中国科技论文统计源期刊 中文核心期刊  
美国《化学文摘》《国际药学文摘》
《乌利希期刊指南》
WHO《西太平洋地区医学索引》来源期刊  
日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)
第七届湖北十大名刊提名奖  
医药导报, 2020, 39(11): 1511-1515
doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1004-0781.2020.11.011
沙库巴曲缬沙坦联合辅酶Q10治疗慢性心力衰竭52例*
Therapeutic Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan Combined with Coenzyme Q10 in the Treatment of 52 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
吕超1,, 覃雅婷1, 卢力2, 张欣欣1, 阮伟彬1, 万晓宁1, 郭小梅1,

摘要:

目的 观察沙库巴曲缬沙坦联合辅酶Q10对慢性心力衰竭(慢性心衰)的临床疗效及安全性。方法 选取华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院心内科收治的慢性心衰患者103例,采用随机数字表随机将其分为两组,治疗组(52例)在常规治疗基础上加用沙库巴曲缬沙坦和辅酶Q10,对照组(51例)在常规治疗基础上加用沙库巴曲缬沙坦,观察用药前及用药12周后两组患者临床症状、血清N-末端脑钠肽(NT-proBNP)、心功能分级、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、血钾、血肌酐(Scr)、左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)变化以及治疗对平均住院时间、30 d再住院率的影响。结果 治疗12周后,治疗组临床症状、心功能分级较对照组改善更明显,治疗组总有效率(86.54%)显著高于对照组(64.71%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗组NT-proBNP(1382.92±1160.75) pg·mL-1、LVEDD(57.32±9.72) mm、ALT(18.58±14.29) U·L-1、Scr(72.13±31.58) μmol·L-1较对照组NT-proBNP(1978.19±1532.83) pg·mL-1、LVEDD(61.32±9.11) mm、ALT(22.37±14.40) U·L-1、Scr(86.29±26.53) μmol·L-1显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗组eGFR(87.50±19.75) mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1、LVEF(38.63±12.84)%与对照组eGFR(73.27±19.77) mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1、LVEF(34.02±8.93)%比较显著提高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 沙库巴曲缬沙坦联合辅酶Q10治疗慢性心衰的效果显著,可降低心衰患者NT-proBNP水平,改善心功能,且对肝肾功能影响较小,具有良好的安全性。

关键词: 沙库巴曲缬沙坦 ; 辅酶Q10 ; 心力衰竭

Abstract:

Objective To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of salkubatrol/valsartan in combination with coenzyme Q10 in patients with chronic heart failure. Methods A total of 103 patients diagnosed with chronic heart failure in the Department of Cardiology,Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology were included and randomly divided into two groups according to a random number table.Patients in treatment group were given salkubatrol/valsartan and coenzyme Q10 on the basis of conventional treatment,while patients in control group were given salkubatrol/valsartan only on the basis of conventional treatment.We analyzed and assessed several items in all patients before and after treatment for 12 weeks,including clinical symptoms,serum N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP),cardiac function classification,alanine aminotransferase (ALT),glomerular filtration rate (eGFR),serum potassium,serum creatinine (Scr),left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD),left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF),average hospitalization time and 30 day readmission rate. Results After 12-week treatment,patients in treatment group showed notable improvement in the aspects of clinical symptoms and cardiac function classification when compared with control group.The total effective rate in treatment group (86.54%) was also higher than that in control group (64.71%),which showed a significant statistical difference.In comparison with control group,patients in treatment group had lower levels of NT-proBNP [(1382.92±1160.75) pg·mL-1 vs(1978.19±1532.83) pg·mL-1],LVEDD [(57.32±9.72) mm vs(61.32±9.11) mm],ALT [(18.58±14.29) U·L-1 vs(22.37±14.40) U·L-1],and blood creatinine [(72.13±31.58) μmol·L-1 vs(86.29±26.53) μmol·L-1] after treatment,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); However,patients in treatment group had higher levels of eGFR [(87.50±19.75) mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1 vs(73.27±19.77) mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1] and LVEF [(38.63±12.84)% vs(34.02±8.93) %] than that in control group after treatment,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical efficacy of salkubatrol/valsartan combined with coenzyme Q10 in patients with chronic heart failure is remarkable.In the chronic heart failure context,the combination treatment of salkubatrol/valsartan with coenzyme Q10 can significantly reduce NT-proBNP content with notable improvement on cardiac function and little adverse effect on renel function,indicating the good safety of the combination treatment.

Key words: Salkubatrol/Valsartan ; Coenzyme Q10 ; Heart failure

开放科学(资源服务)标识码(OSID)

慢性心力衰竭(慢性心衰)是一种复杂的临床综合征,是各种心血管疾病的终末期表现,主要表现为呼吸困难、乏力、水肿等,给患者的生活质量带来了严重的影响;也是世界上难以攻克的难题,是导致患者住院与再住院的原因之一,被认为是世界上的一种流行病;其预后差,病死率高,在传统的金三角药物(血管紧张素转换酶抑制药/血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗药、β受体阻断药、醛固酮受体拮抗药)治疗后,5年死亡率仍然超过50%[1,2,3,4]。沙库巴曲缬沙坦(LCZ696)是一种脑啡肽酶抑制药,具有阻断血管紧张素Ⅱ受体、抑制脑啡肽酶双靶点调节作用,可显著降低心血管死亡率和心衰住院率[5]。心衰是一种能量消耗性疾病,可能与线粒体功能障碍、三磷酸腺苷(adenosine triphosphate ,ATP)生成不足有关[6]。辅酶Q10(coenzyme Q10,CoQ10)是一种抗氧化剂,可促进ATP的生成,改善心衰的能量消耗状态[7]。因此,沙库巴曲缬沙坦联合辅酶Q10治疗心力衰竭可能产生叠加效应,笔者目前尚未见相关研究证实二者联合治疗心衰的作用。笔者通过分析103例心衰患者的血清N-末端脑钠肽 (N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide,NT-proBNP)、左心室舒张末期内径(left ventricular end diastolic diameter,LVEDD)、左心室射血分数(left ventricular ejection fraction,LVEF)等水平的变化,旨在探讨沙库巴曲缬沙坦联合辅酶Q10治疗慢性心衰的临床疗效。

1 资料与方法
1.1 临床资料

入选标准:①符合2018年中国心衰诊断和治疗指南制定的慢性心衰诊断标准;②年龄≥18岁;③心功能分级(NYHA)Ⅱ-Ⅳ级;④LVEF<50%;⑤脑尿钠肽(BNP)≥150 pg·mL-1(或NT-proBNP水平≥600 pg·mL-1)。排除标准:①收缩压<90 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),或有症状性低血压;②肾小球滤过率(eGFR) <30 mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1;③血清钾水平>5.2 mmol·L-1;④有血管性水肿及肿瘤病史。选取2019年1—12月于华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院心内科住院治疗的慢性心衰患者103例,采用随机数字表法分为治疗组52例,对照组51例。

治疗组男38例,女14例,平均年龄(57.35±14.03)岁,心功能Ⅱ级14例,Ⅲ级25例,Ⅳ级13例,原发病因包括扩张型心肌病27例,冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病17例,其他心脏病8例。

对照组男38例,女13例,平均年龄(60.16±14.94)岁,心功能Ⅱ级21例,Ⅲ级21例,Ⅳ级9例,原发病因包括扩张型心肌病26例,冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病21例,其他心脏病4例。

两组患者性别、年龄、心功能、心衰病因、高血压、心房颤动、糖尿病等资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

1.2 治疗方法

对照组在常规治疗(利尿药、β受体阻断药、醛固酮受体拮抗药、洋地黄类药物等)基础上加用沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠片(商品名:诺欣妥,生产企业:Novartis Pharma Schweiz AG,批准文号:国药准字H20170343,规格:每片100 mg),根据患者血压、病情,起始剂量每次25 mg,bid,逐渐增加至每次200 mg,bid。治疗组在对照组基础上加用辅酶Q10[生产企业:卫材(中国)药业有限公司,批准文号:国药准字H10930021,规格:每片10 mg]10 mg,tid。两组疗程均为12周。

1.3 观察指标

对比两组患者用药前及用药12周后临床症状、NT-proBNP、心功能分级、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、eGFR、血钾、血肌酐(Scr)、LVEDD、LVEF变化,以及对平均住院时间、30 d再住院率的影响。

1.4 疗效判定标准

根据患者用药前后临床症状、心功能(New York Heart Association,NYHA)分级进行评估。显效:治疗12周后症状显著改善,NYHA心功能分级达到I级或提升2级;有效:治疗12周后症状改善,NYHA心功能分级提升1级;无效:治疗12周后症状无改善,NYHA心功能分级无明显变化;恶化:治疗12周后症状较治疗前加重,NYHA心功能分级降低≥1级。总有效率(%)=[(显效例数+有效例数)/总例数]×100%。

1.5 统计学方法

选择IBM SPSS 25.0版统计软件对研究数据进行分析,计量资料用均数±标准差( x ¯ ±s)表示,组间差异性比较采用独立样本t检验。组内差异性比较采用配对样本t检验。计数资料以率(%)表示,选择χ2检验。以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

2 结果
2.1 两组患者基线资料

两组患者年龄、性别、心功能分级、病史、原发病因等基线资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),见表1。

表1 两组患者基线资料比较
Tab.1 Comparison of baseline data between two groups of patients 例,$\bar{x}±s$
组别 例数 性别 年龄/岁 病史 原发病因
高血压 糖尿病 房颤 扩心病 冠心病 其他
对照组 51 38 13 60.16±14.94 23 13 12 26 21 4
治疗组 52 38 14 57.35±14.03 23 7 13 27 17 8
组别 NYHA心功能分级 NT-proBNP/
(pg·mL-1)
LVEDD/
mm
LVEF/
%
对照组 21 21 9 4477.27±3351.30 63.77±7.89 28.78±9.08
治疗组 14 25 13 4685.96±3735.11 64.71±11.92 29.23±11.08
组别 ALT/
(U·L-1)
Scr/
(μmol·L-1)
血钾/
(mmol·L-1)
eGFR/
[mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1]
对照组 28.71±23.14 100.75±32.53 4.17±0.37 69.11±20.20
治疗组 30.53±25.68 116.08±86.68 4.16±0.37 67.25±20.39

表1 两组患者基线资料比较

Tab.1 Comparison of baseline data between two groups of patients 例,$\bar{x}±s$

2.2 治疗12周后两组患者临床症状及NYHA心功能分级改善情况比较

治疗组总有效率(86.54%)显著高于对照组(64.71%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.677,P=0.010),见表2。

表2 两组患者治疗12周后临床症状和NYHA心功能分级改善情况
Tab.2 Improvement of clinical symptoms and NYHA cardiac function classification after 12 weeks of treatment in two groups of patients
组别 例数 显效 有效 恶化 无效 总有效
% % % % %
对照组 51 12 23.53 21 41.18 6 11.76 12 23.53 33 64.71
治疗组 52 23 44.23 22 42.31 2 3.85 5 9.61 45 86.54

表2 两组患者治疗12周后临床症状和NYHA心功能分级改善情况

Tab.2 Improvement of clinical symptoms and NYHA cardiac function classification after 12 weeks of treatment in two groups of patients

2.3 两组治疗12周后NT-proBNP、LVEDD、LVEF比较

治疗组NT-proBNP水平降低程度显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者治疗后LVEDD减小,且治疗组优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组治疗后LVEF显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),结果见表3。

表3 两组患者治疗12周后NT-proBNP、LVEDD、LVEF比较
Tab.3 Comparison of NTproBNP,LVEDD and LVEF between the two groups of patients after 12 weeks of treatment $\bar{x}±s$
组别 例数 NT-proBNP/
(pg·mL-1)
LVEDD/
mm
LVEF/
%
对照组 51 1978.19±1532.83 61.32±9.11 34.02±8.93
治疗组 52 1382.92±1160.75 57.32±9.72 38.63±12.84
t -2.206 -4.850 2.246
P 0.032 0.000 0.029

表3 两组患者治疗12周后NT-proBNP、LVEDD、LVEF比较

Tab.3 Comparison of NTproBNP,LVEDD and LVEF between the two groups of patients after 12 weeks of treatment $\bar{x}±s$

2.4 两组患者肝肾功能比较

治疗12周后,治疗组ALT、血钾、Scr等低于对照组,eGFR高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),结果见表4。

表4 两组患者肝肾功能相关指标比较
Tab.4 Comparison of liver and kidney function indexes between the two groups of patients $\bar{x}±s$
组别 例数 ALT/
(U·L-1)
Scr/
(μmol·L-1)
对照组 51 22.37±14.40 86.29±26.53
治疗组 52 18.58±14.29 72.13±31.58
t -2.705 -2.253
P 0.007 0.029
组别 血钾/
(mmol·L-1)
eGFR/
[mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1]
对照组 4.03±0.36 73.27±19.77
治疗组 3.94±0.42 87.50±19.75
t 2.101 2.234
P 0.036 0.030

表4 两组患者肝肾功能相关指标比较

Tab.4 Comparison of liver and kidney function indexes between the two groups of patients $\bar{x}±s$

2.5 两组患者平均住院时间及30 d再住院率比较

治疗后治疗组和对照组患者平均住院时间和30 d再住院率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),见表5。

表5 两组患者平均住院时间及30 d再住院率比较
Tab.5 Comparison of average hospital stay and 30-day readmission rate between the two groups of patients $\bar{x}±s$
组别 例数 平均住院
时间/d
30 d再入院/例 再住院率/
%
对照组 51 11.29±6.60 13 38 25.49
治疗组 52 11.41±6.20 9 43 17.31

表5 两组患者平均住院时间及30 d再住院率比较

Tab.5 Comparison of average hospital stay and 30-day readmission rate between the two groups of patients $\bar{x}±s$

3 讨论

心衰的发生与神经-内分泌系统过度激活、心室重构密切相关。心衰是全球主要的健康问题之一,既降低了患者的生活质量,给患者及其家庭带来了巨大的经济负担,也带来了沉重的社会负担。目前,尽管慢性心衰死亡率在ACEI/ARB、β受体阻断药、醛固酮受体拮抗药等药物治疗后得到很大改善,但仍然具有很高的发病率和死亡率,其5年死亡率甚至与多数癌症相当[4]

沙库巴曲缬沙坦可同时抑制RAAS系统并调节利钠肽系统。多项大型研究表明,不管是射血分数减少型心衰(heart failure reduced with ejection fraction,HFrEF)还是射血分数保留型心衰(heart failure preserved with ejection fraction,HFpEF)患者,沙库巴曲缬沙坦均能使其在降低心血管死亡、心衰住院风险以及再住院率,改善心衰患者症状、生活质量、日常活动限制等方面获益[8,9,10,11]。同时,国内外多个指南也推荐沙库巴曲缬沙坦为心衰治疗的基石药物,2018中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南将沙库巴曲缬沙坦推荐为Ⅰ类,B级证据[1];2017美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国心衰学会心力衰竭管理指南将沙库巴曲缬沙坦推荐为Ⅰ类,B-R级证据[12];2016年欧洲心脏病学会心衰指南将沙库巴曲缬沙坦推荐为I类,B级证据[13]。辅酶Q10作为一种心衰辅助用药,目前在临床得到广泛应用。有研究表明,辅酶Q10的缺乏与心力衰竭严重程度相关[14],长期应用辅酶Q10可改善心衰患者的临床症状、心功能分级,减少不良心血管事件的发生且安全可靠[7]

本研究结果发现,治疗12周后,治疗组患者的临床症状及心功能改善情况较对照组明显,即应用辅酶Q10可显著改善患者的临床症状以及心功能分级,这与之前的研究结果相符。单用沙库巴曲缬沙坦或联合应用沙库巴曲缬沙坦、辅酶Q10均能降低心衰患者的LVEDD以及NT-proBNP水平,同时提升LVEF,但研究结果证明两者联合用药效果更佳。沙库巴曲缬沙坦可显著降低心衰患者出院后30 d再入院率[15],但本研究治疗组和对照组患者出院后30 d再入院率无显著差异,且单独用药和联合用药对患者平均住院时间的影响也无统计学上的差异,这表明联合用药可能对心衰患者30 d再住院率以及平均住院时间无明显影响。在安全性方面,研究结果显示,与单独使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦相比,将沙库巴曲缬沙坦和辅酶Q10联合应用的患者,其血ALT、血钾、血Scr水平明显降低,eGFR较之升高,这提示联合应用沙库巴曲缬沙坦和辅酶Q10治疗慢性心衰患者较为安全。沙库巴曲缬沙坦已广泛用于心衰治疗,联合应用辅酶Q10治疗心衰,疗效更加确切。本研究辅酶Q10用量为10 mg,tid,应用更大剂量的辅酶Q10是否能更加改善心衰患者的临床疗效,有待进一步研究。

综上所述,沙库巴曲缬沙坦联合辅酶Q10在改善慢性心衰的临床症状及心功能方面效果显著,且优于单独使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦;同时,联合用药对肝肾功能影响较小,临床用药安全性尚可。本研究也存在一定的不足,样本量较少,随访时间短,可能会对结果产生一定的影响,有待开展更大样本、更长时间随访的临床研究 。

参考文献

[1] 中华医学会心血管病学分会心力衰竭学组,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南2018[J].中华心血管病杂志,2018,46(10):760-789.
[本文引用:2]
[2] LUSCHER T F.Heart failure:the cardiovascular epidemic of the 21st century[J].Eur Heart J,2015,36(7):395-397.
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv004      PMID:25681826      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[3] ZIAEIAN B,FONAROW G C.Epidemiology and aetiology of heart failure[J].Nat Rev Cardiol,2016,13(6):368-378.
PMID:26935038      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[4] BUI A L,HORWICH T B,FONAROW G C.Epidemiology and risk profile of heart failure[J].Nat Rev Cardiol,2011,8(1):30-41.
Heart failure (HF) is a major public health issue, with a prevalence of over 5.8 million in the USA, and over 23 million worldwide, and rising. The lifetime risk of developing HF is one in five. Although promising evidence shows that the age-adjusted incidence of HF may have plateaued, HF still carries substantial morbidity and mortality, with 5-year mortality that rival those of many cancers. HF represents a considerable burden to the health-care system, responsible for costs of more than $39 billion annually in the USA alone, and high rates of hospitalizations, readmissions, and outpatient visits. HF is not a single entity, but a clinical syndrome that may have different characteristics depending on age, sex, race or ethnicity, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) status, and HF etiology. Furthermore, pathophysiological differences are observed among patients diagnosed with HF and reduced LVEF compared with HF and preserved LVEF, which are beginning to be better appreciated in epidemiological studies. A number of risk factors, such as ischemic heart disease, hypertension, smoking, obesity, and diabetes, among others, have been identified that both predict the incidence of HF as well as its severity. In this Review, we discuss key features of the epidemiology and risk profile of HF.
DOI:10.1038/nrcardio.2010.165      PMID:21060326      URL    
[本文引用:2]
[5] SOLOMON S D,CLAGGETT B,DESAI A S,et al.Influence of ejection fraction on outcomes and efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction:the prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to determine impact on global mortality and morbidity in heart failure (PARADIGM-HF) trial[J].Circ Heart Fail,2016,9(3):e2744.
[本文引用:1]
[6] SHARMA A,FONAROW G C,BUTLER J,et al.Coenzyme Q10 and heart failure: a state-of-the-art review[J].Circ Heart Fail,2016,9(4):e2639.
[本文引用:1]
[7] MORTENSEN S A,ROSENFELDT F,KUMAR A,et al.The effect of coenzyme Q10 on morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure:results from Q-SYMBIO:a randomized double-blind trial[J].JACC Heart Fail,2014,2(6):641-649.
OBJECTIVES: This randomized controlled multicenter trial evaluated coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) as adjunctive treatment in chronic heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: CoQ10 is an essential cofactor for energy production and is also a powerful antioxidant. A low level of myocardial CoQ10 is related to the severity of HF. Previous randomized controlled trials of CoQ10 in HF were underpowered to address major clinical endpoints. METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe HF were randomly assigned in a 2-year prospective trial to either CoQ10 100 mg 3 times daily or placebo, in addition to standard therapy. The primary short-term endpoints at 16 weeks were changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, 6-min walk test, and levels of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide. The primary long-term endpoint at 2 years was composite major adverse cardiovascular events as determined by a time to first event analysis. RESULTS: A total of 420 patients were enrolled. There were no significant changes in short-term endpoints. The primary long-term endpoint was reached by 15% of the patients in the CoQ10 group versus 26% in the placebo group (hazard ratio: 0.50; 95% confidence interval: 0.32 to 0.80; p = 0.003) by intention-to-treat analysis. The following secondary endpoints were significantly lower in the CoQ10 group compared with the placebo group: cardiovascular mortality (9% vs. 16%, p = 0.026), all-cause mortality (10% vs. 18%, p = 0.018), and incidence of hospital stays for HF (p = 0.033). In addition, a significant improvement of NYHA class was found in the CoQ10 group after 2 years (p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term CoQ10 treatment of patients with chronic HF is safe, improves symptoms, and reduces major adverse cardiovascular events. (Coenzyme Q10 as adjunctive treatment of chronic heart failure: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre trial with focus on SYMptoms, BIomarker status [Brain-Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)], and long-term Outcome [hospitalisations/mortality]; ISRCTN94506234).
DOI:10.1016/j.jchf.2014.06.008      PMID:25282031      URL    
[本文引用:2]
[8] WWCHTER R,SENNI M,BELOHLAVEK J,et al.Initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in haemodynamically stabilised heart failure patients in hospital or early after discharge: primary results of the randomised TRANSITION study[J].Eur J Heart Fail,2019,21(8):998-1007.
PMID:31134724      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[9] SOLOMON S D,RIZKALA A R,GONG J,et al.Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: rationale and design of the PARAGON-HF trial[J].JACC Heart Fail,2017,5(7):471-482.
PMID:28662936      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[10] THOMAS M,KHARITON Y,FONAROW G C,et al.Association of changes in heart failure treatment with patients' health status: real-world evidence from CHAMP-HF[J].JACC Heart Fail,2019,7(7):615-625.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to use a multicenter, observational outpatient registry of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) to describe the association between changes in patients' medications with changes in health status. BACKGROUND: Alleviating symptoms and improving function and quality of life for patients with HFrEF are primary treatment goals and potential indicators of quality. Whether titrating medications in routine clinical care improves patients' health status is unknown. METHODS: The association of any change in HFrEF medications with 3-month change in health status, as measured using the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Scale, was determined in unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted (25 clinical characteristics, baseline health status) models using hierarchical linear regression. RESULTS: Among 3,313 outpatients with HFrEF from 140 centers, 21.9% had medication changes. Three months later, 23.7% and 46.4% had clinically meaningfully worse (>/=5-point decrease) and improved (>/=5-point increase) Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Scale scores. The 3-month median change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Scale score for patients whose HFrEF medications were changed was significantly larger (7.3 points; interquartile range: -3.1 to 20.8 points) than in patients whose medications were not changed (3.1 points; interquartile range: -4.7 to 12.5 points) (adjusted difference 3.0 points; 95% confidence interval: 1.4 to 4.6 points; p < 0.001). Among patients whose medications were adjusted, 26% had very large clinical improvement (>/=20 points) compared with 14% whose regimens were not changed. CONCLUSIONS: In routine care of patients with HFrEF, changes in HFrEF medications were associated with significant improvements in patients' health status, suggesting that health status-based performance measures can quantify the benefits of titrating medicines in patients with HFrEF.
DOI:10.1016/j.jchf.2019.03.020      PMID:31176672      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[11] 魏安华,李娟.《中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南2018》药物更新透视[J].医药导报,2019,38(5):539-543.
[本文引用:1]
[12] YANCY C W,JESSUP M,BOZKURT B,et al.2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart failure society of America[J].Circulation,2017,136(6):e137-e161.
PMID:28455343      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[13] PONIKOWSKI P,VOORS A A,ANKER S D,et al.2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC[J].Eur Heart J,2016,37(27):2129-2200.
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128      PMID:27206819      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[14] JANKOWSKI J,KORZENIOWSKA K,CIESLEWICZ A,et al.Coenzyme Q10 -A new player in the treatment of heart failure?[J].Pharmacol Rep,2016,68(5):1015-1019.
Coenzyme Q10 is the only endogenously synthesized lipid with a redox function which exhibits broad tissue and intracellular distribution in mammals. Beneficial effects of Coenzyme Q10 supplementation were observed in several age-related diseases including heart failure. CoQ10 (coenzyme Q10) level is significantly decreased in patients with this disease, which correlates with severity of clinical symptoms. Supplementation with various pharmaceutical formulations of CoQ10 improves impaired cardiac function and clinical course of heart failure. Current data from clinical trials indicate that CoQ10 can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality of heart failure patients in addition to guideline recommended pharmacotherapy.
DOI:10.1016/j.pharep.2016.05.012      PMID:27428763      URL    
[本文引用:1]
[15] DESAI A S,CLAGGETT B L,PACKER M,et al.Influence of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) on 30-day readmission after heart failure hospitalization[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2016,68(3):241-248.
BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure (HF) are at high risk for hospital readmission in the first 30 days following HF hospitalization. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine if treatment with sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) reduces rates of hospital readmission at 30-days following HF hospitalization compared with enalapril. METHODS: We assessed the risk of 30-day readmission for any cause following investigator-reported hospitalizations for HF in the PARADIGM-HF trial, which randomized 8,399 participants with HF and reduced ejection fraction to treatment with LCZ696 or enalapril. RESULTS: Accounting for multiple hospitalizations per patient, there were 2,383 investigator-reported HF hospitalizations, of which 1,076 (45.2%) occurred in subjects assigned to LCZ696 and 1,307 (54.8%) occurred in subjects assigned to enalapril. Rates of readmission for any cause at 30 days were 17.8% in LCZ696-assigned subjects and 21.0% in enalapril-assigned subjects (odds ratio: 0.74; 95% confidence interval: 0.56 to 0.97; p = 0.031). Rates of readmission for HF at 30-days were also lower in subjects assigned to LCZ696 (9.7% vs. 13.4%; odds ratio: 0.62; 95% confidence interval: 0.45 to 0.87; p = 0.006). The reduction in both all-cause and HF readmissions with LCZ696 was maintained when the time window from discharge was extended to 60 days and in sensitivity analyses restricted to adjudicated HF hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with enalapril, treatment with LCZ696 reduces 30-day readmissions for any cause following discharge from HF hospitalization.
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.047      PMID:27417000      URL    
[本文引用:1]
资源
PDF下载数    
RichHTML 浏览数    
摘要点击数    

分享
导出

相关文章:
关键词(key words)
沙库巴曲缬沙坦
辅酶Q10
心力衰竭

Salkubatrol/Valsartan
Coenzyme Q10
Heart failure

作者
吕超
覃雅婷
卢力
张欣欣
阮伟彬
万晓宁
郭小梅

LYU Chao
QIN Yating
LU Li
ZHANG Xinxin
RUAN Weibin
WAN Xiaoning
GUO Xiaomei