中国科技论文统计源期刊 中文核心期刊  
美国《化学文摘》《国际药学文摘》
《乌利希期刊指南》
WHO《西太平洋地区医学索引》来源期刊  
日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)
第七届湖北十大名刊提名奖  
医药导报, 2020, 39(10): 1366-1374
doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1004-0781.2020.10.009
基于美国FAERS数据库亮丙瑞林和戈舍瑞林不良反应信号检测
Study on ADR Signal Detection of Leuprolide and Goserelin Based on the US FAERS Database
陈乾1,2,3,4,, 陈力1,2,3,, 程艺5

摘要:

目的 挖掘和评价促性腺激素释放激素激动剂类代表药物亮丙瑞林和戈舍瑞林上市后安全警戒信号,为两药的临床安全使用提供参考。方法 调取美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统 ( FAERS) 数据库2009年第1季度至 2019年第1季度接收的亮丙瑞林和戈舍瑞林的药品不良事件 ( ADE) 报告,采用报告比值比(ROR)法和比例报告比值(PRR)法进行不良反应 ( ADR) 信号挖掘,使用世界卫生组织(WHO)不良反应术语对报告中的不良反应描述用语进行标准化,筛选出有信号的不良反应进行分析和比较。结果 最终得到亮丙瑞林不良反应信号52个,戈舍瑞林不良反应信号100个,其中有17个信号为两者的重叠信号。亮丙瑞林较为特异的ADR有肺门淋巴结肿大、纵隔淋巴结肿大;戈舍瑞林较为特异的ADR有拔毛癖、失眠型睡眠障碍、恐慌症、胃扩张及听觉过敏。结论 该研究有效利用 ROR 法和 PRR 法挖掘出亮丙瑞林和戈舍瑞林的不良反应信号,为临床合理用药提供参考依据。

关键词: 亮丙瑞林 ; 戈舍瑞林 ; 不良反应信号 ; 比例失衡法 ; 报告比值比法 ; 比例报告比值法

Abstract:

Objective To explore and evaluate the post-marketing safety warning signals of leuprolide and goserelin, the representative drugs of GnRHa, and to provide references for the safe use of the two drugs. Methods The adverse drug event (ADE) of leuprolide and goserellin received by the US FAERS from the first quarter of 2009 to the first quarter of 2019 were collected, and the adverse drug reactions (ADR) signal mining was performed by reporting odds ratio (ROR) method and proportional reporting ratio (PRR) method.ADR description terms in the reports were standardized with WHO adverse reaction terminology.Signals of adverse reactions which were screened out were analyzed and compared. Results Total 52 ADR signals of leuprolide and 100 ADR signals of goserellin were obtained, of which 17 signals were overlapped.The most specific ADR signals of leuprolide included hilar lymphadenopathy and mediastinal lymphadenopathy; the most specific ADR signals of goserellin included depilation, insomnia, panic disorder, gastric dilatation, and auditory hypersensitivity. Conclusion In this study, ROR and PRR methods were used to explore and compare the adverse reaction signals of leuprolide and goserellin, and to provide references for clinical rational drug use.

Key words: Leuprolide ; Goserelin ; ADR signals ; Measures of disproportionality ; Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) ; Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR)

开放科学(资源服务)标识码(OSID)

促性腺激素释放激素激动剂 (GnRH-a) 是人工合成的促性腺激素释放激素 (GnRH) 衍生物,作用强,半衰期长,给药初期可以刺激促性腺激素的释放,持续给药使垂体 GnRH 受体脱敏或下调,抑制促性腺激素的释放,从而抑制性腺功能[1];临床广泛应用于辅助生殖领域[2]以及子宫内膜异位症、子宫平滑肌瘤、乳腺癌、前列腺癌、中枢性性早熟等性激素依赖性疾病[3,4]。其中,戈舍瑞林、亮丙瑞林是临床常用GnRH-a类药物,目前均已在国内上市,且仍有多项多剂型和规格的产品正处于临床试验阶段,其较为明显的不良反应主要与低雌激素血症相关的症状,用药后患者可提前出现绝经期症状,包括潮热、盗汗、烦躁、失眠、情绪不稳定、阴道干燥、性欲减退、关节疼痛以及骨质疏松等。目前国内已有关于亮丙瑞林和戈舍瑞林不良反应的一些临床观察,但笔者尚未见关于亮丙瑞林和戈舍瑞林不良反应信号(advers drug reaction signals,ADR signals)的系统分析[5,6];且由于临床试验的局限性,如样本量小、试验对象准入标准严格和随访时间有限等,临床试验数据可能无法全面反映ADR信息。因此,笔者应用数据挖掘方法对亮丙瑞林和戈舍瑞林在上市后真实世界中的ADR信号进行检测和比较,以期为临床安全合理用药提供参考。

1 资料与方法
1.1 资料来源

本研究数据来源于美国食品药品管理局(FDA)不良事件报告系统(FDA adverse event reporting system,FAERS)。FAERS数据报告者为医务工作者或用药患者,其数据库报告的不良反应信息来自自发呈报,主要收集发生在美国境内外用药相关的自发性安全报告及上市后临床研究报告。FAERS数据库自2004年开始对外公开,其数据通常每季度进行更新。本研究主要提取FAERS数据库中2009年第1季度至2019年第1季度共41个季度亮丙瑞林和戈舍瑞林的ADR报告;排除重复报告后,共得到“首要怀疑药物”的相关报告33 166 415例,从中分别筛选出用药名称为亮丙瑞林、戈舍瑞林且为首要怀疑药物的报告分别为2 276,7 548例。

1.2 方法

比例失衡法(measures of dispropor-tionality)在目前国内外ADR信号检测的数据挖掘中应用广泛,其原理是将目标药物-事件的出现频率与背景频率的差异进行比较,即在一个包含所有药物事件报告的数据库中,当目标药物事件组合(drug event combination,DEC)的出现频率明显高于整个数据库的背景频率,并且达到设定的阈值,就认为产生一个信号(signal)[7]。本次研究使用比例失衡法中报告比值比法(reporting odds ratio,ROR)与比例报告比值法(proportional reporting ratio,PRR),两种方法具有计算简单、能估计相对危险度、减少由于对照组选择所带来的偏倚、计算结果一致性好的特点[8]。比例失衡法均采用四格表,再利用对应的公式进行不同方式计算出ROR值和PRR值,该值数值越大,信号就越强,说明目标药物与目标ADR之间统计学联系越强,见表1。

表1 比例失衡法所用四格表
Tab.1 Fourfold table of Measures of Disproportionality
药品种类 目标ADR
报告数
其他ADR
报告数
合计
目标药物 a b a+b
其他药物 c d c+d
合计 a+c b+d N=a+b+c+d

表1 比例失衡法所用四格表

Tab.1 Fourfold table of Measures of Disproportionality

ROR=(a/c)/(b/d);ROR 的95%置信区间(CI)=exp(ln(ROR)±1.96 1 / a + 1 / b + 1 / c + 1 / d ),a>3。ROR的95%CI下限>1,则提示生成一个信号。

PRR=[a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)];

PRR的 95%CI=exp(ln(PRR)±1.96 1 / a - 1 / ( a + b ) + 1 / c - 1 / ( c + d ) ),a>3;PRR的95%CI下限>1,则提示生成一个信号。

1.3 数据处理

源于自发呈报系统的ADR描述用语具有多样性,因此需要使用特定的术语集或字典将其重新编码能使原本复杂多样的ADR描述用语标准化,以便研究统计。本研究使用WHO药品不良反应术语集对报告中的ADR描述用语进行标准化,主要应用的术语有系统器官分类(system organclass,SOC)和PT,其中SOC为ADR的分类,PT为ADR的标准名称。

将表格中PT 栏含义相同的报告整理为WHO药品不良反应术语集中的标准写法以免在后续进行统计时出现相同项目重复统计的错误。数据标准化将不规范的习惯用语转化成标准化信息,为数据利用如信号检测和数据挖掘提供了基础[9]

因为PT值较大,所以进行2次筛选。筛选出报告数>3的PT,整理出四格表中各值。通过ROR法与PRR法分别计算相应ROR值、PRR值及各自的95%CI下限。ROR法出现信号的判别方式为:若报告例数>3,ROR 95%CI的下限>1,则提示生成一个信号。PRR法出现信号的判别方式为:若报告例数>3,PRR值>2,PRR 95%CI的下限>1,则提示生成一个信号。

2 结果
2.1 ADR发生频次结果

将筛选出的PT用ROR法和PRR法进行计算后,共得到亮丙瑞林ADR信号75个,戈舍瑞林ADR信号173个,其中ROR法和PRR法信号均重合;经过剔除非用药因素(如手术、放射治疗、管理问题等)或原发疾病引起的ADR,并对相同ADR进行合并,最终得到亮丙瑞林ADR信号52个,戈舍瑞林ADR信号100个。

将最终得到ADR信号按照发生频次降序排列,其中,亮丙瑞林报告前10位依次为:热潮红、骨折、注射部位硬结、发热、间质性肺疾病、肺炎、心力衰竭、注射部位反应、体质量增加、消瘦(表2);戈舍瑞林报告前10位依次为热潮红、间质性肺疾病、注射部位血肿、跌倒发作、关节痛、乏力、骨折、体质量增加、肌无力、注射部位出血(表3)。可以看出,两药发生频次前10位中共同的ADR信号包括:热潮红、骨折、注射部位损害、间质性肺疾病以及体质量增加。

表2 亮丙瑞林ADR信号报告频次(按降序排列)
Tab.2 Report frequency of ADR signals of leuprolide (in descending order)
排序 ADR 频次(%) ROR值
[95%CI(ROR)]
排序 ADR 频次(%) ROR值
[95%CI(ROR)]
1 热潮红 68(2.99) 26.24(20.61) 27 男子乳房发育 7(0.31) 3.07(1.46)
2 骨折 47(2.07) 4.96(3.71) 28 血睾酮升高 6(0.26) 70.18(31.44)
3 注射部位硬结 40(1.76) 15.52(11.35) 29 纵隔淋巴结肿大 6(0.26) 69.18(30.99)
4 发热 36(1.58) 2.67(1.92) 30 尿路梗阻 6(0.26) 40.86(18.32)
5 间质性肺疾病 34(1.49) 18.35(13.08) 31 机化性肺炎 6(0.26) 32.9(14.75)
6 肺炎 22(0.97) 1.73(1.14) 32 腕管综合征 6(0.26) 9.66(4.33)
7 心力衰竭 21(0.92) 2.58(1.68) 33 躁狂 6(0.26) 9.16(4.11)
8 注射部位反应 19(0.83) 5.97(3.8) 34 月经过多 6(0.26) 5.17(2.32)
9 体质量增加 17(0.75) 2.06(1.28) 35 细菌性结膜炎 5(0.22) 327.43(134.83)
10 消瘦 14(0.62) 352.67(207.23) 36 非传染性膀胱炎 5(0.22) 104.46(43.3)
11 注射部位肉芽肿 13(0.57) 77.03(44.6) 37 睑腺炎 5(0.22) 46.68(19.38)
12 血液碱性磷酸酶增加 13(0.57) 12.07(6.99) 38 注射部位脓肿 5(0.22) 6.15(2.56)
13 血红蛋白下降 13(0.57) 3.02(1.75) 39 帕金森病 5(0.22) 5.72(2.38)
14 肺栓塞 12(0.53) 2.43(1.38) 40 吸入性肺炎 5(0.22) 5.21(2.16)
15 情绪波动 11(0.48) 7.80(4.31) 41 癫痫 5(0.22) 4.5(1.87)
16 血尿 11(0.48) 6.92(3.83) 42 多器官衰竭 5(0.22) 3.67(1.52)
17 骨质疏松症 11(0.48) 4.62(2.55) 43 肺门淋巴结肿大 4(0.18) 101.72(38.01)
18 多汗症 11(0.48) 2.17(1.2) 44 腰围增加 4(0.18) 83.05(31.06)
19 注射部位红斑 11(0.48) 2.14(1.18) 45 变应性肺泡炎 4(0.18) 58.92(22.05)
20 脑梗死 10(0.44) 9.02(4.85) 46 卵巢过度刺激综合征 4(0.18) 57.41(21.49)
21 尿潴留 10(0.44) 7.66(4.12) 47 子宫息肉 4(0.18) 47.39(17.74)
22 肝功能异常 10(0.44) 2.88(1.55) 48 心瓣膜关闭不全 4(0.18) 27.18(10.18)
23 流行性感冒样症状 9(0.4) 2.32(1.21) 49 毛发生长异常 4(0.18) 13.47(5.05)
24 脂肪肝 8(0.35) 10.30(5.14) 50 心肌病 4(0.18) 6.02(2.26)
25 糖尿病 8(0.35) 2.41(1.21) 51 高脂血症 4(0.18) 4.95(1.86)
26 子宫不规则出血 7(0.31) 7.55(3.59) 52 谵妄 4(0.18) 3.25(1.22)

①均表示未在说明书中出现的PT。

①means PT not included in the spectification.

表2 亮丙瑞林ADR信号报告频次(按降序排列)

Tab.2 Report frequency of ADR signals of leuprolide (in descending order)

表3 戈舍瑞林ADR信号报告频次(按降序排列)
Tab.3 Report frequency of ADR signals of goserelin (in descending order)
排序 ADR 频次(%) ROR值
[95%CI(ROR)]
排序 ADR 频次(%) ROR值
[95%CI(ROR)]
1 热潮红 158(2.09) 18.26(15.59) 45 月经紊乱 11(0.15) 10.26(5.68)
2 间质性肺疾病 80(1.06) 12.98(10.41) 46 尿频 11(0.15) 2.00(1.10)
3 注射部位血肿 77(1.02) 9.18(7.33) 47 垂体出血 11(0.15) 198.34(108.35)
4 跌倒发作 71(0.94) 1.53(1.21) 48 勃起功能障碍 10(0.13) 3.24(1.74)
5 关节痛 66(0.87) 1.36(1.07) 49 日常活动障碍 10(0.13) 2.12(1.14)
6 乏力 63(0.83) 1.29(1.01) 50 乳房胀大 9(0.12) 16.86(8.76)
7 骨折 56(0.74) 1.46(1.12) 51 闭经 9(0.12) 3.72(1.93)
8 体质量增加 50(0.66) 1.82(1.38) 52 四肢麻木 9(0.12) 2.31(1.20)
9 肌无力 48(0.64) 2.60(1.96) 53 发冷 9(0.12) 2.44(1.27)
10 注射部位出血 45(0.6) 5.01(3.74) 54 心肌病 9(0.12) 4.08(2.12)
11 多汗症 43(0.57) 2.07(1.54) 55 血细胞计数异常 8(0.11) 3.57(1.79)
12 肝功能异常 41(0.54) 2.12(1.56) 56 γ-谷氨酰转移酶升高 8(0.11) 2.54(1.27)
13 食欲减退 40(0.53) 1.37(1.0) 57 听觉过敏 8(0.11) 17.55(8.76)
14 感觉迟钝 32(0.42) 1.52(1.08) 58 失眠型睡眠障碍 7(0.09) 18.69(8.89)
15 自杀意念 27(0.36) 2.17(1.49) 59 恐慌症 7(0.09) 12.95(6.16)
16 骨痛 25(0.33) 2.96(2.0) 60 幻听 7(0.09) 3.55(1.69)
17 腹胀 25(0.33) 1.94(1.31) 61 脊髓压迫症 7(0.09) 11.72(5.58)
18 心房颤动 24(0.32) 1.89(1.26) 62 激素水平异常 7(0.09) 10.13(4.82)
19 心力衰竭 22(0.29) 2.11(1.39) 63 注射部位炎症 7(0.09) 6.88(3.28)
20 骨质疏松症 21(0.28) 3.74(2.44) 64 注射部位疼痛 7(0.09) 2.20(1.05)
21 血尿 20(0.26) 2.48(1.60) 65 耳部不适 7(0.09) 5.42(2.58)
22 性欲降低 20(0.26) 6.75(4.35) 66 变异型心绞痛 7(0.09) 47.57(22.58)
23 慢性阻塞性肺疾病 19(0.25) 2.35(1.50) 67 直立性低血压 6(0.08) 2.94(1.32)
24 认知障碍 19(0.25) 3.06(1.95) 68 血压异常 6(0.08) 2.25(1.01)
25 液体潴留 17(0.23) 2.33(1.45) 69 光敏反应 6(0.08) 2.95(1.32)
26 胸腔积液 16(0.21) 1.74(1.07) 70 肾痛 6(0.08) 4.45(2.00)
27 嗜睡 16(0.21) 2.12(1.30) 71 垂体肿瘤良性 6(0.08) 26.22(11.75)
28 健忘症 16(0.21) 1.75(1.07) 72 肌痛 6(0.08) 17.10(7.67)
29 肺水肿 14(0.19) 2.34(1.38) 73 高钙血症 6(0.08) 3.60(1.62)
30 子宫平滑肌瘤 14(0.19) 10.27(6.08) 74 血睾酮升高 6(0.08) 21.12(9.47)
31 情绪波动 14(0.19) 3.92(2.32) 75 身高下降 6(0.08) 3.28(1.47)
32 血睾酮下降 14(0.19) 10.82(6.40) 76 静脉血栓栓塞 5(0.07) 14.24(5.91)
33 血液碱性磷酸酶增加 14(0.19) 3.90(2.31) 77 颈动脉狭窄 5(0.07) 8.76(3.64)
34 乳房触痛 13(0.17) 4.82(2.8) 78 冠状动脉狭窄 5(0.07) 7.59(3.16)
35 膀胱炎 13(0.17) 2.69(1.56) 79 尿失禁 5(0.07) 3.37(1.40)
36 帕金森病 13(0.17) 4.02(2.33) 80 脊柱狭窄 5(0.07) 3.31(1.38)
37 注意力集中障碍 13(0.17) 1.84(1.07) 81 高胆固醇血症 5(0.07) 3.30(1.37)
38 肝炎 13(0.17) 2.03(1.18) 82 过敏性休克 5(0.07) 4.78(1.99)
39 急性心肌梗死 13(0.17) 2.94(1.71) 83 急性肝功能衰竭 5(0.07) 2.82(1.17)
40 血管损伤 12(0.16) 41.87(23.7) 84 口干 5(0.07) 2.41(1)
41 排尿困难 12(0.16) 2.29(1.3) 85 眼睛不适 5(0.07) 6.05(2.51)
42 脑血管缺血 12(0.16) 2.37(1.34) 86 性腺功能减退 5(0.07) 23.41(9.72)
43 脑梗死 11(0.15) 2.98(1.65) 87 生殖器瘙痒 4(0.05) 19.43(7.27)
44 皮疹 11(0.15) 3.30(1.83) 88 子宫附件疼痛 4(0.05) 18.80(7.04)
排序 ADR 频次(%) ROR值
[95%CI(ROR)]
排序 ADR 频次(%) ROR值
[95%CI(ROR)]
89 阴道分泌物 4(0.05) 2.75(1.03) 95 腰围增加 4(0.05) 25.01(9.36)
90 拔毛癖 4(0.05) 38.14(14.25) 96 胃扩张 4(0.05) 16.07(6.02)
91 抑郁 4(0.05) 9.70(3.64) 97 视野缺损 4(0.05) 3.71(1.39)
92 推理能力障碍 4(0.05) 81.02(30.13) 98 黄斑变性 4(0.05) 2.74(1.03)
93 关节积液 4(0.05) 3.50(1.31) 99 垂体增大 4(0.05) 128.33(47.47)
94 雌二醇升高 4(0.05) 102.82(38.14) 100 糖尿病 4(0.05) 4.79(1.80)

①均表示未在说明书中出现的PT。

①means PT not included in the spectification.

表3 戈舍瑞林ADR信号报告频次(按降序排列)

Tab.3 Report frequency of ADR signals of goserelin (in descending order)

2.2 ADR信号强度检测结果

将筛选出亮丙瑞林和戈舍瑞林的ADR信号按ROR值95%CI(ROR)降序排序,其中,亮丙瑞林ADR信号中信号强度极强的前10位依次是消瘦、细菌性结膜炎、非传染性膀胱炎、肺门淋巴结肿大、腰围增加、注射部位肉芽肿、血睾酮升高、纵隔淋巴结肿大、变应性肺泡炎及卵巢过度刺激综合征(表4);戈舍瑞林ADR信号中信号强度极强的前十位依次是垂体出血、垂体增大、雌二醇升高、推理能力障碍、变异型心绞痛、血管损伤、拔毛癖、垂体肿瘤良性、腰围增加及性腺功能减退(表5)。

表4 亮丙瑞林的ADR信号的强度(按ROR降序排列)
Tab.4 The intensity of ADR signals of leuprolide (in descending order of ROR)
排序 ADR 频次(%) ROR值
[95%CI(ROR)]
排序 ADR 频次(%) ROR值
[95%CI(ROR)]
1 消瘦 14(0.62) 352.67(207.23) 27 子宫不规则出血 7(0.31) 7.55(3.59)
2 细菌性结膜炎 5(0.22) 327.43(134.83) 28 血尿 11(0.48) 6.92(3.83)
3 非传染性膀胱炎 5(0.22) 104.46(43.30) 29 注射部位脓肿 5(0.22) 6.15(2.56)
4 肺门淋巴结肿大 4(0.18) 101.72(38.01) 30 心肌病 4(0.18) 6.02(2.26)
5 腰围增加 4(0.18) 83.05(31.06) 31 注射部位反应 19(0.83) 5.97(3.8)
6 注射部位肉芽肿 13(0.57) 77.03(44.60) 32 帕金森病 5(0.22) 5.72(2.38)
7 血睾酮升高 6(0.26) 70.18(31.44) 33 吸入性肺炎 5(0.22) 5.21(2.16)
8 纵隔淋巴结肿大 6(0.26) 69.18(30.99) 34 月经过多 6(0.26) 5.17(2.32)
9 变应性肺泡炎 4(0.18) 58.92(22.05) 35 骨折 47(2.07) 4.96(3.71)
10 卵巢过度刺激综合征 4(0.18) 57.41(21.49) 36 高脂血症 4(0.18) 4.95(1.86)
11 子宫息肉 4(0.18) 47.39(17.74) 37 骨质疏松症 11(0.48) 4.62(2.55)
12 睑腺炎 5(0.22) 46.68(19.38) 38 癫痫 5(0.22) 4.50(1.87)
13 尿路梗阻 6(0.26) 40.86(18.32) 39 多器官衰竭 5(0.22) 3.67(1.52)
14 机化性肺炎 6(0.26) 32.90(14.75) 40 谵妄 4(0.18) 3.25(1.22)
15 心瓣膜关闭不全 4(0.18) 27.18(10.18) 41 男子乳房发育 7(0.31) 3.07(1.46)
16 热潮红 68(2.99) 26.24(20.61) 42 血红蛋白下降 13(0.57) 3.02(1.75)
17 间质性肺疾病 34(1.49) 18.35(13.08) 43 肝功能异常 10(0.44) 2.88(1.55)
18 注射部位硬结 40(1.76) 15.52(11.35) 44 发热 36(1.58) 2.67(1.92)
19 毛发生长异常 4(0.18) 13.47(5.05) 45 心力衰竭 21(0.92) 2.58(1.68)
20 血液碱性磷酸酶增加 13(0.57) 12.07(6.99) 46 肺栓塞 12(0.53) 2.43(1.38)
21 脂肪肝 8(0.35) 10.3(5.14) 47 糖尿病 8(0.35) 2.41(1.21)
22 腕管综合征 6(0.26) 9.66(4.33) 48 流行性感冒样症状 9(0.4) 2.32(1.21)
23 躁狂 6(0.26) 9.16(4.11) 49 多汗症 11(0.48) 2.17(1.20)
24 脑梗死 10(0.44) 9.02(4.85) 50 注射部位红斑 11(0.48) 2.14(1.18)
25 情绪波动 11(0.48) 7.80(4.31) 51 体质量增加 17(0.75) 2.06(1.28)
26 尿潴留 10(0.44) 7.66(4.12) 52 肺炎 22(0.97) 1.73(1.14)

①均表示未在说明书中出现的PT。

①means PT not included in the spectification.

表4 亮丙瑞林的ADR信号的强度(按ROR降序排列)

Tab.4 The intensity of ADR signals of leuprolide (in descending order of ROR)

表5 戈舍瑞林的ADR信号的强度(按ROR降序排列)
Tab.5 The intensity of ADR signals of goserelin (in descending order of ROR)
排序 ADR 强度(%) ROR值
[95%CI(ROR)]
排序 ADR 强度(%) ROR值
[95%CI(ROR)]
1 垂体出血 11(0.15) 198.34(108.35) 45 骨质疏松症 21(0.28) 3.74(2.44)
2 垂体增大 4(0.05) 128.33(47.47) 46 闭经 9(0.12) 3.72(1.93)
3 雌二醇升高 4(0.05) 102.82(38.14) 47 视野缺损 4(0.05) 3.71(1.39)
4 推理能力障碍 4(0.05) 81.02(30.13) 48 高钙血症 6(0.08) 3.60(1.62)
5 变异型心绞痛 7(0.09) 47.57(22.58) 49 血细胞计数异常 8(0.11) 3.57(1.79)
6 血管损伤 12(0.16) 41.87(23.70) 50 幻听 7(0.09) 3.55(1.69)
7 拔毛癖 4(0.05) 38.14(14.25) 51 关节积液 4(0.05) 3.50(1.31)
8 垂体肿瘤良性 6(0.08) 26.22(11.75) 52 尿失禁 5(0.07) 3.37(1.40)
9 腰围增加 4(0.05) 25.01(9.36) 53 脊柱狭窄 5(0.07) 3.31(1.38)
10 性腺功能减退 5(0.07) 23.41(9.72) 54 皮疹 11(0.15) 3.30(1.83)
11 血睾酮升高 6(0.08) 21.12(9.47) 55 高胆固醇血症 5(0.07) 3.30(1.37)
12 生殖器瘙痒 4(0.05) 19.43(7.27) 56 身高下降 6(0.08) 3.28(1.47)
13 子宫附件疼痛 4(0.05) 18.80(7.04) 57 勃起功能障碍 10(0.13) 3.24(1.74)
14 失眠型睡眠障碍 7(0.09) 18.69(8.89) 58 认知障碍 19(0.25) 3.06(1.95)
15 热潮红 158(2.09) 18.26(15.59) 59 脑梗死 11(0.15) 2.98(1.65)
16 听觉过敏 8(0.11) 17.55(8.76) 60 骨痛 25(0.33) 2.96(2.00)
17 肌痛 6(0.08) 17.10(7.67) 61 光敏反应 6(0.08) 2.95(1.32)
18 乳房胀大 9(0.12) 16.86(8.76) 62 急性心肌梗死 13(0.17) 2.94(1.71)
19 胃扩张 4(0.05) 16.07(6.02) 63 直立性低血压 6(0.08) 2.94(1.32)
20 静脉血栓栓塞 5(0.07) 14.24(5.91) 64 急性肝功能衰竭 5(0.07) 2.82(1.17)
21 间质性肺疾病 80(1.06) 12.98(10.41) 65 阴道分泌物 4(0.05) 2.75(1.03)
22 恐慌症 7(0.09) 12.95(6.16) 66 黄斑变性 4(0.05) 2.74(1.03)
23 脊髓压迫症 7(0.09) 11.72(5.58) 67 膀胱炎 13(0.17) 2.69(1.56)
24 血睾酮下降 14(0.19) 10.82(6.40) 68 肌无力 48(0.64) 2.60(1.96)
25 子宫平滑肌瘤 14(0.19) 10.27(6.08) 69 γ-谷氨酰转移酶升高 8(0.11) 2.54(1.27)
26 月经紊乱 11(0.15) 10.26(5.68) 70 血尿 20(0.26) 2.48(1.60)
27 激素水平异常 7(0.09) 10.13(4.82) 71 发冷 9(0.12) 2.44(1.27)
28 抑郁 4(0.05) 9.70(3.64) 72 口干 5(0.07) 2.41(1.00)
29 注射部位血肿 77(1.02) 9.18(7.33) 73 脑血管缺血 12(0.16) 2.37(1.34)
30 颈动脉狭窄 5(0.07) 8.76(3.64) 74 慢性阻塞性肺疾病 19(0.25) 2.35(1.50)
31 冠状动脉狭窄 5(0.07) 7.59(3.16) 75 肺水肿 14(0.19) 2.34(1.38)
32 注射部位炎症 7(0.09) 6.88(3.28) 76 体液潴留 17(0.23) 2.33(1.45)
33 性欲降低 20(0.26) 6.75(4.35) 77 四肢麻木 9(0.12) 2.31(1.20)
34 眼睛不适 5(0.07) 6.05(2.51) 78 排尿困难 12(0.16) 2.29(1.30)
35 耳部不适 7(0.09) 5.42(2.58) 79 血压异常 6(0.08) 2.25(1.01)
36 注射部位出血 45(0.60) 5.01(3.74) 80 注射部位疼痛 7(0.09) 2.20(1.05)
37 乳房触痛 13(0.17) 4.82(2.80) 81 自杀意念 27(0.36) 2.17(1.49)
38 糖尿病 4(0.05) 4.79(1.80) 82 嗜睡 16(0.21) 2.12(1.30)
39 过敏性休克 5(0.07) 4.78(1.99) 83 肝功能异常 41(0.54) 2.12(1.56)
40 肾痛 6(0.08) 4.45(2.00) 84 日常活动障碍 10(0.13) 2.12(1.14)
41 心肌病 9(0.12) 4.08(2.12) 85 心力衰竭 22(0.29) 2.11(1.39)
42 帕金森病 13(0.17) 4.02(2.33) 86 多汗症 43(0.57) 2.07(1.54)
43 情绪波动 14(0.19) 3.92(2.32) 87 肝炎 13(0.17) 2.03(1.18)
44 血液碱性磷酸酶增加 14(0.19) 3.90(2.31) 88 尿频 11(0.15) 2.00(1.10)
排序 ADR 强度(%) ROR值
[95%CI(ROR)]
排序 ADR 强度(%) ROR值
[95%CI(ROR)]
89 腹胀 25(0.33) 1.94(1.31) 95 跌倒发作 71(0.94) 1.53(1.21)
90 心房颤动 24(0.32) 1.89(1.26) 96 感觉迟钝 32(0.42) 1.52(1.08)
91 注意力集中障碍 13(0.17) 1.84(1.07) 97 骨折 56(0.74) 1.46(1.12)
92 体质量增加 50(0.66) 1.82(1.38) 98 食欲减退 40(0.53) 1.37(1.00)
93 健忘症 16(0.21) 1.75(1.07) 99 关节痛 66(0.87) 1.36(1.07)
94 胸腔积液 16(0.21) 1.74(1.07) 100 乏力 63(0.83) 1.29(1.01)

①均表示未在说明书中出现的PT。

①means PT not included in the spectification.

表5 戈舍瑞林的ADR信号的强度(按ROR降序排列)

Tab.5 The intensity of ADR signals of goserelin (in descending order of ROR)

2.3 ADR信号累及系统器官

将筛选出的ADR信号按累及器官/系统进行分类统计,由表6可见,亮丙瑞林共累及17个器官/系统,主要集中于中枢及外周神经系统损害、代谢和营养障碍、用药部位损害、呼吸系统损害、女性生殖系统损害等。戈舍瑞林共累及21个器官/系统,主要集中于中枢及外周神经系统损害、代谢和营养障碍、女性生殖系统损害、内分泌紊乱、神经紊乱、肌肉骨骼系统损害等。其中,在戈舍瑞林共累及的神经紊乱、胃肠系统损害、心率及心律紊乱、听觉和前庭功能损害、男性生殖系统损害等5个器官/系统中,未检测到亮丙瑞林的ADR信号;在亮丙瑞林累及的白细胞和网状内皮系统中,未检测到戈舍瑞林的ADR信号。

表6 亮丙瑞林和戈舍瑞林的ADR信号累及系统器官比较
Tab.6 Comparison of systems/ organs involved in ADR signals between leuprolide and goserelin
系统器官分类 亮丙瑞林 戈舍瑞林
PT 信号数 报告数 % PT 信号数 报告数 %
全身性损害 热潮红、发热、多器官衰竭、流 4 118 19.19 热潮红、过敏性休克、发冷、跌倒 5 306 17.86
行性感冒样症状 发作、乏力
用药部位损害 注射部位肉芽肿、注射部位硬结、 5 88 14.31 注射部位血肿、注射部位出血、注 4 136 7.94
注射部位反应、注射部位脓肿、 射部位炎症、注射部位疼痛
注射部位红斑
呼吸系统损害 变应性肺泡炎、机化性肺炎、间质 5 71 11.54 间质性肺疾病、慢性阻塞性肺疾 4 129 7.53
性肺疾病、吸入性肺炎、肺炎 病、肺水肿、胸腔积液
代谢和营养障碍 消瘦、腰围增加、血液碱性磷酸 6 60 9.76 腰围增加、血液碱性磷酸酶增 8 106 6.19
酶增加、高脂血症、体质量增 、糖尿病、高钙血症、身高
加、糖尿病 下降、液体潴留、体质量增
加、胆固醇血症
肌肉骨骼系统损害 骨折、骨质疏松症 2 58 9.43 肌痛、骨质疏松症、骨痛、肌无 7 226 13.19
、关节积液、骨折、关节痛
中枢及外周神经系统损害 脑梗死、腕管综合征、情绪波动、 7 47 7.64 推理能力障碍、脊髓压迫症、帕金 13 165 9.63
躁狂、帕金森病、癫痫、谵妄 森病、情绪波动、认知障碍、
脑梗死、脊柱狭窄、脑血管缺
血、嗜睡、四肢麻木、日常活
动障碍、感觉迟钝、注意力集中
障碍
泌尿系统损害 非传染性膀胱炎、尿路梗阻、尿潴 4 32 5.20 肾痛、血尿、膀胱炎、尿失禁、排 6 67 3.91
留、血尿 尿困难、尿频
女性生殖系统损害 卵巢过度刺激综合征、子宫息 5 25 4.07 乳房胀大、生殖器瘙痒、子宫附件 8 68 3.97
、子宫不规则出血、月经过 疼痛、子宫平滑肌瘤、月经紊
乱、乳房触痛、闭经、阴道分泌
心血管系统一般损害 心力衰竭 1 21 3.41 血管损伤、颈动脉狭窄、冠状动 6 56 3.27
脉狭窄、心力衰竭、直立性低
血压、血压异常
肝胆系统损害 脂肪肝、肝功能异常 2 18 2.93 肝功能异常、γ-谷氨酰转移酶升 4 67 3.91
、肝炎、急性肝功能衰
皮肤及其附件损害 毛发生长异常、多汗症 2 15 2.44 皮疹、多汗症、光敏反应 3 60 3.50
红细胞异常 血红蛋白下降 1 13 2.11 血细胞计数异常 1 8 0.47
内分泌紊乱 血睾酮升高、男子乳房发育 2 13 2.11 垂体出血、垂体增大、雌二醇升 8 57 3.33
高、垂体肿瘤良性、性腺功能减退、血睾酮升高、血睾酮下降、激素水平异常
系统器官分类 亮丙瑞林 戈舍瑞林
PT 信号数 报告数 % PT 信号数 报告数 %
血小板,出血和凝血障碍 肺栓塞 1 12 1.95 静脉血栓栓塞 1 5 0.29
白细胞和网状内皮系统异常 肺门淋巴结肿大、纵隔淋巴结肿 2 10 1.63 - 0
视觉损害 细菌性结膜炎、睑腺炎 2 10 1.63 眼睛不适、视野缺损、黄斑变 3 13 0.76
心肌、心内膜、心包及瓣膜损害 心瓣膜关闭不全、心肌病 2 8 1.30 变异型心绞痛、心肌病、急性心 3 29 1.69
肌梗死
神经紊乱 - 0 拔毛癖、失眠型睡眠障碍、恐慌 8 92 5.37
症、性欲降低、抑郁、幻听、自杀
意念、健忘症
胃肠系统损害 - 0 胃扩张、腹胀、口干、食欲减退 4 74 4.32
心率及心律紊乱 - 0 心房颤动 1 24 1.40
听觉和前庭功能损害 - 0 听觉过敏、耳部不适 2 15 0.88
男性生殖系统损害 - 0 勃起功能障碍 1 10 0.58

①均表示未在说明书中出现的PT。

①means PT not included in the spectification.

表6 亮丙瑞林和戈舍瑞林的ADR信号累及系统器官比较

Tab.6 Comparison of systems/ organs involved in ADR signals between leuprolide and goserelin

3 讨论
3.1 ADR信号分析

本研究所得到的亮丙瑞林和戈舍瑞林ADR信号与已知的安全性信息基本一致,主要导致全身性、用药部位、呼吸系统、代谢和营养、肌肉骨骼系统、中枢及外周神经系统等方面的损害,包括热潮红、骨折、骨质疏松症、注射部位损害、间质性肺疾病、腰围增加、体质量增加、情绪波动等,此部分两者共同的ADR很可能与此类药物引起的低雌激素血症有关,并且这些ADR与药品说明书收录基本相同,说明本研究具有一定的可信度。针对引起的低雌激素相关症状,可考虑采用反向添加疗法,即通过添加小剂量雌激素作为一种预防措施,用于消除由摄入GnRH激动剂引起的低雌激素症状,而不会影响抗激素疗法的有效性[10,11,12,13,14]

但两药ADR也各有不同之处,例如,在神经紊乱、胃肠系统损害、心率及心律紊乱、听觉和前庭功能损害、男性生殖系统损害等5个器官/系统中仅挖掘到戈舍瑞林的ADR信号,而未发现亮丙瑞林相关的信号,提示若存在这些系统疾病的患者应谨慎使用戈舍瑞林,尤其是存在神经紊乱的患者;在白细胞和网状内皮系统中,仅挖掘到亮丙瑞林的ADR信号,提示若存在此系统疾病如肺门淋巴结肿大、纵隔淋巴结肿大的患者应谨慎使用亮丙瑞林,注意个体化给药。

本研究也发现药品说明书收录不全之处。例如,对比亮丙瑞林说明书与本研究中亮丙瑞林信号强度排前 50位ADR可以发现,本研究所检测到的亮丙瑞林可能引起视觉损害及心脏损害的ADR信号,如细菌性结膜炎、睑腺炎、心瓣膜关闭不全、心肌病等,其余还包括腰围增加、子宫息肉、脂肪肝、月经过多、多器官衰竭、谵妄等ADR信号,均是说明书未提及的,提示临床使用亮丙瑞林时应对既往有眼部疾病和心脏疾病病史的患者谨慎使用。对比戈舍瑞林说明书与本研究中戈舍瑞林信号强度排前 50位的 ADR可以发现,本研究所检测到戈舍瑞林可引起垂体增大、腰围增加、子宫附件疼痛、听觉过敏、耳部不适、颈动脉狭窄、冠状动脉狭窄、肾痛、心肌病、帕金森病、血液碱性磷酸酶增加、视野缺损的ADR信号,均未收录于其说明书中。

另外,本文在筛选时,有部分较强ADR信号,如死亡、肿瘤转移、疾病进展、子宫内膜异位症等,考虑到亮丙瑞林及戈舍瑞林可用于前列腺癌、乳腺癌、子宫内膜异位症等患者,可能是原发疾病的影响,故未纳入本研究的结果及讨论范围;但需引起重视的是,癌症患者使用亮丙瑞林及戈舍瑞林进行内分泌辅助治疗时,可能出现肿瘤转移、肿瘤进展等ADR。但由于恶性肿瘤具有局部浸润和向远处转移的特点,不能仅凭药品ADR信号判断肿瘤转移与肿瘤进展是否因使用亮丙瑞林及戈舍瑞林引起。

3.2 研究方法的优点与缺陷

传统说明书收录的ADR,是在一个理想情况下通过病例对照研究、队列研究等临床研究得到,由于存在受试者有严格的纳入条件、研究样本量少、治疗时间有限和难以发现罕见ADR等缺点,上市前临床试验难以获取各药品完整的安全性信息,而上市后ADR信号检测可以部分弥补上述缺点。本研究正是通过对大量ADR自发上报数据库进行信号挖掘,更能反映出药品上市后的安全性,对减少患者ADR的发生具有重要意义。但是需要注意的是,FARES数据库本身具有一定的局限性:在人种方面,FAERS源于欧美人群的数据为主,存在人种差异,故使用FAERS数据库的数据不一定能够真实反映中国用药人群的ADR发生情况;其次,FAERS是不良事件报告库,其事件的发生缺乏与药品的相关性评价;同时,FAERS数据库属于自发呈报系统,其中部分ADR报告可能带有随意性和偏倚,低报漏报、内容不完整性等也会对结果造成影响[15]

ROR和PRR法具有计算简单、能估计相对危险度、减少由于对照组选择所带来的偏倚、计算结果一致性好的特点[16]。但这两种方法灵敏度较高,ADR信号数目多,样本量大时容易出现假阳性信号[15]。另外,虽然比例失衡法计算所得到的ADR信号表示目标药物与目标ADR在统计学上有关联,但并不能代表目标药物与目标ADR在生物学上有必然的因果联系[17],其关联性还需进行临床研究以进一步观察评估加以证实。

本研究通过使用ROR和PRR法挖掘亮丙瑞林和戈舍瑞林潜在的ADR信号,并进行对比,发现亮丙瑞林和戈舍瑞林导致的ADR主要包括全身性损害、用药部位损害、呼吸系统损害、代谢和营养障碍及肌肉骨骼系统损害ADR,亮丙瑞林较为特异的ADR有肺门淋巴结肿大、纵隔淋巴结肿大;戈舍瑞林较为特异的ADR有拔毛癖、失眠型睡眠障碍、恐慌症、胃扩张及听觉过敏,提示临床在使用两药时应该注意有相应病史的患者,注意个体化给药。 通过挖掘FAERS数据库中有关亮丙瑞林和戈舍瑞林的ADR信号,以期为临床用药提供更加真实安全的证据。

参考文献

[1] 杨艳丽,王辉,沈树娜,.GnRH-a在妇科疾病治疗中的临床应用研究进展[J].中外医学研究,2017,15(2):156-158.
[本文引用:1]
[2] LIN M H,WU S Y,HWU Y M,et al.Dual trigger with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin significantly improves live birth rate for women with diminished ovarian reserve[J].Reprod Biol Endocrinol,2019,17(1):7.
BACKGROUND: Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) remains one of the greatest obstacles affecting the chance of a successful live birth after fertility treatment. The present study was set to investigate whether using a
DOI:10.1186/s12958-018-0451-x      PMID:30609935      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[3] YANG X H,ZHANG X F,LIN B,et al.Combined thera-peutic effects of HIFU,GnRH-a and LNG-IUS for the treatment of severe adenomyosis[J].Int J Hyperthermia,2019,36(1):485-491.
DOI:10.1080/02656736.2019.1594057      PMID:30922132      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[4] ZANG Y Q,DONG M T,ZHANG K,et al.Hormonal the-rapy in uterine sarcomas[J].Cancer Med,2019,8(4):1339-1349.
Uterine sarcomas (USs) are a group of rare but aggressive uterine malignancies, accounting for only 1% of the malignant tumors of female reproductive organs. Due to the high rate of recurrence and metastasis, the prognosis of USs is poor. Given the high mortality rate and limited clinical benefit of surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, hormonal therapy has shown good prospects in recent years. Hormonal agents include progestins, aromatase inhibitors (AIs), and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRH-a). According to the literature, hormonal therapy has been confirmed effective for recurrent, metastatic or unresectable low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) and hormone receptor positive (ER+/PR+) uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) with favorable tolerance and compliance. Besides, hormonal therapy can also be used in patients with early-staged disease who desire to preserve fertility. However, due to the rarity of USs, the rationale of hormonal therapy is generally extrapolated from data of hormone-sensitive breast cancer, and present studies of hormonal therapy in USs were almost limited to case reports and small-sized retrospective studies. Therefore, further systematic researches and standardized clinical trials are needed to establish the optimal hormonal therapy regimen of USs. Herein, we reviewed the existing studies related to the hormonal therapy in USs in order to provide reference for clinical management in specific settings.
DOI:10.1002/cam4.2044      PMID:30897294      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[5] 袁凤刚,陈娟娟.戈舍瑞林联合腹腔镜治疗卵巢型子宫内膜异位症的疗效与安全性[J].医学理论与实践,2019,32(7):1037-1038.
[本文引用:1]
[6] 王欣. 醋酸亮丙瑞林联合莉芙敏治疗子宫内膜异位症的临床效果和安全性分析[J].中国实用医药,2019,14(7):74-75.
[本文引用:1]
[7] VAN PUIJENBROEK E P,BATE A,LEUFKENS H G,et al.A comparison of measures of disproportionality for signal detection in spontaneous reporting systems for adverse drug reaction[J].Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf,2002,11(1):3-10.
PURPOSE: A continuous systematic review of all combinations of drugs and suspected adverse reactions (ADRs) reported to a spontaneous reporting system, is necessary to optimize signal detection. To focus attention of human reviewers, quantitative procedures can be used to sift data in different ways. In various centres, different measures are used to quantify the extent to which an ADR is reported disproportionally to a certain drug compared to the generality of the database. The objective of this study is to examine the level of concordance of the various estimates to the measure used by the WHO Collaborating Centre for International ADR monitoring, the information component (IC), when applied to the dataset of the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Foundation Lareb. METHODS: The Reporting Odds Ratio--1.96 standard errors (SE), proportional reporting ratio--1.96 SE, Yule's Q--1.96 SE, the Poisson probability and Chi-square test of all 17,330 combinations were compared with the IC minus 2 standard deviations. Additionally, the concordance of the various tests, in respect to the number of reports per combination, was examined. RESULTS: In general, sensitivity was high in respect to the reference measure when a combination of point- and precision estimate was used. The concordance increased dramatically when the number of reports per combination increased. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the different measures used are broadly comparable when four or more cases per combination have been collected.
DOI:10.1002/pds.668      PMID:11998548      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[8] OOBA N,KUBOTA K.Selected control events and reporting odds ratio in signal detection methodology[J].Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf,2010,19(11):1159-1165.
PURPOSE: To know whether the reporting odds ratio (ROR) using
DOI:10.1002/pds.2014      PMID:20669233      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[9] 李婵娟. 药品不良反应信号检测方法理论及应用研究[D].西安:第四军医大学,2008:19-94.
[本文引用:1]
[10] WU D B,HU M,HONG L,et al.Clinical efficacy of add-back therapy in treatment of endometriosis:a meta-analysis[J].Arch Gynecol Obstet,2014,290(3):513-523.
A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effectiveness of using gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a), both with and without hormonal add-back therapy, for the management of endometriosis.
Cochrane library, Ovid (Embase) and Pubmed databases were searched between the years 1998 and 2013 for published, prospective, randomised controlled trials (RCT) that assessed the effectiveness of "add-back" therapy for EMs treatment. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan V5.0. The main outcome measures were as follows: lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) immediately after treatment and after 6 months of follow-up; femoral neck BMD; serum estradiol levels; changes in the Kupperman index score; the pelvic pain score, including dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia; and pelvic tenderness.
A total of 13 RCT, including 945 participants, were identified. The evidence suggested that "add-back" therapy was more effective for symptom relief than GnRH-a alone. BMD was significantly different when comparing "add-back" therapy to GnRH-a alone, both immediately after treatment and at 6 months. The "add-back" therapy increased serum oestrogen and did not reduce the efficacy of GnRH-a for treating dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia. A variety of add-back regimens had a same effect for the treatment of endometriosis.
"Add-back" therapy, based on the GnRH-a dose, does not reduce the efficacy of using GNRH-a for the management of endometriosis. "Add-back" therapy reduced the occurrence of side effects that can occur with GnRH-a therapy alone, such as osteoporosis and menopausal syndrome. There were no statistically significant differences when comparing the effectiveness of a variety of "add-back" regimens to each other.
DOI:10.1007/s00404-014-3230-8      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[11] SEO J W,LEE D Y,KIM S E,et al.Comparison of long-term use of combined oral contraceptive after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist plus add-back therapy versus dienogest to prevent recurrence of ovarian endometrioma after surgery[J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2019,236:53-57.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare long-term use of combined oral contraceptive (COC) after gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist plus add-back therapy with dienogest (DNG) treatment as medical treatments after surgery for ovarian endometrioma. METHODS: This prospective cohort study analyzed 52 reproductive-aged women who underwent surgery for ovarian endometrioma and received postoperative medical treatment with either COC after GnRH agonist (n = 20) or DNG (n = 32) for 24 months. Changes in quality-of-life (QOL) and bone mineral density (BMD) were compared according to treatment. In addition, recurrence of pain and lesions were compared. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not differ in demographic profiles and factors associated with endometriosis or QOL. During 24 months of treatment, no differences in any component of QOL were found between the two groups. BMD at the lumbar spine significantly decreased after the first 6 months of treatment in both COC after GnRH agonist (-3.5%) and DNG (-2.3%) groups, but the groups did not differ statistically. After 6 months, further decrease in BMD was not observed until 24 months in both groups. In addition, no cases of pain or endometrioma recurrence were found. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that long-term use of COC after GnRH agonist plus add-back therapy is comparable to dienogest as a long-term postoperative medical treatment for endometriosis.
DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.02.032      PMID:30884336      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[12] AKHKUBEKOVA N K,KAYSINOVA A S,FEDOROV A A,et al.The role of the combined balneotherapeutic treatment as the “add-back therapy” against the background of the anti-hormonal effects of the agonists of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in the women suffering from endometriosis genitalis externa[J].Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult,2018,95(5):31-39.
BACKGROUND: The use of agonists of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) for the rehabilitation treatment of the patients presenting with endometriosis genitalis externa is known to significantly enhance the risk of development of hypoestrogenism. The so-called 'add-back-therapy' is carried out as a preventive measure to eliminate hypoestrogenism caused by the intake of GnRH agonists without detriment to the effectiveness of anti-hormonal therapy. AIM: The objective of the present study was to estimate the effectiveness of the new method ('add-back hormone replacement therapy') in comparison with anti-hormonal therapy with the use of GRH agonists at the stage of the early postoperative medical rehabilitation based on the drinking of mineral waters (MW) and radon therapy (RT) in the patients who had undergone the laparoscopic interventions for the treatment of endometrioid heterotopies of the ovaries (1-3 months post-operatively). MATERIAL AND METHODS: To evaluate the effectiveness of the spa and health resort-based rehabilitation measures, the long-term effects of GnRH agonists have been studied in 2 groups of the patients formed by the of simple randomization method. The main group (MG) was comprised of 45 women received medical rehabilitation under conditions of a spa and health resort setting with the application of medium-salt water from the Pyatigorsk spring and radon therapy in the combination with triptorelin. The group of comparison (CG) was composed of 44 women given the treatment with the use of triptorelin under the out-patient conditions. The assessment of the results of the study included: the estimation of the intensity of pelvic pain syndrome, indicators of the hormonal status and the quality of life (QL), ultrasonic examination of the pelvic organs, and the occurrence of adverse effects of triptorelin. The duration of the study was 3 years (2014-2016). RESULTS: The analysis of the long-term results of the rehabilitative treatment has demonstrated that the rehabilitation activities under the spa and health resort conditions within 1-3 months after the surgical intervention including the application of MW and RT in the combination with an agonist of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (triptorelin) greatly contributed to the stability of the results of the treatment: specifically, only 2.5% of the patients suffered the recurrence of cystic ovarian endometriosis whereas 24.5% (p<0.001) reported the restoration of the reproductive function. The patients comprising the control group experienced the recurrence of the pathologic process in 7.5% of the cases and the restoration of the reproductive function in 15.8% of the cases (p<0.001). Simultaneously, the quality of life in the patients in the main group improved 3.4 times on the average in comparison with the initial level (p<0.001). The 2.2-fold improvement of the quality of life was documented in the control patients (p<0.001). At the same time, the frequency of adverse reactions to the treatment with triptorelin in the control patients was higher than in the main group including pain in the epigastric area, headache, irritability, hyperhidrosis, and instability of arterial blood pressure (ABP) that significantly deteriorated the life quality in these women. CONCLUSION: The comparative analysis of the results of the follow-up observations has demonstrated that the application of drinking mineral water and radon therapy for the treatment of the women suffering from endometriosis genitalis externa can be recommended as 'add-back therapy' against the background of anti-hormonal effects of agonists of gonadotropin-releasing hormone.
DOI:10.17116/kurort20189505131      PMID:30412147      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[13] OSUGA Y,TORNG P L,JENG C J.Clinical studies investi-gating the use of leuprorelin in Asian women with endometriosis:a review[J].J Obstet Gynaecol,2019,39(3):291-296.
We aimed to examine how leuprorelin has been studied for the treatment of women with endometriosis in Asia. We conducted a literature search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov. This review includes randomised trials of women with endometriosis treated with leuprorelin in Asia. Phase I-IV clinical trials published between January 1 2000 and December 31 2016 and written in English were included. Four studies were identified, showing that leuprorelin significantly improves pain and quality of life. The oestrone and oestradiol levels are decreased by leuprorelin but can be increased using an 'add-back' therapy with conjugated equine oestrogen and methoxyprogesterone. Menopause is more common in women treated with leuprorelin. The bone mineral density is reduced in women treated with leuprorelin. There are limited studies investigating the use of leuprorelin for the treatment of endometriosis in Asian populations. However, the research that has been conducted supports the use of leuprorelin in an Asian population.
DOI:10.1080/01443615.2018.1460584      PMID:30653368      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[14] GEOFFRON S,COHEN J,SAUVAN M,et al.Endometriosis medical treatment:hormonal treatment for the management of pain and endometriotic lesions recurrence.CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines[J].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol,2018,46(3):231-247.
The available literature, from 2006 to 2017, on hormonal treatment has been analysed as a contribution to the HAS-CNGOF task force for the treatment of endometriosis. Available data are heterogeneous and the general level of evidence is moderate. Hormonal treatment is usually offered as the primary option to women suffering from endometriosis. It cannot be used in women willing to conceive. In women who have not been operated, the first line of hormonal treatment includes combined oral contraceptives (COC) and the levonorgestrel-releasing intra uterine system (52mg LNG-IUS). As a second line, desogestrel progestin only pills, etonogestrel implants, GnRH analogs (GnRHa) with add back therapy and dienogest can be offered. Add back therapy should include estrogens to prevent bone loss and improve quality of life, it can be introduced before the third month of treatment to prevent side effects. The literature does not support preoperative hormonal treatment for the sole purpose of reducing complications or recurrence, or facilitating surgical procedures. After surgical treatment, hormonal treatment is recommended to prevent pain recurrence and improve quality of life. COCs or LNG IUS are recommended as a first line. To prevent recurrence of endometriomas COC is advised and maintained as long as tolerance is good in the absence of pregnancy plans. In case of dysmenorrhea, postoperative COC should be used in a continuous scheme. GnRHa are not recommended in the sole purpose of reducing endometrioma recurrence risk.
DOI:10.1016/j.gofs.2018.02.011      PMID:29530557      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[15] 李苑雅,张艳,沈爱宗.基于自发呈报系统药品不良反应信号检测方法的研究进展[J].安徽医药,2015,19(7):1233-1236.
[本文引用:2]
[16] 江静,侯永芳,刘秀娟,.药品不良反应信号检测方法概述[J].中国药物警戒,2010,7(2):78-80.
[本文引用:1]
[17] 张晓兰,夏佳.浅谈药物警戒中的安全信号与信号管理[J].药物流行病学杂志,2012,21(2):90-94.
[本文引用:1]
资源
PDF下载数    
RichHTML 浏览数    
摘要点击数    

分享
导出

相关文章:
关键词(key words)
亮丙瑞林
戈舍瑞林
不良反应信号
比例失衡法
报告比值比法
比例报告比值法

Leuprolide
Goserelin
ADR signals
Measures of disproportion...
Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR...
Proportional Reporting Ra...

作者
陈乾
陈力
程艺

CHEN Qian
CHEN Li
CHENG Yi