 5.17, p <0.001) compared to patients without no-reflow. In conclusion, the development of no-reflow, although relatively uncommon during PCI for AMI, is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Upfront strategies to reduce the incidence of no-reflow could be considered for high-risk patients to improve outcomes. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2013;111:178-184)
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.09.015      Magsci    
[本文引用:1]
[3] MAGRO M,SPRINGELING T,VAN GEUNSRJ,et al.Myocardial "no-reflow" prevention[J].Curr Vasc Pharmacol,2013,11(2) :263-277.
Despite achievement of optimal epicardial coronary flow in the majority of patients treated for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), myocardial no-reflow is a common phenomenon occurring in 5 to 50% of patients. The no-reflow phenomenon is a predictor of infarct size and an independent predictor of mortality both in the short and long term. Prevention of no-reflow is therefore a crucial step in improving prognosis of patients with STEMI. Several strategies including pharmacological and mechanical ones have been developed to improve microvascular perfusion in the setting of a myocardial infarction. Prevention starts by conservation of the microvascular reserve especially in patients at high risk of acute coronary syndromes such as diabetes patients. Optimal glycaemic control and the use of statins have been shown to reduce no-reflow in this context. Reducing ischaemic time by shortening door to balloon times, administration of intracoronary GP IIb/IIIa antagonists during PPCI and the use of manual aspiration thrombectomy have been shown to result in better myocardial perfusion and improved clinical outcome in major trials. In this review we discuss some of these major trials and studies of other therapeutic options that aim to prevent the no-reflow phenomenon.
Magsci    
[本文引用:1]
[4] ORTEL T L, KITCHENS C S, ERKAN D,et al.Clinical causes and treatment of the thrombotic storm[J].Expert Rev,Hematol,2012,5(6):653-659.
[本文引用:2]
[5] KITCHENS C S.Thrombotic storm:when thrombosis begets thrombosis[J].Am J Med,1998,104(4):381-385.
ABSTRACT Patients with hypercoagulability may present with a single thrombosis and subsequently develop progressive thromboses at other sites. With inadequate therapy, the thrombotic process may self-perpetuate, leading to multiple thromboses and even death. Six cases are presented demonstrating key features of what may be termed thrombotic storm: (1) an underlying hypercoagulable disorder; (2) a provocation to initiate thrombosis; (3) rapid development of new thromboses; (4) response to prompt use of thrombolytic agent or anticoagulant therapy; and (5) remarkable good long-term prognosis if the cycle of thrombosis is interrupted. Continued activation of coagulation by fresh thrombosis is hypothesized as the cause of the syndrome, which may explain its control by anticoagulants. Whereas these unusual patients' courses most likely represent only an extreme of hypercoagulability and not a new disorder, their characteristic behavior warrants attention.
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00061-8      PMID:9576413      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[6] KITCHENS C S,ERKAN D,BRANDAO L R,et al.Thrombotic storm revisited:preliminary diagnostic criteria suggested by the thrombotic storm study group[J].Am J Med,2011,124(4):290-296.
Physicians periodically encounter patients with an extraordinarily accelerated course of hypercoagulability who develop thromboses in multiple organ systems over days to weeks. Such patients may harbor underlying hypercoagulable clinical conditions, but their clinical course sets them apart from most patients with similar risk factors. Underlying triggers of "thrombotic storm" include pregnancy, inflammation, trauma, surgery, and infection. Aggressive anticoagulant therapy may control thrombotic storm, yet thrombotic storm may resume with even brief interruptions of anticoagulant therapy. The authors of this communication formed the Thrombotic Storm Study Group in order to identify clinical characteristics of such patients, thus constructing preliminary criteria to better define, identify, and study the course of patients deemed to have thrombotic storm. The characteristics culled from these 10 patients are: younger age (oldest was 38 years old at time of presentation); at least 2 arterial or venous (or both) thromboembolic events, typically in unusual sites with or without microangiopathy; unexplained recurrence; and frequently proceeded by a trigger. The following characteristics were not used in defining thrombotic storm: underlying malignancies; use of acute myocardial infarction as a defining arterial event in the setting of established coronary artery disease; use of cocaine; thrombotic complications expected with various intravascular devices; known paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria or myeloproliferative disorders; severe trauma; and premorbid conditions. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. The American Journal of Medicine (2011) 124, 290- 296
DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.018      Magsci    
[本文引用:1]
[7] ARYAL M R,BADAL M,BHANDARI N,et al.Accelerated arterial and venous clots in a young pregnant woman:a saga of thrombotic storm[J]. BMJ Case Rep,2013.
ABSTRACT Thrombotic storm is a rare condition, characterised by serial thrombotic events, which escalates rapidly within a few days to a few weeks involving multiple and unusual sites. Since it usually responds to anticoagulation and is often lethal if not treated promptly, early diagnosis is crucial. We describe a case of a young pregnant woman with multiple acute arterial and venous thrombotic events including stroke and myocardial infarction, who successfully recovered with continued anticoagulation therapy.
DOI:10.1136/bcr-2013-009776      PMID:23715841      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[8] JEREMI C K,STEFANOVIC A,LJUBIC A,et al.Multiorgan thrombotic disorder in a young patient with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and ovarian tumor[J].Eur J Gynaecol Oncol,2013,34(3):273-274.
Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is a life-threatening condition with high mortality rate besides aggressive multimodal treatment. Underlying triggers of "thrombotic and cytokine storm" include pregnancy, inflammation, trauma, surgery, and infection. The authors present a case of a young female patient with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) who was admitted to the hospital due to abdominal pain caused by ovarian tumor with elevated tumor markers. After the prophylactic anticoagulants and antibiotic treatment, surgery was performed. Suddenly after treatment, her clinical status deteriorated and she died regardless of intensive immunosupresive and anticoagulant therapy attempts. This condition requires all clinical awareness, timely diagnosis, and therapeutical approach, including a better understanding of the pathophysiology that leads to CAPS.
Magsci    
[本文引用:1]
[9] ZHAO J L,FAN C M,YANG Y J,et al.Chronic pretreatment of metformin is associated with the reduction of the no-reflow phenomenon in patients with diabetes mellitus after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction[J].Cardiovasc Ther,2013,31(1):60-64.
Introduction: Metformin is one of the most commonly prescribed antihyperglycemic agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. However, little is known about the effect of metformin on no-reflow in diabetic patients. Aim: In this study, we investigated retrospectively whether chronic pretreatment with metformin was associated with no-reflow in diabetic patients who underwent primary coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Results: A total of 154 consecutive diabetic patients who underwent primary angioplasty for a first ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were studied. No-reflow was defined as a final TIMI flow of =2 or final TIMI flow of 3 with a myocardial blush grade of <2. The no-reflow phenomenon was found in 53 of 154 patients. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the patients with and without metformin pretreatment. However, the 65 patients receiving chronic metformin treatment before admission had lower incidence of the no-reflow than those without it (4.2 and 14.6%, P < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that absence of metformin pretreatment was a significant predictor of the no-reflow along with high-burden thrombus, ejection fraction on admission and anterior AMI. Conclusion: These results suggested that chronic pretreatment with metformin may be associated with the reduction of the no-reflow phenomenon in patients with diabetes mellitus after primary angioplasty for AMI.
[本文引用:1]
[10] WOO S I,PARK S D,KIM D H,et al.Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for preserving the index of microcirculatory resistance:a randomized study[J].Eurointervention,2014,9(9):1057-1062.
Aims: We aimed to investigate whether thrombus aspiration could preserve the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods and results: Sixty-three patients with STEMI were randomised into two groups: primary PCI after thrombus aspiration (aspiration group, n=33) and primary PCI without thrombus aspiration (non-aspiration group, n=30). IMR was measured using a pressure-temperature sensor-tipped coronary wire. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and at six-month follow-up. No significant differences in baseline ejection fraction (EF, 47.3±8.5% vs. 49.5±7.8%, p=0.281) and baseline wall motion score index (WMSI, 1.45±0.31 vs. 1.37±0.27, p=0.299) were observed between the two groups. However, significant differences in IMR (23.5±10.2 U vs. 34.2±21.7 U, p=0.018), %E2%88%86EF (follow-up EF - baseline EF; 3.33±4.6% vs. 0.73±1.9%, p=0.005), and %E2%88%86WMSI (follow-up WMSI - baseline WMSI; -0.121±0.16 vs. -0.004±0.07, p=0.001) were observed between the two groups. Conclusions: Thrombus aspiration as an adjunctive method to primary PCI for STEMI may preserve microvascular integrity and have beneficial effects on myocardial microcirculation.
DOI:10.4244/EIJV9I9A179      PMID:24457277      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[11] NICCOLI G,KHARBANDAR K,CREA F,et al.No-reflow:again prevention is better than treatment[J].Eur Heart J,2010,31(20):2449-2455.
No abstract available.
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq299      PMID:20837571      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[12] NOMOTO K,WATANABE I,OBA T,et al.Safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing emergency procedure[J].Circ J, 2008,72(7):1054-1058.
[本文引用:1]
[13] AHMED K,JEONG M H,CHAKRABORTY R,et al.Role of intravascular ultrasound in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Am J Cardiol,2011,108(1):8-14.
Stent thrombosis and restenosis remain drawbacks of drug-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance for stent deployment helps optimize its results in stable patients. The aim of this study was to examine the utility of routine IVUS guidance in patients with AMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Employing data from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR), we analyzed 14,329 patients with AM! from April 2006 through September 2010. Patients with cardiogenic shock and rescue PCI after thrombolysis were excluded. Clinical outcomes of 2,127 patients who underwent IVUS-guided PCI were compared to those of 8,235 patients who did not. Mean age was 63.6 +/- 13.5 years and 72.3% were men. Patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI were younger, more often men, more hyperlipemic, and had increased body mass index and left ventricular ejection fraction. Number of treated vessels and stents used, stent length, and stent diameter were increased in the IVUS-guided group. Multivessel involvement was less frequent and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association type C lesion was more frequent in the IVUS-guided group. Drug-eluting stents were more frequently used compared to bare-metal stents in the IVUS group. There was no significant relation of stent thrombosis between the 2 groups. Twelve-month all-cause death was lower in the IVUS group. After multivariate analysis and propensity score adjustment, IVUS guidance was not an independent predictor for 12-month all-cause death (hazard ratio 0.212, 0.026 to 1.73, p = 0.148). In conclusion, this study does not support routine use of IVUS guidance for stent deployment in patients who present with AMI and undergo PCI. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2011;108:8-14)
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.02.339      Magsci    
[本文引用:1]
[14] KUBO T,IMANISHI T,KASHIWAGI M,et al.Multiplecoronary lesioninst ability in patients with acute myocardial infarction as determined by optical coherence tomography[J].Am J Cardiol,2010,105(3):318-322.
Autopsy studies have suggested that (AMI) represents a pan-coronary process of vulnerable plaque development. We performed multifocal optical coherence tomographic (OCT) examination to compare coronary lesion instability between AMI and (SAP). A total of 42 patients with AMI (n = 26) or SAP (n = 16) who had multivessel disease and underwent multivessel coronary intervention were enrolled in the present study. The OCT examination was performed not only in the -related/, but also in the noninfarct-related/nontarget lesions. OCT-derived thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) was defined as a lesion with a fibrous cap thickness of <65 microm. In the -related/, plaque rupture (77% vs 7%, p <0.001) and intracoronary (100% vs 0%, p <0.001) were observed more frequently in AMI than in SAP. The fibrous cap thickness (57 + or - 12 vs 180 + or - 65 microm, p <0.001) was significantly thinner in AMI and the frequency of OCT-derived TCFA (85% vs 13%, p <0.001) was significantly greater in AMI than in SAP. In the noninfarct-related/nontarget lesions, the frequency of plaque rupture was not different between the 2 groups. Intracoronary was observed in 8% of AMI, but it was not found in SAP. The fibrous cap thickness (111 + or - 65 vs 181 + or - 70 microm, p = 0.002) was significantly thinner in AMI and the frequency of OCT-derived TCFA (38% vs 6%, p = 0.030) was significantly greater in AMI than in SAP. Multiple OCT-derived TCFAs in both the -related/target and the noninfarct-related/nontarget lesions were observed in 38% of patients with AMI but not in patients with SAP (p = 0.007). In conclusion, the present OCT examination demonstrated multiple lesion instability in the presence of AMI.
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.09.032      PMID:20102942      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[15] VAN'T HOF A W,VALGIMIGLI M.Defining the role of platelet glycoprotein receptor inhibitors in STEMI:focus on tirofiban[J].Drugs,2009,69(1):85-100.
Tirofiban is a small molecule, nonpeptide tyrosine derivative. Although similar to abciximab in that it has a high specificity and affinity for the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor, tirofiban dissociates from the GP IIb/IIIa receptor more rapidly than abciximab. Additionally, the action of tirofiban is reversed within hours after completion of the infusion, whereas abciximab binds irreversibly resulting in a considerably longer effect. The efficacy of tirofiban in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been demonstrated when administered in patients being managed with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). These trials primarily studied tirofiban utilizing the high-dose bolus regimen (25 microg/kg bolus followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.15 microg/kg/min for 18-24 hours). The On-TIME (Ongoing Tirofiban in Myocardial Infarction Evaluation) 2 trial assessed early administration of the high-dose bolus regimen of tirofiban either at the referral centre or in the ambulance, in patients being transferred to a primary PCI centre. Early use of tirofiban resulted in both a significant increase in the rate of complete resolution of ST-segment deviation pre- and post-PCI, and improvement in clinical outcomes at 30 days. Moreover, the multi-factorial MULTISTRATEGY (Multicentre Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban vs Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial, which compared the high-dose bolus regimen of tirofiban with standard dose administration of abciximab administered immediately prior to PCI, revealed similar effects on myocardial perfusion, ST-segment elevation recovery and clinical outcomes between the two agents, and confirmed the safety of tirofiban when used in combination with drug-eluting stents in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. These studies showed tirofiban to be a well tolerated and effective GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. On the basis of the demonstrated bene
DOI:10.2165/00003495-200969010-00006      PMID:19192938      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[16] XU Q,YIN J,SI LY,et al.Efficacy and safety of early versus late glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibitors for PCI[J].Int J Cardiol,2013,162(3):210-219.
Background: Glycoprotein (Gp) IIb/IIIa inhibitors are beneficial for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, optimal drug timing remains inconclusive. Therefore, this study was to perform a meta-analysis of the clinical efficiency and safety of early versus late GpIIb/IIIa inhibitors in STEMI patients undergoing PCI.<br/>Methods: A comprehensive search was to identify randomized trials of early versus late GpIIb/IIIa inhibitors in STEMI patients undergoing PCI. The GpIIb/IIIa inhibitors were abciximab and small-molecular Gp inhibitors (SMGP) namely eptifibatide and tirofiban. The efficacy endpoints included pre-procedural Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow, post-procedural TIMI 3 flow, complete ST-segment resolution, left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF), and mortality. The safety endpoint was the occurrence of major bleeding complications.<br/>Results: Nineteen trials were included in the meta-analysis, involving 4209 patients (early 2124 versus late 2085). Early GpIIb/IIIa inhibitors significantly improved pre-procedural TIMI 3 flow, while early abciximab, but not SMGP, further enhanced post-procedural TIMI 3 flow, complete ST-segment resolution, LVEF, and reduced six-month mortality. In addition to clopidogrel loading, only early abciximab improved pre-procedural TIMI 3 flow and complete ST-segment resolution. The rate of major bleeding complications was not increased in early GpIIb/IIIa inhibitors with/without clopidogrel loading.<br/>Conclusions: Early GpIIb/IIIa inhibitors improved pre-procedural TIMI 3 flow and early abciximab provided favorable clinical outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing PCI. On the basis of clopidogrel loading, early abciximab enhanced pre-procedural TIMI 3 flow and ST-segment resolution. These beneficial effects were achieved without increased risks of major bleeding complications. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.06.001      Magsci    
[本文引用:1]
[17] AKPEK M,SAHIN O,SARLI B,et al.Acute effects of intracoronary tirofiban on no-reflow phenomena in patients with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Angiology, 2015,66(6):560-567.
Abstract We evaluated the acute effect of intracoronary administration of tirofiban on no-reflow phenomenon in patients with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Consecutive patients (n = 162) were randomized into 2 groups based on whether intracoronary tirofiban was administered. After the administration of intracoronary tirofiban, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade significantly increased (P < .001) and successful reperfusion was achieved in 26 (32%) patients. In the placebo group, however, after the administration of intracoronary placebo the TIMI flow grade did not change (P = .070), and successful reperfusion was achieved only in 8 (10%) patients. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were significantly lower in the tirofiban group (36% vs 19%, P = .013). Intracoronary administration of tirofiban significantly improves TIMI flow grade and is associated with a lower in-hospital rate of MACE.
DOI:10.1177/0003319714545780      PMID:25092681      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[18] VAN'T H A W,TEN B J,HEESTERMANS T,et al.Prehospital initiation of tirofiban in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty (on-TIME 2) :a multicentre,double-blind,randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet,2008,372(9638):537-546.
Abstract BACKGROUND: The most effective magnitude and timing of antiplatelet therapy is important in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We investigated whether the results of primary coronary angioplasty (PCI) can be improved by the early administration of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blocker tirofiban at first medical contact in the ambulance or referral centre. METHODS: We undertook a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial in 24 centres in the Netherlands, Germany, and Belgium. Between June 29, 2006, and Nov 13, 2007, 984 patients with STEMI who were candidates to undergo PCI were randomly assigned to either high-bolus dose tirofiban (n=491) or placebo (N=493) in addition to aspirin (500 mg), heparin (5000 IU), and clopidogrel (600 mg). Randomisation was by blinded sealed kits with study drug, in blocks of four. The primary endpoint was the extent of residual ST-segment deviation 1 h after PCI. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered, number ISRCTN06195297. FINDINGS: 936 (95%) patients were randomly assigned to treatment after a prehospital diagnosis of myocardial infarction in the ambulance. Median time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis was 76 min (IQR 35-150). Mean residual ST deviation before PCI (10.9 mm [SD 9.2] vs 12.1 mm [9.4], p=0.028) and 1 h after PCI (3.6 mm [4.6] vs 4.8 mm [6.3], p=0.003) was significantly lower in patients pretreated with high-bolus dose tirofiban than in those assigned to placebo. The rate of major bleeding did not differ significantly between the two groups (19 [4%] vs 14 [3%]; p=0.36). INTERPRETATION: Our finding that routine prehospital initiation of high-bolus dose tirofiban improved ST-segment resolution and clinical outcome after PCI, emphasises that further platelet aggregation inhibition besides high-dose clopidogrel is mandated in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI.
DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61235-0      PMID:187079851      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[19] NICCOLI G,COSENTINO N,SPAZIANI C,et al.New strategies for the management of no-reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther,2011,9(5):615-630.
[本文引用:1]
[20] QIN T,XIE L,CHEN M H.Meta-analysis of randomized controlledtrials on the efficacy and safety of intracoronary administration of tirofiban for no-reflow phenomenon[J].BMC Cardiovasc Disord,2013,13:68.
Currently, there is still a lack of an optimal treatment for no-reflow phenomenon (NR). The aim of this simple meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intracoronary (IC) administration of tirofiban compared with other conventional drugs during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for NR.
DOI:10.1186/1471-2261-13-68      PMID:24016038      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[21] 周强,刘磊,肖志超,.冠状动脉内推注大剂量替罗非班治疗冠状动脉介入术中无复流,2015,21(6):410-412.
[本文引用:1]
[22] PARHAM W A,BOUHASIN A,CIARAMITA J P,et al.Coronary hyperemic dose responses of intracoronary sodium nitroprusside[J].Circulation,2004, 109(10):1236-1243.
ABSTRACT Sodium nitroprusside is one of several agents considered effective for treating the no-reflow phenomenon during acute coronary interventions. However, the coronary hyperemic dose responses and systemic hemodynamic effects of intracoronary nitroprusside have yet to be determined in humans. The purpose of this study was to compare the hyperemic and hemodynamic responses of intracoronary nitroprusside to intracoronary adenosine in patients during cardiac catheterization with angiographically normal anterior descending arteries. In 21 patients, coronary blood flow velocity (0.014-inch Doppler flow wire), heart rate, and blood pressure were measured in unobstructed left anterior descending coronary arteries at rest, after intracoronary adenosine (30- to 50-microg boluses), and after 3 serial doses (0.3-, 0.6-, and 0.9-microg/kg boluses) of intracoronary nitroprusside. Coronary reserve was calculated as hyperemia/basal coronary flow velocity. In an additional 9 patients with intermediate stenoses (53+/-7%), 14 fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements (using 0.014-inch pressure wire) were performed with both intracoronary adenosine and nitroprusside (0.6 microg/kg). Intracoronary nitroprusside produced equivalent coronary hyperemia with a longer duration ( approximately 25%) compared with intracoronary adenosine. Intracoronary nitroprusside (0.9 microg/kg) decreased systolic blood pressure by <20%, with minimal change in heart rate, whereas intracoronary adenosine had no effect on these parameters. FFR measurements with intracoronary nitroprusside were identical to those obtained with intracoronary adenosine (r=0.97). Compared with adenosine, intracoronary nitroprusside produces an equivalent but more prolonged coronary hyperemic response in normal coronary arteries. Intracoronary nitroprusside, in doses commonly used for the treatment of the no-reflow phenomenon, can produce sustained coronary hyperemia without detrimental systemic hemodynamics. On the basis of FFR measurements compared with adenosine, sodium nitroprusside also appears to be a suitable hyperemic stimulus for coronary physiological measurements.
DOI:10.1161/01.CIR.0000118470.52908.D9      PMID:14993141      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[23] GALASSO G,SCHIEKOFER S,D’ANNA C,et al.No-reflow phenomenon:pathophysiology,diagnosis,prevention,and treatment.A review of the current literature and future perspectives[J].Angiology,2014,65(3):180-189.
No-reflow is responsible for 40% of the primary percutaneous coronary intervention without complete myocardial reperfusion despite successful reopening of the infarct-related artery. This review...
DOI:10.1177/0003319712474336      PMID:23362304      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[24] SHEHATA M.Cardioprotective effects of oral nicorandil use in diabetic patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention[J].J Interv Cardiol,2014,27(5):472-481.
ABSTRACT Myocardial injury commonly occurs during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Several agents that mimic ischemic preconditioning could help minimize this phenomenon. This study evaluated the cardioprotective role of intracoronary Adenosine in elective PCI. 100 diabetic patients with chronic stable angina were prospectively enrolled, then randomly assigned to undergo PCI with intracoronary Adenosine; 100 μg/stented vessel (group-A,50patients) or standard PCI (group-B,50patients). Cardiac Troponin I (cTnI) & Creatine KinaseMB (CKMB) levels were measured before & 6, 12 and 24 hours postPCI. Mean age of the study cohort was 57 ± 8 years (males=63%). cTnI level was significantly lower in group-A (6 hours: 7.5 ± 0.2 vs. 15.5 ± 0.5 pg/mL,12 hours: 13.7 ± 0.7 vs. 25.5 ± 0.6 pg/mL and 24 hours: 7.6 ± 0.5 vs. 16 ± 0.3 pg/mL, P< 0.001). After 3 months, the same group showed significantly higher left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF %) i.e. 64.5 ± 5.7 vs. 56.5 ± 5.3 (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between both groups of patients regarding incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). In diabetic patients undergoing elective PCI, intracoronary Adenosine was associated with decreased incidence of PCI-related myocardial injury & improvement of LVEF% after 3 months.
DOI:10.1111/joic.12142      PMID:25174952      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[25] LIM S Y,BAE E H,JEONG M H,et al.Effect of combined intracoronary adenosis and nicordial on no-reflow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Circulation,2004,109(10):1236-1243.
[本文引用:1]
资源
PDF下载数    
RichHTML 浏览数    
摘要点击数    

分享
导出

相关文章:
关键词(key words)
替罗非班
血栓风暴
冠脉介入

Tirofiban
Thrombotic Storm
Percutaneous coronary int...

作者
张欣欣
许祥玉
郭小梅

ZHANG Xinxin
XU Xiangyu
GUO Xiaomei